- Introductions
Alastair Robertson
SACOT
Alex Campbell (Chair) Oftel
Andy Holliday telegate
Ltd
Caroline Wallace Oftel
David Carver CMA
Ian Watson (notes) BT
Liz Vallarelli Vodafone
Martin Rayment BAA
Moore Kennedy NIACT
Paul Whiteing ICTIS
Peter Sayers CFB
Richard Allen Telewest
Tom Hickey Conduit
Gareth Morgan BT Apologies
Gwyneth Williams WACT Apologies
- Review
of previous minutes
The
previous minutes were agreed and Dirk Amtsberg thanked in his
absence for their accuracy and the speed with which they were
produced.
- Agree
note-taker
Ian
Watson - BT
- Industry
Group Updates
- Billing
and Interconnect update – AH, Telegate
It
was reported that the group was now much more focussed on deploying
enhanced billing facilities rather than basic interconnection
as the latter was now implemented. In recognition of this the
group is now chaired jointly by Dirk Amtsberg of telegate and
Sue Coxon of Accurate Billing.
In
response to questions, Ian Watson and Andy Holliday explained
that the billing and settlement process for implementation on
December 10th worked but was restricted in its capabilities.
At first, all calls to 118 services will appear on BT bills
in the ‘Other Calls’ section. They will eventually move to a
new ‘Directory Services’ section. All 118 calls on BT bills
will show time and date of call, number dialled, call duration
and call charge. No information on onward connection will be
provided.
Ian
Watson reported on how complaints and refunds would work. Each
DQ service provider would provide a contact number or address
through which customers could seek redress. The exact policies
would vary from provider to provider with reputable ones seeking
to offer quality services at acceptable prices.
- Implementation
(Umbrella) group update – CW, Oftel
It
was reported that the group had received a very useful presentation
from BT’s Age and Disability team on TextPhones, TextDirect
and the need for DQ service providers to consider their responsibilities
under the Disability Discrimination Act. ICSTIS are now a very
welcome and useful part of the group and continue to provide
advice and guidance on consumer issues related to 118 services
and their promotion. The group has considered the issue of ‘code
portability’ to allow service providers to change host networks
should they so wish. Other topics discussed at the group’s meetings
are covered elsewhere in these minutes.
- Network
Announcements – TH, Conduit
Tom
Hickey reported on progress in developing an acceptable network
messaging solution for the end of parallel running. Individual
companies signing a memorandum of understanding setting out their
aims have formed the group. Oftel have said that if the MoU group
can demonstrate a practical, commercially viable method to deliver
information on the new 118 services to consumers calling 192/153
after the end of parallel running, then they will consider reallocating
the 192 code to a specific network operator to enable this to
happen. The MoU group have agreed a Request for Proposal and this
has been sent to as many potential suppliers as possible and responses
are awaited.
In
response to questions, Tom said that the intention was to deliver
information about appropriate 118 services to consumers on an
even-handed basis.
- DQ and
Payphones – CW, Oftel
It
was reported that Oftel had met several times with BT Payphones
to discuss 118 and associated issues. BT’s public payphones can
only charge on a pence-per-minute basis and cannot accept fixed
fee charges. Charges are usually higher from a payphone than from
a landline. At present, for 192 and 153 services, BT Payphones
charge 20p per 110 seconds, a price subsidised for social telephony
reasons. The proposal is that call charges for 192/153 from BT
payphones should stay at this level until the codes are withdrawn.
No objections to this approach have been received.
In
response to questions, CW said that other payphone providers and
hotels were free to promote codes and charge for them as they
saw fit. She also advised that it was not yet clear how individual
service providers would handle refunds for calls made from payphones.
NAP
6.1 AC (Oftel) to take the issue of refunds for payphone customers
to DQ IWG.
- ICSTIS
– PW, ICSTIS
Paul
Whiteing reported on progress to date. All the necessary documentation
to allow the applications for prior permission to launch service
on December 10th is now available from ICSTIS and their
website. So far (4/11/02) only 6 applications have been received
with the closing date of November 15th approaching.
Following the initial batches of applications, there will be a
further review of 118 by ICSTIS in early 2003 and this may lead
to further public consultation. Proposals for a separate code
of practice as suggested by Vodafone could be considered at that
point.
In
response to a suggestion that the paragraphs in ICSTIS’s Guidelines
covering refunds could be placed together and strengthened, PW
pointed out that the guidelines had to reflect and reinforce the
underlying Code of Practice. Following another question, PW and
CW said that it was not ICSTIS’s role to monitor whether callers
were incurring artificially high charges through operators delivering
their services slowly – this is an area for consumers to exercise
choice in.
- Consumer
Guide – AC, Oftel