Access key 0 - Accessibility, Access key 2 - Jump to content, Access key 7 - Jump to navigation
Skip To Content | Skip To Navigation
 

Home > Consultations > Consultation Documents > Ofcom penalty guidelines > Section 2


2. Ofcom's draft penalty guidelines

Consultation published: 26|04|2006
Consultation closes: 26|04|2006

The proposed text of the penalty guidelines is set out in paragraphs 1 to 11 below.

“Statutory background

1. Section 392 of the Communications Act 2003 ('the Act') requires Ofcom to prepare and publish a statement containing the guidelines they propose to follow in determining the amount of penalties imposed by them under the Act or any other enactment apart from the Competition Act 1998.

2. Ofcom’s various powers to impose financial penalties are summarised in the second column of Annex B. The statutory maximum penalty for each type of contravention is shown in the third column of the Annex.

3. In accordance with section 392(4) of the Act, Ofcom is consulting with the Secretary of State and appropriate persons about this statement. In addition, under section 392(5) of the Act, Ofcom will consult the Secretary of State as to the manner of publication.

4. By virtue of section 392(6) of the Act, Ofcom must have regard to the statement for the time being in force when setting the amount of any penalty under this Act or any other enactment (apart from the Competition Act 1998).

General criteria

5. The amount of any penalty must be appropriate and proportionate to the contravention in respect of which it is imposed. In addition Ofcom must have regard to any representations made to them by the person in breach. Accordingly, Ofcom, in setting the level of penalty, will consider all relevant circumstances.

6. In general, Ofcom is likely first to consider the following factors in determining the starting figure of any penalty:

Specific criteria which may be relevant depending on the contravention

7. Certain specific criteria may be relevant to adjust the starting figure of any penalty depending on the type of contravention. This may include, but would not necessarily be limited to:

Additionally, in the case of content-related breaches by broadcasters:

Factors tending to lead to an increase in the level of any penalty

8. This may include, but would not necessarily be limited to:

Factors tending to decrease the level of any penalty

9. This may include, but would not necessarily be limited to:

Final amount of penalty

10. Having taken regard of any representations the person may wish to make and having considered the factors listed above (to the extent that they are relevant) and any other circumstances relevant to the particular case under consideration, Ofcom will determine an appropriate and proportionate penalty. In doing so it will ensure that the amount does not exceed the maximum penalty for the particular type of contravention.

Revision of the statement of policy

11. Section 392(2) of the Act provides that Ofcom may from time to time revise their statement as they think fit. Any such alterations must be the subject of consultation with the Secretary of State and other such persons, as Ofcom considers appropriate. This statement will be reviewed in the light of experience in applying it over time. In particular, the guidelines will be reviewed prior to the implementation of fixed penalties in relation to offences under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 as provided for in section 180 (Schedule 6) to the Act.”



Back to top Back to top

Related Items