Access key 0 - Accessibility, Access key 2 - Jump to content, Access key 7 - Jump to navigation
Skip To Content | Skip To Navigation
 

Home > About Ofcom > Corporate Structure and Governance > Ofcom Board > Policy on conflicts of interest


Policy on conflicts of interest

Non-Executive Ofcom Board Members’ Interests In Companies In The Communications Sector

  1. It is essential that Ofcom should establish and maintain a reputation for impartiality, integrity and high professional standards. Amongst other things, this means that there must never be any legitimate reasons for people outside Ofcom to suspect that our decisions may be influenced by the private interests of Non-Executive Board members; or that Non-Executive Board members may be able to profit from information available to them through their work. Working within these necessary standards of probity it is also important that Ofcom is able to attract Non-Executive Board members with knowledge of the sector it regulates; it is therefore important for Ofcom that it is able to manage sensibly and appropriately potential conflicts of interest the Non-Executive Board members may have or that may arise from time to time.
  2. Non-Executive Board members may, on occasion, find themselves in a situation where they may be subject to what would be deemed to be a conflict of interest. In such circumstances such conflicts should be referred to the Secretary to the Corporation who will advise the Non-Executive Board member on the appropriate course of action (which could, inter alia, involve ceasing an activity or role, disposing of an interest or being excused from part of a Board meeting).
  3. There are numerous individual companies in the Communications sector. Many are subsidiaries of other companies, often with diverse interests. In some cases, participation in the UK Communications sector is a major activity for these groups; in others, it is less significant. Accordingly, it is not appropriate to impose an absolute prohibition on Non-Executive Board members having an interest in all companies that are actively involved in some way in the wide Communications industry – that would be too prohibitive and would prevent Ofcom from benefiting from the experience of members. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to impose certain restrictions to ensure that Non-Executive Board members do not put themselves in a position where their interests could be perceived to be in conflict with their official duties or could damage Ofcom’s reputation.
  4. Detailed guidance is attached. However, it is important to note that:
  5. Non-Executive Board members should have no interests in companies a significant part of whose activities are those of an Ofcom-regulated company (excluding companies who require solely a Wireless Telegraphy Act Licence). Where the Ofcom-regulated activity forms only a small part of the overall group’s activity, an interest may be held, provided the Non-Executive Member gains approval and the interest is made transparent to external stakeholders.
  6. Non-Executive Board members may have significant interests in other non-regulated companies in the Communications sector PROVIDED they gain approval and there is full transparency about any such interests.
  7. Finally, it is important to note that all colleagues at Ofcom (including specifically executive Board members) and other part-time members of Ofcom (for example members of the Content Board) are also subject to policies on conflicts of interest and further iterations of this policy will be provided to them.

David Currie
Chairman of Ofcom

Interests In Communications Companies: Procedures

  1. Non-Executive Board members are advised to exercise caution when dealing in shares of Communications sector companies, and generally to be alert to possible conflicts of interest between their personal financial affairs and their official duties.
  2. The following rules must be observed in all circumstances:

There are other situations which merit special consideration. For instance, in the case of a former elected representative who had lost office, the main consideration in assessing acceptability would be whether such a person intended to seek re-election or adoption as a candidate at the next opportunity. Or in the case of a person holding office in a party political organisation, the main consideration in assessing acceptability would be whether this was regarded as a step towards selection as a candidate.

3. Non-Executive Board members should note the following additional points:

Such register will be updated regularly.


Back to top Back to top