Layout image
 
Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Competition Bulletin: Closed Cases: Case reference: CW/00550/03/03 Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision of overflow capacity for DQ118xxx traffic

Complainant: Cable and Wireless (C&W)
Complaint against: BT
Case opened: 27 August 2002
Case closed: 24 March 2003
Issue: Dispute between C&W and BT over the provision of overflow capacity for DQ118 traffic.
Relevant Instrument: Regulation 6(6) of the Telecommunications (Interconnection) Regulations 1997

C&W referred this dispute to Oftel in August 2002. BT had agreed to carry directory enquiry traffic using the new 118 code ("DQ118" traffic) destined for termination on C&W's network on the interconnect capacity between BT's and C&W's networks already used to carry C&W's number translation services ('NTS') traffic. However, BT refused to provide alternative routing ('overflow') for this DQ 118 traffic terminating on C&W's network.

The provision of a facility for overflow was requested by C&W to ensure that DQ118 calls carried on BT's network for termination on C&W's network do not fail due to congestion at the designated point of interconnection. BT argued that it should not be required to offer this service.

It appeared to Oftel that if BT refused to provide overflow for DQ118 traffic it would lead to BT's downstream activities having an unreasonable competitive advantage. Oftel was also concerned that a failure to provide overflow would either lead to more calls from end-users failing than would otherwise be the case or may result in inefficient over-dimensioning of links in order to cope with network congestion.

Having considered the arguments of the parties, Oftel determined that BT should be required to provide alternative routing for DQ118 traffic from one BT switch interconnected with the C&W network to another such switch connection where C&W has ensured that relevant interconnect links from such switches are provided to a sufficiently high grade of service.

The final direction can be viewed on Oftel's website at http://www.oftel.gov.uk/publications/consumer/2003/dqoflow0303.htm


Case leader: Katherine Dinsdale (020 7634 5358 e-mail: katherine.dinsdale@oftel.gov.uk)
Case reference: CW/00550/03/03

Text Published when the case was opened.

BT: denial of overflow capacity for DQ 118xxx traffic

Complainant: Cable & Wireless
Case opened: 27 August 2002
Issue: Whether BT should be required to provide overflow capacity for DQ118 traffic that is routed on NTS
Relevant instrument: Regulation 6(6) of the Telecommunications (Interconnection) Regulations 1997

Oftel has received a request from Cable & Wireless to determine whether or not BT should provide overflow capacity for DQ118 traffic that is routed on NTS.

BT has agreed to a request from Cable & Wireless to route DQ118 traffic over NTS routes but has asked Cable & Wireless to submit a separate routing plan for DQ118 traffic rather than add DQ118 numbers to its existing routing plan. It is alleged that this is because BT is unwilling to provide overflow capacity for DQ118 traffic which it currently provides for Cable & Wireless's existing NTS traffic.
Oftel is considering the issue.

Case leader: Katherine Dinsdale (020 7634 5358 e-mail: katherine.dinsdale@oftel.gov.uk)
Case reference: CW/00550/08/02

 

Layout image
Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image