|
Contents
Statement
of accountability
Delivering
key results
Improving
performance
Consumer
focus
Managing
people
Electronic
government
Policy
and strategy
Technical
Annex
STATEMENT
OF ACOUNTABILITY
This SDA covers
the Office of Telecommunications (Oftel). The Director General of Telecommunications
is responsible for its delivery.

DELIVERING
KEY RESULTS
Oftels aim
is to provide the best possible deal for telecommunications customers
in terms of quality, choice and value for money through effective competition.
The following four outcome based objectives have been set to achieve
this:
- effective competition
in all main UK telecoms markets providing benefits in terms
of value for money to consumers in existing services and a wide range
of new and innovative services;
- well informed
consumers able to take advantage of choice;
- adequately protected
consumers;
- prevention of
all significant anti-competitive practices.
In pursuing these
objectives Oftel aims to regulate appropriately eg to avoid
over- regulation which while it could produce short term price reductions
would also lead to disincentives to invest, and to avoid under-regulation
in areas where competition is not in prospect. The balance between the
dangers of over and under regulating is likely to change over time as
the market becomes more competitive. The measures set out in this SDA
need to be understood in that light of developing markets ie the impact
of regulation needs to be seen in a longer term context.
Key Performance
targets
| Target |
Measures |
| 1.
Increase the extent to which the market is effectively competitive
or effective competition is in prospect.
Objective
1
|
We
will maintain a table of the main markets showing which of these
are not competitive, competition in prospect, competition achieved
(underpinned by a range of quantitative indicators) - the target
is for this table to indicate an increase in effective competition.
We will be
looking for evidence that competition is delivering benefits to
consumers:
- An increased
proportion of consumers for whom prices are set by competitive
forces rather than by price cap regulation
- Improved
value for money for consumers as seen by declining prices and
at least maintained quality of service
- UK moving
towards/maintaining a good relative position vis-à-vis other
competitor countries on price and quality
In the absence
of such evidence, we will act through the various levers set out
in our strategy to secure these benefits.
|
2.
Increase:
- The awareness
amongst consumers of the choices available to them;
- the availability
of useful information on price and quality comparisons provided
by the industry/private sector initiatives;
- the proportion
of consumers making well informed choices.
Objective
2
|
We
will be targeting an increase in the proportion of consumers:
- aware of
the fact there is a choice of supplier
- using advanced
services
- aware of
and using price & quality comparison information provided
by industry/private sector
|
3.
All consumers protected by:
- Effective
competition or regulation where competition is not effective;
- Ensuring
access to basic telecoms services at affordable prices on reasonable
request.
Objective
3
|
We
will be:
- Targeting
no real price increase for any significant group of residential
consumers for basic telephony
- Targeting
an increase in the number of residential consumers whose basic
telephony needs are being met
|
| 4.
Encourage and secure a reduction in significant anti-competitive
practice by taking effective action.
Objective
4
|
We
will be:
- Targeting
reductions in anti-competitive behaviour
- Targeting
completing rigorous investigations within time frames set to
be stretching but achievable
- Establishing
a basis for use of the Competition Act to prevent anti competitive
behaviour
|
| 5.
Spending on Oftel will deliver "value for money"* |
Improvements
in the rate of change of telecoms consumer benefits as measured
under Target 1 (eg in terms of price reductions, international comparisons,
increase in extent of competition) will exceed the rate of change
of Oftel funding. |
*see also sections
C.1 and C.2.
The key performance
targets include factors outside Oftel's direct control as many of the
targets relate to future market development and what happens in the
market is only in part a result of action taken by Oftel.
Details
of how Oftel intends to achieve its targets are given in the Oftel Strategy
Statement and Management Plan.
Objective 3 in particular
addresses issues of social and economic inclusion.
Measuring performance
Performance indicators
will be subject to internal checking. Most of the information is published
and hence subject to industry and consumer group scrutiny.

IMPROVING
PERFORMANCE
Strategies for
Improving Performance
Performance improvement
projects and programmes are normally specified in Oftels Management
Plan and are monitored on a quarterly basis. The key priorities of our
improvement programme include:
- A review of differences
in performance between the statutory utility regulators with a view
to improving performance by the end of 2001 (a new priority); The
review will focus on the report of external consultants into the efficiency
with which resources are used by each regulator and the identification
of best practice;
- The introduction
of a revised pay and grading system to support Oftels performance
management system.
Oftel will review
and implement, as appropriate, recommendations of the external efficiency
review and agree with HM Treasury by end March 2001 a timetable for
implementation.
A review of Oftels
ways of working and internal organisation was undertaken in 1998 and
a major restructuring of the department was carried out towards the
end of that year. The review covered all posts in Oftel.
Value for Money
Targets
Oftel's aim is to
provide the best deal for the consumer. We seek to deliver this outcome
in a cost effective way. The extent to which this goal is being achieved
can be monitored at a high level by considering the "benefits to
consumers" reflected in a range of measures ie:
- declining prices
- with quality monitored to ensure it is at least maintained
- maintaining or
achieving favourable rankings for UK consumers in international price
benchmarking comparisons
- an increasing
proportion of the telecoms market that is effectively competitive.
The effect of our
internal projects and programmes to help Oftel operate efficiently and
effectively (specified in the management plan and including IT, personnel
policy, training, budget management and knowledge management) together
with the external performance review (see section C.), will ensure Oftel
delivers the outcome for consumers in a more efficient way.
A broad measure
of the "value for money" that Oftel provides can be determined
by considering the "benefits to consumers" in relation to
Oftel's costs. Trends in consumer benefits will be tracked against changes
in Oftels funding, ie by comparing over time the average rate
of change in consumer benefits against the average rate of change of
Oftels costs.
However, it should
be noted that there are many factors outside Oftel's control that influence
the benefits seen by consumers.
Variations in
performance
Oftel is currently
being benchmarked, through an exercise commissioned by the Treasury,
against other utility regulators and against comparable organisation(s).
Further benchmarking will be carried out periodically.
Procurement
Oftel will work
closely with the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) to contribute to
economies of scale across government and will comply with OGC gateway
processes for all large, complex or novel projects. Key performance
indicators will be developed in consultation with the OGC from March
2001.
Fraud
Oftels fraud
policy was reviewed during 1999.

CONSUMER
FOCUS
Consumer complaints
The following output
targets have been set:
- Response for
written cases (letters, faxes and e-mails) within 5 working days.
- From October
2000 response time to E mails to be reduced to 24 hours wherever possible.
- Phone calls
same day resolution.

MANAGING
PEOPLE
Civil Service
Reform
As part of the civil
service Oftel aims to create a more open, diverse and professional organisation.
One in which people will put the publics interests first; innovate,
create and learn; take personal responsibility; work in partnership
with others; use new technology to deliver results of high quality and
good value; and maintain Investor in People accreditation.
Stronger leadership
with a clear sense of purpose
i.
Oftel will use the new leadership competencies (once be defined by the
Cabinet Office) for targeted recruitment/promotion.
ii
Because a key criterion for good leadership is self-awareness, Oftel
has extended 360-degree feedback and personal development programmes
to everyone in the Senior Civil Service (SCS).
Better business
planning
iii
Oftel ensures that key targets are owned by individuals and teams who
are accountable for their delivery, ensures that regular rigorous reviews
involving all managers are carried out to monitor progress against targets
and ensures that targets are cascaded down to Personal Forward Job Plans.
iv
The EFQM Excellence Model has been evaluated as a possible tool for
driving measurement and benchmarking, but we have decided to concentrate
our resources on maintaining our Investor in People status achieved
in October 1999. We are due for a post recognition review in November
2000.
v
Oftel consults annually with stakeholders (including consumers and the
telecoms industry) on its draft Management Plan. The external efficiency
review of utility regulators, referred to earlier, will involve a review
of business planning.
Sharper performance
management
vi. Oftel will work
towards new pay and appraisal systems, drawing on the work the Public
Services Productivity Panel is doing with several departments/agencies.
The new system for the SCS (under development by the Cabinet Office)
will be introduced as soon as possible.
vii. Oftel has redirected
its training programme to support the capability of managers at all
levels to manage performance. The programme will be further improved
drawing on best practice.
A dramatic
improvement in diversity
viii Oftel has produced
an action plan (to include staff training and detailed diversity monitoring)
and will prepare six-monthly reports on progress made against the recommendations
of the Diversity Group Report (including equality-proofing its processes,
especially for recruitment, appraisal and promotion).
A more open
Civil Service which brings on talent
ix. Oftel will support
a new drive to increase departmental interchange targets for
secondments in and out at all levels, and to raise the existing target
(that by 2005 50 per cent of the SCS should have had experience outside
the Civil Service) to 65 per cent.
x. Oftel regularly
recruits through open competitions and will continue to bring in new
thinking and people who have skills that are currently in short supply
in the Service.
xi. Oftel will continue
to actively talent spot and to improve its staff
development programme.
xii. To open up
mobility between departments, Oftel will work with the Cabinet Office
to ensure that Oftels vacancies can be posted on a new Civil Service
website.
xiii. Oftel gives
its best and most promising performers experience in areas of frontline
delivery, and will set the presumption that in the future to reach the
SCS, people will have had experience both of frontline delivery or operational
management and of working in more than one culture.
A better deal
for staff
xiv. Oftel will
regularly look for improvements in the deal that it is offering to staff.
A pay and banding review is currently under way proposals for change
will be drawn up by early 2001. This will include non-financial rewards.
Sickness absence
and ill health retirement
i. Oftel will aim
to reduce sickness absence to 4.7 days sickness per staff year by 2001
and to 4.2 days by 2003.
ii. Oftel will work
towards the Cabinet Office target of 3.72 ill health retirements per
1,000 staff.

ELECTRONIC
GOVERNMENT
Oftel will contribute
to the Government target for electronic delivery of services: 100% of
dealings with government should be capable of electronic delivery by
2005.

POLICY
AND STRATEGY
Oftel's Strategy
Statement sets out our approach to devising policy through a process
of regular market and consumer protection reviews, key features of which
will be:
- Full consultation
with stakeholders;
- Evaluation of
a wide range of measures of effective competition;
- Use of a cost-benefit
framework for taking decisions regarding regulatory action;
- Encouraging self
and co-regulation across all relevant policy areas.
October 2000

Oftel
SERVICE DELIVERY AGREEMENT 2001-04 - Technical Annex
The
following table sets out the full technical details of how the SDA for
Oftel will be measured.
| Target |
Technical
note |
| 1.
Increase the extent to which the market is effectively competitive
or effective competition is in prospect.
Objective
1
|
|
- We will
maintain a table of the main markets showing which of these
are not competitive, competition in prospect, competition achieved
(underpinned by a range of quantitative indicators) - the target
is for this table to indicate an increase in effective competition.
|
We
will set a base line for April 2001 which sets out, for each of
the main market sectors, the state of the market sub-sections (ie
Non Competitive, Competition in Prospect or Competitive) and the
associated industry turnover. During each market review (as described
in management plan) we will, for each segment of the relevant market,
determine the current competitive "state" of the market
and the associated turnover. Comparison with the April 2001 baseline
will enable us to measure the progress towards effective competition.
It is useful
to consider 2 measures:
1. the turnover
associated with markets that are competitive (expect to increase
over time)
2. the turnover
associated with markets that are either competitive or competition
in prospect (expect to increase over time)
Source: information
collected as part of the market reviews
|
- An increased
proportion of consumers for whom prices are set by competitive
forces rather than by price cap regulation
|
The
number of consumers buying telephony services not covered by price
caps as a proportion of all telephony consumers will be monitored
(note only fixed "PSTN" services will be considered for
this).
Source: "Market
Information" published by Oftel
|
- Improved
value for money for consumers as seen by declining prices and
at least maintained quality of service
|
We
will measure price declines on a % basis both for individual markets
and for the overall market.
Sources include:
market information published by Oftel and specific price monitoring
studies.
Quality will
be monitored to ensure this is maintained at a reasonable level.
Key indicators are:
Mobile: %
of calls connected and completed successfully
PSTN: faults
per line and complaint handling
|
- UK moving
towards/maintaining a good relative position vis-à-vis other
competitor countries on price and quality
|
For
all of the main markets we will look to evaluate the UK benchmarking
outcome on a scale of 1-5 (with 1 = poor and 5 = very good) taking
into account: the UK ranking, the gap between the UK and the cheapest
other country, the extent to which results are spread or clustered.
We will monitor this "score" over time (both for each
service and in terms of an overall average)
Source: Oftel
benchmarking studies plus other public sources
|
2.
Increase:
- The awareness
amongst consumers of the choices available to them;
- the availability
of useful information on price and quality comparisons provided
by the industry/private sector initiatives;
- the proportion
of consumers making well informed choices.
Objective
2
|
|
- Targeting
an increase in the proportion of consumers aware of the fact
there is a choice of supplier
|
Oftel
market research will ask consumers about their awareness of alternative
suppliers |
- Targeting
an increase in the proportion of consumers using advanced services
|
Initially
we will consider fast internet access as an example of an "advanced
service" and take up of this will be monitored through our
market research. Other advanced services will be included as appropriate. |
- Targeting
an increase in the proportion of consumers aware of and using
price & quality comparison information provided by industry/private
sector
|
We
will monitor awareness and use of CPIs and phonebills.org.
Source: Oftel
market research and website "hits".
|
3.
All consumers protected by:
- Effective
competition or regulation where competition is not effective;
- Ensuring
access to basic telecoms services at affordable prices on reasonable
request.
Objective
3
|
|
- Targeting
no real price increase for any significant group of residential
consumers for basic telephony
|
No
significant group of BT residential customers to experience any
real increase in their bill over the price control period (based
on same usage and normal calling pattern).
Monitored
as part of the price control monitoring.
|
- Targeting
an increase in the number of residential consumers whose basic
telephony needs are being met
|
Percentage
of consumers who are satisfied with their current calling method
will be monitored through Oftel's market research.
Data on disconnection
rates and take up of special schemes (such as the low user scheme)
will also be presented as these are also relevant to this measure
|
| 4.
Encourage and secure a reduction in significant anti-competitive
practice by taking effective action.
Objective
4
|
|
- Targeting
reductions in anti-competitive behaviour
|
We
will analyse the competition complaints that we receive and monitor
the extent to which complaints recur - the target is to reduce any
recurrence (ie once action has been taken, it is effective in deterring
similar behaviour in future). |
- Targeting
completing rigorous investigations within time frames set to
be stretching but achievable
|
The
current targets are: Complete preliminary enquiry in 30 working
days for competition cases. Complete 80% of investigations within
a further 6 months and all within one year.
This is monitored
by Oftel
|
- Establishing
a basis for use of the Competition Act to prevent anti competitive
behaviour
|
Oftel
will provide further clarity to stakeholders as to when and where
we will use our Competition Act Powers, taking full account of changes
to the EU and UK frameworks, and is aiming to publish a statement
in Feb 2001. Measures to monitor compliance with the published statement
will then be constructed and reported. |
| 5.
Spending on Oftel will deliver "value for money" |
|
- Improvements
in the rate of change of telecoms consumer benefits as measured
under Target 1 (eg in terms of price reductions, international
comparisons, increase in extent of competition) will exceed
the rate of change of Oftel funding.
|
The
intention is to present the rate of change for the 3 measures reported
under Target 1 considering price reduction, international comparisons
and extent of competition compared to the percentage increase in
Oftel funding.
The relationship
between consumer benefits and Oftel costs is complex and involves
time lags. It is more meaningful to consider the trend over a
period, rather than considering individual years. The measure
will, therefore, be calculated on the basis of a 3 year moving
average to provide some smoothing. Note lack of historic data
for some of these measures will mean that initial reporting will
focus on establishing the baseline.
Note the rate
of change of Oftel funding will reflect efficiency gains arising
from the implementation of recommendations of the external efficiency
review.
|
CSR PSA targets
- relating these to SDA targets
The
following lists Oftel's CSR PSA targets, comments on whether these are
completed/ outstanding etc and then indicates how/if these are covered
by the SDA targets.
|
CSR
PSA target
|
Completed/
Outstanding
etc
|
Covered
by which SDA target?
|
| i)
Work with DTI to attempt to achieve changes to European Community
telecommunications law that secure promotion of competition and
consumer protection. Input to review in 1999-2000 |
Input
to 1999/2000 review will be completed before SDA comes into effect. |
Although
work will continue in this type of area, this is no longer directly
reflected in one of the SDA targets. The output of this work will
contribute to our achievement of targets 1 and 3. |
| ii)
Long term strategy for Oftels achievement of its goal and
objectives to be developed and published by autumn 1999 |
Achieved
|
The
new targets are consistent with the implementation of the strategy |
| iii)
Policy statement on the review of competition in the mobile market
to be published by summer 1999.
iv) Identify
whether there is a need for regulatory action in order to bring
higher bandwidth services to the customer and statement of responses
to consultation published by summer 1999.
|
Achieved |
SDA
Target 1 now relates to an outcome (an increase in the extent
to which the market is effectively competitive) rather than the
process of identifying the regulatory action required. |
| v)
Complete preliminary enquiry in 30 working days for competition
cases. Complete 75% of investigations within a further six months,
and all within one year |
Ongoing |
SDA
Target 4 includes this as a delivery measure. |
vi)
Monitor price control requirements:
- Weighted
average price of BTs basket of services to fall by at
least RPI 4.5% each year (where weights used relate to
revenues from lowest spending 80% of BTs residential customers)
- no BT residential
customer to experience any real increase in their bill over
the price control period (based on the same usage and normal
calling pattern). Annually to July 2001
|
Ongoing |
SDA
Targets 1 and 3 include price monitoring as delivery measures.
|
| vii)
Review of need for new price controls on BT from August 2001 and
publish initial consultation document by autumn 1999 |
Initial
milestone achieved |
SDA
Target 1 now relates to an outcome (an increase in the number
of market sectors which are effectively competitive) rather than
the process of identifying the regulatory action required. |
| viii)
Ensure publication of price comparison information for residential
customers of fixed link telecommunications companies by summer 1999 |
Target
met Autumn 1999 |
SDA
Target 2 has delivery measures concerned with the outcome of whether
consumers are aware of and using this type of information. |
| ix)
Improve the responsiveness of the telecommunications industry to
customer needs by reviewing progress each year in the UK telecoms
market, and by assessing how a range of different customers
in both residential and business sectors are doing in getting
the best deal from telecommunications. |
Ongoing |
As
part of the process of regular market reviews we will be assessing
the extent to which consumers are getting the "best deal"
from telecommunications. The outcome of these reviews is reflected
in SDA Target 1. |


|