- Advice for Consumers
- How to complain
- Ofcom licensing
- Find a document
- Research and Market Data
- Consultations
- Competition and Consumer Bulletin
- Media and Analysts
- Contacting Ofcom
- About Ofcom
Home > Competition and Consumer Bulletin > Competition and Consumer Bulletin > Open Cases > All Open Cases > CW/00990/06/08
Super-complaint on the cost of calls made by prisoners
Complainant: The National Consumer Council (“NCC”), The Scottish Consumer Council (“SCC”) and the Welsh Consumer Council (“WCC”), supported by the Prison Reform Trust (“the complainants”)
Complaint: The cost of telephone calls made by prisoners
Case opened: 24 June 2008
Issues: Whether the provision of telephone services in prisons has a feature or combination of features which significantly harm the interests of consumers.
Relevant instrument: Section 11 of The Enterprise Act 2002 (“the Act”)
Introduction
On 24 June 2008 Ofcom received a super-complaint from the complainants, about the cost of telephone calls made by prisoners in England, Wales and Scotland. The complainants allege that “the interests of consumers are significantly harmed by aspects of the market concerned”. In particular, the complaint alleges that this is due in part to the terms and conditions of the existing service operated by British Telecommunications plc under contract to the HM Prison Service Trust in publicly-run prisons in England and Wales and the existing service for prisons in Scotland operated by Siemens Enterprise Communications Ltd under contract with the Scottish Prison Service.
The main allegations in the super-complaint are:
- “The high cost of calls from prisons and the extent to which these appear unrelated to the cost of provision;
- The continuing high level of charges, at a time when most other basic telephone services and other ICT-related products and services have fallen significantly in price;
- The terms and conditions of the existing service explicitly seek to prevent competition; and
- The extent to which these issues are caused and exacerbated by the unsatisfactory and secretive nature of the contracts and, the apparent arbitrariness of decisions, since they came into effect, that disadvantage the consumers.”
The complaint also notes wider public policy implications.
The full complaint can be found here: http://www.ncc.org.uk/nccpdf/poldocs/NCC207_prisoner_phonecalls_supercomplaint.pdf
Background
A super-complaint, as defined in section 11(1) of the Act is a complaint submitted by a designated consumer body that ‘any feature or combination of features, of a market in the UK for goods or services is or appears to be significantly harming the interests of consumers’(-1-).
Ofcom’s consideration of the super-complaint
Ofcom will review the complaint to satisfy itself that the NCC has presented a reasoned case for further investigation and met the criteria set out in the Act.
Once this has been satisfied we will then carry out wider enquiries with a view to testing the claims made by the complainants and will liaise with the various stakeholders in order to form a reasoned view on whether the super-complaint justifies further action.
Ofcom will publish its decision on what action, if any, it proposes to take in response to the super-complaint by 22 September 2008.
Case Leaders: Lisle Alden (020 7783 4406 e-mail: Lisle.Alden@ofcom.org.uk) and Ian Vaughan (020 7783 4331 e-mail Ian.Vaughan@ofcom.org.uk)
Case Reference: CW/00990/06/08
Footnotes:
1.- For further information on super-complaints see: http://www.oft.gov.uk/advice_and_resources/resource_base/super-complaints/
Back to top