| Oftel's management plan 2002/3 - 18 April 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contents
Chapter 1 Strategy update Chapter 2 Strategy development Chapter 3 Projects and programmes 2002/3 List of projects and programmes Chapter 4 Oftel's budget 2002/3 Chapter 5 Responses to consultation process and questions Alphabetical list of projects and programmes Annex 1 Summary of Oftel regulatory decisions – 2001/2 Annex 2 Non-market reviews timetable Annex 3 Market research plans for 2002/3 Foreword from the Director General of Telecommunications This management plan for 2002/3 updates Oftel’s strategy to meet its objectives and sets out Oftel's projects, programmes and budget for 2002/3. The plan is set against a background of change in demand for more sophisticated services such as broadband though basic telephony remains of fundamental importance. There have been major changes over the last year as a result of competition and because of the financial environment. Major change in 2002 will come from the new European framework, and related new UK legislation. The plan includes:
The plan has been consulted on widely. Oftel has benefited from the views expressed by domestic and business consumers and the telecoms industry and others with an interest in telecoms. Oftel looks forward to working with a wide range of organisations and individuals as it tackles the important issues over the year ahead. David Edmonds Director General of Telecommunications
Strategy update Introduction 1.1 Oftel's aim to obtain the best deal for consumers in quality, choice and value for money is achieved primarily through promoting effectively competitive electronic communications markets. Oftel intervenes to protect consumers where competition is insufficiently established or where there are special features of networks that require intervention. 1.2 Oftel’s objectives are:
1.3 Since January 2000, Oftel has adopted a 'competition plus' approach to achieve these objectives. 1.4 The 2002/3 plan takes account of experience, and looks ahead to the European framework and OFCOM. The context for 2002/3 management plan, is set out in this chapter by considering
Strategy achievements 1.5 Some telecoms markets are becoming increasingly competitive though effective competition has yet to be achieved in others. The pace of change of technology and consumers’ demands means constant need for investment in new networks and services. Regulatory action needs to be focused on its objectives and should not undermine incentives for investment and innovation. Oftel should pursue the minimum regulation necessary to achieve the best deal for the consumer. Additional and existing regulation should be reviewed and justified. 1.6 Oftel does this by:
1.7 Regular market reviews to ensure appropriate regulation is reflected in the EU Framework Directive, which will come into force in 2002. 1.8 In terms of performance measurement Oftel has:
Table 1: Service delivery agreement targets
Oftel’s managed response to promote competition 1.9 As noted above Oftel has, as one of its four high level operational objectives, the achievement of 'effective competition – benefiting consumers'. It seeks to do this by promoting competition at all levels in both networks and services. This translates into actions which are both pro-active and re-active:
1.10 In most of the 1990s, the focus was on developing infrastructure competition in both the fixed and mobile sectors. This strategy was to a considerable extent successful in establishing alternative networks over the UK with:
In investment terms, some £8 billion was invested in UK telecoms networks of all types in both 2001 and 2000 and builds on substantial investment in the 1990s by cable, BT, mobile and other operators of around £50 billion. 1.11 In the last few years, development of infrastructure competition has slowed down as the cable companies finish their build rates and the mobile industry achieves full national coverage. At the same time there has been greater demand from service providers for access to BT's network, particularly in relation to unmetered internet access and to broadband services. Oftel's response has been to use its discretion, both in granting access to the network and also in setting the terms and conditions on which access is to be made available. 1.12 In seeking a balance between the various objectives of protecting consumers, promoting competition and encouraging investment and innovation in the provision of telecoms services, account has been taken of whether services in question are new and the degree of risk facing the operators in providing them. Typically the extent of regulation for 'new' services provided by BT is less intrusive in order to avoid undermining its incentives to invest in such services. A key related factor is the extent of risk facing development and launch of new services: where risk is high action should be commensurate to reward the level of risk. So, for example, access to BT's ATM network has been proposed despite it being a new service but has been done so the basis of ‘retail minus’ prices in order to avoid undermining BT's incentives to invest in new network facilities. In contrast it has been proposed to mandate private partial circuits as an interconnect product with prices set on the basis of 'cost plus' reflecting the limited risk facing BT of providing such products in a mature market. 1.13 The greater emphasis on developing access to networks, both by other network providers and particularly by service providers in recent years, does not reflect a policy change away from infrastructure competition. Oftel's goal is to have competition at all levels in provision of wholesale and retail services. The regulator cannot predict, nor can it create, investment in infrastructure amongst aspiring entrants. Oftel sets the rules consistent with its overall strategy and in response to the needs of new entrants and overall impact on the market. 1.14 Initiatives to enable local loop unbundling and carrier pre-selection could be seen as moves away from infrastructure competition. This is not the case. These initiatives are more a recognition that getting rid of entry barriers to promote infrastructure competition will enable investment to take place but eventually this build will tail off. Once the infrastructure is built, there will be other opportunities in the market (such as LLU and CPS) which Oftel has responded to in a way that does not undermine any incentives to further investment. The recent difficulties experienced by telcos in raising funds to invest are more a feature of turbulent capital markets than a result of regulatory uncertainty. 1.15 Where new opportunities for infrastructure competition arise in future, (eg introduction of spectrum trading on a widespread basis) then Oftel (or its successor) will need to be both pro-active in seeking opportunities to promote further competition in infrastructure and respond positively to requests to promote such competition. 1.16 Where there is sufficient, self-sustaining competition then Oftel can withdraw from promoting competition. This is unlikely to come about until there is sufficient infrastructure competition that will itself, develop and sustain services competition over competing networks. Individual decisions to promote competition 1.17 In summary actions to promote competition can be grouped into three main categories all concerned with the basis on which competitors can get access to networks of players with market power. High intervention
Medium intervention
Non intervention
1.18 The basis chosen will be dependent on the assessment of the current and prospective states of competition in the relevant market including the degree of certainty and level of risk in the market. New markets where there are high levels of risk are not usually suitable for high levels of intervention to enable market entry to promote competition. Conversely where there are mature markets with relatively low levels of risk, it will be more appropriate to take a more interventionist approach to enabling market entry to promote competition. 1.19 The consistency of these different bases with Oftel’s overall strategy can be assessed by considering the outcome of the action. Where the outcome has been on a sustainable basis to improve the deal for consumers in terms of prices paid, choice available, improvements in quality of service and value for money, then the initiative can be seen to be appropriate. In those cases where an initiative has not initially succeeded consideration needs to be given to whether there are on going prospects for competition and how best to achieve this. Oftel’s future approach to promoting competition 1.20 Each case is considered in relation to Oftel’s overall strategy and options appraised for fit with the strategy. The action taken will depend on:
1.21 The drivers for making these assessments and coming to decisions are from two sources:
1.22 These two processes which will overlap and interact provide both an element of predictability (in terms of EU reviews) and reactiveness to demands from the market players. To this extent, the outcome of these activities cannot be forecast precisely. Oftel's aim therefore is to foster the conditions for competition to develop effectively in all markets through:
Lessons learnt 1.23 Taking account of the strategy achievements and the managed response to promoting competition set out above, the lessons learned by Oftel can be summarised as follows:
External developments impacting on strategy 1.24 There have been some major changes in the external environment:
1.25 Oftel’s strategy has been robust in the face of those changes; but Oftel now needs to update it. Strategy issues in relation to the new EU framework, broadband and OFCOM are considered in Chapter 2. Improving the applicability of strategy principles 1.26 Oftel has identified regulatory principles to provide clarity and predictability. These have been updated following the suggested amendments set out in the draft plan in December and consultation responses received (see Table 2 below). Table 2: Oftel strategy principles – updated April 2002
Improving strategy implementation processes 1.27 Three key processes are being updated for 2002/3. These are set out below. 1.28 First, in assessing policy options, Oftel will have an approach that meets Government's Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) and consumer groups' Customer Impact Assessment (CIA) requirements while recognising that Oftel is an independent sectoral regulator with EU Directive requirements, and specific statutory duties. Oftel will issue Option Appraisal guidelines in spring 2002 to cover these aspects. 1.29 Second, market analyses guidelines (incorporating existing effective competition review) will be issued to:
1.30 Third, Oftel will develop a non-market reviews (NMRs) methodology to better identify consumer interest criteria, which can trigger regulatory involvement, and the principles, which should shape proportionate intervention. These will primarily be used to review existing regulatory action in areas such as data protection, ombudsman scheme, numbering (see annex 2 for indicative forward review timetable). Strategy development Introduction 2.1 Oftel's needs to ensure its direction is clear when addressing new challenges. Key among these will be:
Aligning Oftel's strategy with new EU Directives 2.2 The strategy needs to align with the framework in the five new EU Directives on regulation of electronic communications (Framework, Access and Interconnection, Authorisation, Universal Service and Communications Data Protection Directives). 2.3 The Directives are due to take effect in April 2002 and there is 15 months in which to transpose the directives into national law. Oftel will work with other regulators and the Commission to ensure consistency. There will be changes needed in Oftel’s internal processes. Market analyses will be obligatory before regulatory rules promoting competition are imposed under the new Directives, and Oftel’s programme of analyses begins in 2002/3. 2.4 There are two related projects in relation to the EU Directives: to oversee the implementation programme of work; and to co-ordinate the market analyses. 2.5 The Framework Directive sets three objectives for regulatory authorities:
2.6 For 2002/3, these objectives will be Oftel’s guiding objectives, with the existing objectives being used at the operational level. Table 3: Alignment of Oftel objectives with overall EU objectives
2.7 Oftel currently supports the internal market by, for example, tackling barriers to entry. Oftel will work most closely with NRAs and the Commission and through bodies such as the European Regulatory Group (ERG) to ensure consistent application. Impact of the new EU Directives 2.8 Agreement has now been reached between the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament on a new package of Directives that will establish a framework for the regulation of the electronic communications network and services throughout Europe. The Directives will enter into force when they are published in the Official Journal of the European Community. Member States will have 15 months in which to transpose the provisions into national legislation and to bring regulation into line with the new Directives. 2.9 The purpose of the new Directives is to establish a harmonised framework for regulation across Europe and establish a set of procedures to ensure the harmonised application of the regulatory framework throughout the Community. 2.10 There are five directives: Framework Directive (FD) 2.11 As the name implies, this Directive sets the overall framework, including objectives and principles which Oftel must take into account when making regulatory decisions. In addition, the framework directive sets out the principle that, in most cases, market reviews must be carried out before regulation is imposed and that regulation is only to be imposed where the market is not effectively competitive. Significant Market Power has been newly defined so that it is equivalent to the competition law concept of dominance. 2.12 Other provisions in the FD include the obligations on NRAs to consult with the Commission and other NRAs before taking decisions and procedures to ensure the harmonisation of regulation across Europe. Authorisation Directive (AD) 2.13 This Directive requires the abolition of the existing licensing regime. The providers of electronic communications networks and services will no longer be required to obtain explicit approval before they can offer services. Where NRAs require it, operators may be required to submit a notification of their intention to offer networks and services. 2.14 The AD sets out a maximum list of obligations that can apply to all providers of networks and services. These 'general conditions' will replace existing licence conditions. Access and Interconnection Directive (AID) 2.15 This Directive deals with wholesale relationships between providers of networks and services and associated facilities. The AID places general obligations on operators to negotiate interconnection. 2.16 This Directive also sets out the responsibilities of NRAs and the limits of their discretion in imposing obligations related to access or interconnection. For the most part, such obligations can be imposed only on those found to have SMP in the relevant wholesale market. Universal Service Directive (USD) 2.18 The USD sets out a procedure for designating providers of universal service and a minimum set of services that these operators must provide. 2.19 In addition to dealing with universal service, the USD details specific obligations that may be imposed on particular providers that are found to have SMP in retail markets, much as the AID does for wholesale markets. Also included in the USD are provisions covering consumers’ contracts with telecoms providers, number portability and procedures for providing consumers with an out of court dispute resolution process. Data Protection Directive (DPD) 2.20 This directive aims to ensure protection of users’ right to privacy in the processing of telecommunications data. The DPD is lagging behind the other directives in the negotiation process and the final text will be agreed later than the other four Directives. Impact on Oftel’s workplan 2.21 During the transitional period (from entry into force until transposition of the directives into national law) Oftel must:
2.22 On the day after the Directives enter into national law:
The market reviews 2.23 As noted above, the new framework will oblige Oftel to review markets, prepare SMP designations and review all regulatory measures currently in place in all telecommunications markets ready for when the Directives enter into national law. 2.24 Oftel envisages at this stage that the process by which market reviews are carried out will be similar to that for Oftel’s current programme of effective competition reviews. The process will be updated by:
2.25 The markets to be reviewed and the order in which they are reviewed will be defined by a number of factors including:
2.26 The current indications from the commission are that regulatory authorities will not see any indication of Commission defined markets until the directives come into force. However, Oftel envisages reviews being carried out in at least the following broad sectors which will cover voice and data, and both retail and wholesale markets, where appropriate:
2.27 In addition, the Directives require the obligations that the Directives will automatically impose on providers of conditional access in the broadcasting market to be reviewed. It is also envisaged that some form of broadband market review, including local loop unbundling and wholesale DSL provision will be needed. Oftel is currently undertaking a review of all obligations under the current directives so that it can ensure that they are reviewed in the appropriate market review. 2.29 It is useful to indicate the current position in terms of market reviews being conducted by Oftel as these reviews will have an influence on the timing and scope of EU market reviews to be conducted by Oftel. Mobile
Fixed PSTN
Leased lines
Dial-up Internet access
Conditional access
2.30 Oftel intends to inform and informally consult with stakeholders on the EU market review process in Q1 when the EU publishes its draft list of recommended markets for consultation. Scope for formal consultation will be limited by the constraints imposed by the EU timetable and the scope and timing of any mandatory requirements made by the Commission on Oftel. Broadband regulatory strategy 2.31 Oftel’s strategy needs to be able to provide a coherent basis for new areas of work. A key issue remains appropriate regulation of broadband networks and services to meet emerging consumer demands, as reflected in Oftel's projects and programmes for 2002/3 as described in chapter 3. A fuller description of Oftel’s regulatory strategy for broadband was published in December 2001. www.oftel.gov.uk/publications/broadband/other/stratb1201.htm 2.32 Oftel’s aim is to enable consumers’ demands for broadband to be met. Large businesses, SMEs and residential consumers all have different needs. Different supply routes and technologies – fixed, mobile and satellite – are likely to be needed. Regulation sets the framework. The outcomes will be determined by the actions of commercial firms meeting the demands of their customers. 2.33 Oftel’s focus is to meet demands through effective competition at all levels in the provision of broadband services: in infrastructure (ie in access, the middle mile and backbone networks) and in services provided over networks. 2.34 It is vital in developing markets which require large investment that effective competition is promoted through appropriate regulation ie the minimum regulation required to deliver outputs. Oftel must balance incentives to invest and innovate with prevention of excessive pricing. 2.35 For broadband, Oftel will use the generic competition analysis rules to assess the case for appropriate regulatory action:
2.36 Oftel has:
2.37 The future course of consumer demand for broadband is unclear. Technologies to deliver broadband services are still developing. The future development of the broadband market(s) is uncertain. In such circumstances the regulator needs to be especially sensitive to the impact of intervention on market developments and investment. Oftel’s strategy provides a framework to ensure that the impact of regulatory decisions is taken fully into account. This applies equally to Oftel’s work to prevent anti-competitive behaviour. This will ensure a coherent and predictable approach to regulatory action. 2.38 Oftel will also continue to work with Government departments, to help increase consumer awareness of broadband services. Oftel will work with the Small Business Task Force to provide information; publish bi-monthly briefings on availability and takeup of broadband. 2.39 The regulatory framework should be coherent and predictable. Oftel will continue to monitor availability of broadband services. Oftel will contribute to the work of the Broadband Stakeholders Group and the delivery of Government conclusions on its recommendations. 2.40 Oftel will support this work with an extensive programme of data gathering and market analysis and international benchmarking. Looking ahead to OFCOM: key policy issues 2.41 In 2002/3 Oftel will contribute to developing thinking for OFCOM. The combined regulator will enable ‘joined-up’ decision making. For example in spectrum trading, where Oftel welcomes moves to remove barriers to the further development of competition, or in the issue of access to networks for service providers, in particular the interaction between competitive converging markets and requirements for specific types of content to be available to all. 2.42 Oftel will develop ever closer joint working with its fellow regulators to help develop a consistent, consumer-focused basis for regulation under OFCOM. Projects and programmes for 2002/3 Introduction 3.1 The projects and programmes for 2002/3 are described in this chapter. Projects contain a number of one-off tasks which are time specific while programmes usually encompass either a series of related projects or comprise ongoing work such as case handling. Table 4 lists the projects and programmes followed by a detailed list showing activities for each project/programme by quarter (beginning April-June 2002). 3.2 Any organisation or consumer who wants to discuss a project or programmes should contact the named project or programme manager directly. This applies to
Project/programme changes since December draft management plan 3.3 There are several projects looking at broadband issues. Three relevant projects were identified in the consultation document
These are now combined into a single programme of work, 'strategy and development of broadband networks' (A6). 3.4 Separately there are also two areas of work which consider narrowband Internet access:
3.5 In addition to the consolidation of the above broadband projects, during the consultation period there have been a number of changes to Oftel’s proposed work programme. The references below are project/programme numbering as per the consultation document unless otherwise stated. The main changes are listed below:
How Oftel's planned activities relate to its organisational structure 3.5 To put the management plan projects and programmes in context it is useful to explain how they relate to Oftel's organisational structure and how the structure in turn relates to Oftel's strategy. 3.6 Oftel has three Directorates:
3.7 Regulatory Policy activity is primarily project based and concerned with developing and implementing policy in relation to Oftel's objectives of achieving effective competition including enabling consumers to be well informed, protecting consumers in the absence of competition and setting the overall framework for regulation. 3.8 This type of work is readily summarised, in most cases, in terms of projects that describe a series of milestones for the completion of tasks and production of outputs. 3.9 In contrast, the majority of activity in the Compliance Directorate is responsive to external demands for Oftel to act in specific cases. It therefore has a greater proportion of its activity in the form of programmes of ongoing streams of work dealing with individual cases generated by complaints about specific telcos and service providers from suppliers and customers. Nevertheless, this work is equally relevant to that of Regulatory Policy in the development and implementation of Oftel's strategy especially in terms of preventing anti-competitive practice, but also in protecting consumers and achieving competition. 3.10 Compliance activities implement and enforce aspects of the Telecoms Act 1984 and the Competition Act 1998 and European Directives. This legislation provides the overarching framework for most of these activities and can therefore on occasion constrain both what the Directorate does and its way of working. However in recent years many of the key developments led by Oftel eg on FRIACO and broadband – have emerged directly from consideration of complaints rather than from ‘pure’ policy work. 3.11 Within the legislative bounds, Oftel’s compliance activities must
3.12 The management plan represents a snapshot of planned work for the coming year and so it cannot easily illustrate how these processes of investigations, policy development and enforcement take place within compliance programmes. To do this, where possible, compliance programmes in the plan this year include illustrations of specific action being taken or due to be taken as well as descriptions of processes to be carried out. In addition for 2002/3, Oftel will improve the transparency of processes and outcomes of compliance work and their relation to strategy through:
Stages of work 3.13 The planned work against objectives and type of activity reflects Oftel’s focus in each subject area in 2002/3. Projects and programmes will contain elements that relate to other objectives and activities. 3.14 Projects are likely to have the sequence of review – implementation – monitoring. The timescale will depend on the scale and complexity of the issue. 3.15 Oftel is committed to monitoring and evaluating its policies to see whether they are achieving the policy objective initially set. This will be on the basis of both pro-active monitoring and response to specific complaints. 3.16 The review cycle for market segments fits with this approach, and the timetable for specific reviews is being revised as part of the work in implementing the new EU framework. 3.17 Where a review, concludes no specific regulatory intervention is necessary, then the cycle of review – implementation – monitoring will end. Stakeholder involvement 3.18 The scope for stakeholder involvement will vary by subject area. Stakeholders can participate by providing evidence of competition, and comment on which forms of regulatory intervention may be appropriate. For implementation activities, stakeholders may comment on operational details of how a policy is to work in practice. For monitoring activities, stakeholders may be involved eg as an end user in assessing comparative information produced by telcos. For all three stages of review, implementation and monitoring, Oftel will continue to ensure that progress towards the deadlines and outcomes set is maintained at an acceptable pace. 3.19 For the projects and programmes set out in Table 4 below, stakeholders were invited as part of the consultation process to indicate where they would like to be involved. As noted in Chapter 5 where responses indicated interest these have been passed to relevant project and programme managers. Advisory Committees on Telecommunications and consumer experts 3.20 The Telecommunications Act 1984 establishes a number of committees (the ACTs) to give advice to the Director General, to represent the interests of consumers, and to give emphasis to especially those with least power. The ACTs feed in suggestions at all stages of work to Oftel project managers to help Oftel focus on consumer concerns. 3.21 The ACTs respond to Oftel consultations, hold public meetings, meet the Director General and his senior staff, host seminars, participate in Oftel/industry working groups, liaise with other consumer organisations, and publish their views via an independent web site (www.acts.org.uk). They are supported by secretariats in Cardiff, Belfast and Edinburgh, and a small unit within Oftel (see project C9). 3.22 The ACTs are independent of Oftel. Their annual objectives and work plans are therefore not incorporated in Oftel’s management plan but are consulted on and published separately. For information please contact the ACT Secretariat on: e-mail: flora.pieris@oftel.gov.uk tel: 020 7634 5301. Table 4: Projects and programmes for 2002/3 – summary table
Business support F1) Human resources F2) Learning and development programme F3) Budget management programme F4) Business Assurance programme F5) Electronic records management system F6) IS and IT F7) Communicating Oftel's work to external audiences F8) Research and Information Unit List of proposed projects and programmes for 2002/3 Effective competition – benefiting consumers Reviews A1 EU market review programme Programme manager: Objective: To ensure that the effective competition reviews required when new EU Directives come into force are carried out in a timely and efficient manner. Provide ongoing assistance to project managers to ensure that Oftel strategy is applied consistently across reviews and that individual reviews are carried out in an efficient manner, identifying synergies across reviews as appropriate.
A2 Competition in mobile markets Programme Manager: Objective: To ensure effective progress towards the development of competition in mobile markets.
A3 Access to the radio spectrum Project Manager: Objective: To work with the Radiocommunications Agency (RA) and the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) policies to ensure that spectrum allocation policy and spectrum pricing promotes the economically efficient use of the radio spectrum; and to ensure spectrum is used to promote competition in the telecommunications market. To provide the competition advice regarding the use of radio spectrum as required by the Secretary of State under the 1984 Telecoms Act.
Above timings are dependent on the Radiocommunications Agency. A4 Competition in broadcasting markets Project Manager: Objective: To develop with OFCOM partners a policy framework for the promotion of competition in broadcasting markets and to promote understanding of Oftel’s regulatory role eg in regard to conditional access and access control, Electronic Programme Guides (EPGs) and terrestrial transmission. This project will have close links with the ITC and the OFT on the areas of overlapping responsibilities.
A5 Internet and e-commerce Programme Manager: Objective: To ensure that the UK regulatory framework is appropriate to encourage the development of the Internet, thereby helping the UK become a world leader in e-commerce.
Implementation A6 Strategy, development and implementation of broadband networks Programme Manager: Jim Niblett (tel:
020 7634 8750, e-mail: jim.niblett@oftel.gov.uk) Objective: To further develop and implement a strategy for competition in broadband access and services across the UK. To ensure that the rollout of local loop unbundling is in line with the relevant legislation. To monitor the rollout of BT’s ADSL products and to ensure that these are in line with regulatory requirements. To ensure that competition exists in the provision of partial private circuits for leased lines.
Partial private circuits (PPC)
Access to broadband
A7 Wholesale market for unmetered Internet access – Flat Rate Internet Access Call Origination (FRIACO) Project Manager: Objective: To ensure that BT complies with Oftel’s Directions in relation to FRIACO at BT’s local and regional exchanges, and to ensure that future arrangements for Internet traffic are robust and avoid congestion problems, including by facilitating progress on Internet Protocol (IP) interconnection for calls to Internet services. Key aspects:
A8 Numbering programme Programme Manager: Objective: To enable consumers to benefit from competition and new services by ensuring the provision of adequate numbers and numbering ranges. To promote customer choice in numbers and efficiency through pre-allocation and the introduction of individual number allocations. To promote the efficient management of numbers by operators through number charging.
A9 Directory enquiries implementation Project Manager:
A10 Carrier pre-selection (CPS) Project Manager: Objective: To ensure the continued successful implementation of permanent CPS.
Monitoring A11 Number portability Project Manager: Objective: To promote effective and sustainable competition in the fixed and mobile markets by ensuring that customers can retain their number(s) (if they wish to do so) when switching between providers of fixed or mobile services.
A12 Network interoperability programme Project Manager: Objective: To ensure that interoperability is effectively managed at network and customer interfaces, on the basis of co-regulation with the industry through the Network Interoperability Consultative Committee (NICC). To support the harmonisation of UK interface and interconnection standards. To support the work of various focus groups including the Operators Policy Forum.
Well informed consumers Implementation B1 Raising Consumer Awareness Programme Manager: Objective: To co-ordinate and optimise Oftel’s work in areas of consumer information including direct Oftel outputs and the encouragement of information from other sources.
B2 Comparable Performance Indicators (CPIs) Programme Manager: Objective: To help customers to make well-informed buying decisions by ensuring the availability of information on the quality of service of fixed and mobile telephony companies. To improve the availability, visibility and accessibility of this information by working with the industry and consumer groups on a self-regulatory basis.
Monitoring B3 Tariff Transparency Project Manager: Objective: To ensure consumers are
able to compare prices of telecoms services and develop policies that
ensure consumers can
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||