|
Annex
A
NOTIFICATION
OF PROPOSALS UNDER REGULATION 6 OF THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS (MARKET
ANALYSIS) REGUALTIONS 2003
Proposal
for identifying a market, making a market power determination and the
setting of market power conditions
1. The Director General of Telecommunications
(‘the Director’), in accordance with Regulation 6 of the Electronic
Communications (Market Analysis) Regulations 2003 ("the Regulations")
hereby makes the following proposals for identifying markets, making
market power determinations and the setting of market power conditions.
2. The Director is proposing to identify
the markets set out in Schedule 1 to this Notification for the purpose
of making market power determinations.
3. The Director is proposing to make market
power determinations that the following persons have significant market
power in relation to the markets referred to in paragraph 2 above:
(a) in relation to the markets set out
in Schedule 1, Part 1 British Telecommunications plc, whose registered
company number is 01800000, and any British Telecommunications plc
subsidiary or holding company, or any subsidiary of that holding company,
all as defined in section 736 of the Companies Act 1985 as amended
by the Companies Act 1989;
(b) in relation to the markets set out
in Schedule 1, Part 2 Cable and Wireless plc, whose registered company
number is 00238525 and any Cable and Wireless plc subsidiary or holding
company, or any subsidiary of that holding company, all as defined
in section 736 of the Companies Act 1985 as amended by the Companies
Act 1989; and
4. The Director is proposing to set market
power conditions on the persons referred to in paragraph 3 above as
set out in Schedules 2 and 3 to this Notification.
5. The effect of, and the Director’s reasons
for making, the proposals to identify the markets set out in paragraph
2 above are contained in Chapter Two of the consultation document published
with this Notification.
6. The effect of, and the Director’s reasons
for making, the proposals to make the market power determinations set
out in paragraph 3 above are contained in Chapter Three of the consultation
document published with this Notification.
7. The effect of, and the Director’s
reasons for making, the proposals to set the market power conditions
set out in Schedule 2 and 3 to this Notification are contained in Chapter
Four of the consultation document published with this Notification.
8. In considering whether to make the proposals
set out in this Notification, and in analysing the markets referred
to in paragraph 2 above, the Director has:
(a) had regard to all applicable guidelines
and recommendations which have been issued or made by the European
Commission in pursuance of a Community instrument, and relate to market
identification and analysis or the determination of what constitutes
significant market power, in accordance with Regulation 5(2) of the
Regulations; and
(b) complied with all relevant requirements
set out in Regulation 6(8) of the Regulations.
9. The Director consider that the proposed
market power conditions referred to in paragraph 4 above comply with,
and are necessary for satisfying requirements in, the provisions of
the Directives, as appropriate and relevant to each of such market power
conditions, referred to in Regulation 6(8) of the Regulations.
10. Representations may be made to the
Director about any of the proposals set out in this Notification and
the accompanying consultation document by 30 April 2003.
11. Copies of this Notification have been
sent to the Secretary of State, the European Commission, and such of
the regulatory authorities of other member States as the Director thinks
fit.
DAVID ALBERT EDMONDS
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
14 March 2003

Schedule 1
Part 1
Markets for which the Director
proposes that BT has SMP
|
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica Australian Territory
Armenia
Aruba
Benin
Bhutan
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo
Congo,
DR
Côte d'Ivoire
Cuba
Diego Garcia
Djibouti
East Timor
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Faroe Islands
Fiji
French Guiana
French
Polynesia
Gabon
Georgia
Gibraltar
Greenland
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Haiti
Honduras
Iraq
Khabarovsk
Kiribati
Korea, PDR
Kirgizstan
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
|
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Micronesia
Midway Islands
Moldova
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nakhodka
Namibia
Nauru
New Caledonia
Niger
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Marianas
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Puerto Rico
Reunion
Rodriguez Islands
Romania
Ross Island
Rwanda
Saint Kitts & Nevis
Saint Pierre & Miquelon
Sakhalin
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Solomon Islands
Somalia
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Tajikistan
Tatarstan
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tristan Da Cunha
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Virgin Islands (US)
Wake Island
Wallis & Futuna
Ellipso
Emsat
Inmarsat
Iridium
Thuraya
|
Part 2
Markets for which the Director proposes
that C&W has SMP
Andorra
Ascension Island
Montserrat
Turks & Caicos

Schedule
2
The
conditions imposed on British Telecommunications plc and its subsidiaries
under regulation 6(4) of the Electronic Communications (Market Analysis)
Regulations 2003 as a result of the analysis of the markets in Schedule
1, Part 1 in which British Telecommunications plc and its subsidiaries
has been found to have significant market power
Part 1: Definitions and Interpretation
of these conditions
1. These conditions shall apply to the
markets set out in Schedule 1, Part 1.
2. For the purpose of interpreting the
conditions imposed on the Dominant Provider following the review of
the markets listed in paragraph 1 the following definitions shall apply:
"Act" means the Communications
Act 2003;
"Access Charge Change Notice"
has the meaning given to it by Condition KA4.2;
"Director" means the Director
General of Telecommunications appointed under section 1 of the Telecommunications
Act 1984;
"Dominant Provider" means British
Telecommunications plc, whose registered company number is 01800000
and any British Telecommunications plc subsidiary or holding company,
or any subsidiary of that holding company, all as defined by Section
736 of the Companies Act 1985 as amended by the Companies Act 1989;
"Reference Offer" means the
terms and conditions on which the Dominant Provider is willing to
enter into an Access Contract; and
"Third Party" means person"
Except insofar as the context otherwise
requires, words or expressions shall have the meaning assigned to them
and otherwise any word or expression shall have the same meaning as
it has in the Act.
4. The Interpretation
Act 1978 shall apply as if each of the conditions were an Act of Parliament.
5. Headings and titles
shall be disregarded.
Part 2: The conditions
Condition KA1 – Requirement to provide
network access on reasonable request
KA1.1 The Dominant Provider shall provide
Network Access to every Third Party who reasonably requests in writing
such Network Access and such Network Access as the Director may direct
from time to time.
KA1.2 The provision of Network Access
in accordance with paragraph 1 shall occur as soon as reasonably practicable
and shall be provided on fair and reasonable terms, conditions and charges
and on such terms, conditions and charges as the Director may from time
to time direct.
KA1.3 The Dominant Provider shall comply
with any direction the Director may make from time to time under this
Condition.
Condition KA2 – Requirement not to unduly
discriminate
KA2.1 The Dominant Provider shall not
unduly discriminate against particular persons or against a particular
description of persons, in relation to matters connected with Network
Access provided in accordance with Condition 1.1
KA2.2 In this Condition the Dominant
Provider may be deemed to have shown undue discrimination if it unfairly
favours to a material extent an activity carried on by it so as to place
at a competitive disadvantage persons competing with the Dominant Provider.
Condition KA3 – Requirement to publish
a reference offer
KA3.1 Except in so far as the Director
may otherwise consent in writing, the Dominant Provider shall publish
a Reference Offer and act in the manner set out below.
KA3.2 Subject to paragraph 7 below,
the Dominant Provider shall ensure that a Reference Offer in relation
to the provision of Network Access includes at least the following:
(a) a description of the Network Access
to be provided, including technical characteristics (which shall include
information on network configuration where necessary to make effective
use of Network Access);
(b) the locations of the points of Network Access;
(c) the technical standards for Network
Access (including any usage restrictions and other security issues);
(d) the conditions for access to ancillary,
supplementary and advanced services (including operational support systems,
information systems or databases for pre-ordering, provisioning, ordering,
maintenance and repair requests and billing);
(e) any ordering and provisioning procedures;
(f) relevant charges, terms of payment
and billing procedures;
(g) details of interoperability tests;
(h) details of traffic and network management;
(i) details of maintenance and quality
as follows:
i. specific time scales for the
acceptance or refusal of a request for supply and for completion,
testing and hand-over or delivery of services and facilities, for
provision of support services (such as fault handling and repair);
ii. service level commitments,
namely the quality standards that each party must meet when performing
its contractual obligations;
iii. the amount of compensation
payable by one party to another for failure to perform contractual
commitments;
iv. a definition and limitation
of liability and indemnity; and
v. procedures in the event of alterations
being proposed to the service offerings, for example, launch of new
services, changes to existing services or change to prices;
(j) details of measures to ensure compliance with requirements
for network integrity;
(k) details of any
relevant intellectual property rights;
(l) a dispute resolution procedure
to be used between the parties;
(m) details of duration
and renegotiation of agreements;
(n) provisions regarding
confidentiality of non-public parts of the agreements;
(o) rules of allocation
between the parties when supply is limited (for example, for the purpose
of co-location or location of masts);
(p) the standard
terms and conditions for the provision of Network Access;
(q) to the extent
that the Dominant Provider provides to itself Network Access that:
i. is the same,
similar or equivalent to that provided to any other person; or
ii. may be used
for a purpose that is the same, similar or equivalent to that provided
to any other person,
in a manner that differs from that detailed
in a Reference Offer in relation to Network Access provided to any other
person, the Dominant Provider shall ensure that it publishes a Reference
Offer in relation to the Network Access that it provides to itself which
includes, where relevant, at least those matters detailed in paragraphs
KA3.2(a)-(p).
KA3.3 The Dominant Provider shall, by
25 August 2003, publish a Reference Offer in relation to any Network
Access that it is providing as at 25 July 2003.
KA3.4 The Dominant Provider shall update
the Reference Offer in relation to any amendments or in relation to
any further Network Access provided after 25 July 2003.
KA3.5 Publication referred to in paragraphs
KA3.2, KA3.3 and KA3.4 above shall be effected by:
(a)
placing a copy of the Reference Offer on any relevant website operated
or controlled by the Dominant Provider; and
(b)
sending a copy of the Reference Offer to the Director.
KA3.6 The Dominant Provider shall send
a copy of the current version of the Reference Offer to any person at
that person’s written request (or such parts which have been requested).
KA3.7 The Dominant Provider shall make
such modifications to the Reference Offer as the Director may direct
from time to time.
KA3.8 The Dominant Provider shall provide
Network Access at the charges, terms and conditions in the relevant
Reference Offer and shall not depart therefrom either directly or indirectly.
KA3.9 The Dominant Provider shall comply
with any determination the Director may make from time under this condition
Condition KA4 – Requirement to
notify prices
KA4.1 Except in so far as the Director
may otherwise consent in writing, the Dominant Provider shall publish
charges, terms and conditions and act in the manner set out below.
KA4.2 The Dominant Provider shall send
to the Director and to every person with which it has entered into an
Access Contract covered by to Condition KA1 a written notice of any
amendment to the charges, terms and conditions on which it provides
Network Access or in relation to any charges for new Network Access
(an "Access Charge Change Notice") not less than 28 days before
any such amendment comes into effect.
KA4.3 The Dominant Provider shall ensure
that an Access Charge Change Notice includes:
(a) a description of the Network Access
in question;
(b) a reference to the location in the
Dominant Provider’s current Reference Offer of the terms and conditions
associated with the provision of that Network Access;
(c) the date
on which or the period for which any amendments to charges, terms
and conditions will take effect (the "effective date").
KA4.4 The Dominant Provider shall not
apply any new charge, term or condition identified in an Access Charge
Change Notice before the effective date.
KA4.5 To the extent that the Dominant Provider
provides to itself Network Access that:
i.
is the same, similar or equivalent to that provided to any other person;
or
ii. may be used
for a purpose that is the same, similar or equivalent to that provided
to any other person,
in a manner that differs from that detailed
in an Access Charge Change Notice in relation to Network Access provided
to any other person, the Dominant Provider shall ensure that it sends
to the Director an Access Charge Change Notice in relation to the Network
Access that it provides to itself which includes, where relevant, at
least those matters detailed in paragraphs KA4.3(a)-(c).
Schedule
3
The
conditions imposed on Cable and Wireless plc and its subsidiaries under
regulation 6(4) of the Electronic Communications (Market Analysis) Regulations
2003 as a result of the analysis of the markets in Schedule 1, Part
2 in which Cable and Wireless plc and its subsidiaries has been found
to have significant market power
Part 1: Definitions and Interpretation
of these conditions
1. These conditions shall apply to the
markets set out in Schedule 1, Part 1.
2. For the purpose of interpreting the
conditions imposed on the Dominant Provider following the review of
the markets listed in paragraph 1 the following definitions shall apply:
"Act" means the Communications
Act 2003;
"Access Charge Change Notice"
has the meaning given to it in Condition KB4.2;
"Director" means the Director
General of Telecommunications appointed under section 1 of the Telecommunications
Act 1984;
"Dominant Provider" means Cable
and Wireless plc, whose registered company number is 00238525, and
any Cable and Wireless plc subsidiary or holding company, or any subsidiary
of that holding company, all as defined by Section 736 of the Companies
Act 1985 as amended by the Companies Act 1989;
"Reference Offer" means the
terms and conditions on which the Dominant Provider is willing to
enter into an Access Contract; and
"Third Party" means person.
3. Except insofar as the context otherwise
requires, words or expressions shall have the meaning assigned to them
and otherwise any word or expression shall have the same meaning as
it has in the Act.
4. The Interpretation
Act 1978 shall apply as if each of the conditions were an Act of Parliament.
5. Headings and titles
shall be disregarded.
Part 2: The conditions
Condition KB1 – Requirement to provide
network access on reasonable request
KB1.1 The Dominant Provider shall provide
Network Access to every Third Party who reasonably requests in writing
such Network Access and such Network Access as the Director may direct
from time to time.
KB1.2 The provision of Network Access
in accordance with paragraph 1 shall occur as soon as reasonably practicable
and shall be provided on fair and reasonable terms, conditions and charges
and on such terms, conditions and charges as the Director may from time
to time direct.
KB1.3 The Dominant Provider shall comply
with any direction the Director may make from time to time under this
Condition.
Condition KB2 – Requirement not to unduly
discriminate
KB2.1 The Dominant Provider shall not
unduly discriminate against particular persons or against a particular
description of persons, in relation to matters connected with Network
Access provided in accordance with Condition 1.1
KB2.2 In this Condition the Dominant
Provider may be deemed to have shown undue discrimination if it unfairly
favours to a material extent an activity carried on by it so as to place
at a competitive disadvantage persons competing with the Dominant Provider.
Condition KB3 – Requirement to publish
a reference offer
KB3.1 Except in so far as the Director
may otherwise consent in writing, the Dominant Provider shall publish
a Reference Offer and act in the manner set out below.
KB3.2 Subject to paragraph 7 below,
the Dominant Provider shall ensure that a Reference
Offer in relation to the provision of Network Access includes at least
the following:
(a) a description of the Network Access
to be provided, including technical characteristics (which shall include
information on network configuration where necessary to make effective
use of Network Access);
(b) the locations of the points of Network
Access;
(c) the technical standards for Network
Access (including any usage restrictions and other security issues);
(d) the conditions for access to ancillary,
supplementary and advanced services (including operational support systems,
information systems or databases for pre-ordering, provisioning, ordering,
maintenance and repair requests and billing);
(e) any ordering and provisioning procedures;
(f) relevant charges, terms of payment
and billing procedures;
(g) details of interoperability tests;
(h) details of traffic and network management;
(i) details of maintenance and quality
as follows:
(i) specific time scales for the acceptance
or refusal of a request for supply and for completion, testing and
hand-over or delivery of services and facilities, for provision of
support services (such as fault handling and repair);
(ii) service level commitments, namely
the quality standards that each party must meet when performing its
contractual obligations;
(iii) the amount of compensation payable
by one party to another for failure to perform contractual commitments;
(iv) a definition and limitation of
liability and indemnity; and
(v) procedures in the event of alterations
being proposed to the service offerings, for example, launch of new
services, changes to existing services or change to prices;
(j) details of measures to
ensure compliance with requirements for network integrity;
(k) details of any
relevant intellectual property rights;
(l) a dispute resolution
procedure to be used between the parties;
(m) details of duration
and renegotiation of agreements;
(n) provisions regarding
confidentiality of non-public parts of the agreements;
(o) rules of allocation
between the parties when supply is limited (for example, for the purpose
of co-location or location of masts);
(p) the standard
terms and conditions for the provision of Network Access;
(q)
to
the extent that the Dominant Provider provides to itself Network Access
that:
ii. is the same,
similar or equivalent to that provided to any other person; or
iii. may be used
for a purpose that is the same, similar or equivalent to that provided
to any other person,
in a manner that differs from that detailed
in a Reference Offer in relation to Network Access provided to any other
person, the Dominant Provider shall ensure that it publishes a Reference
Offer in relation to the Network Access that it provides to itself which
includes, where relevant, at least those matters detailed in paragraphs
KB3.2(a)-(p).
KB3.3 The Dominant Provider shall, by
25 August 2003, publish a Reference Offer in relation to any Network
Access that it is providing as at 25 July 2003.
KB3.4 The Dominant Provider shall update
the Reference Offer in relation to any amendments or in relation to
any further Network Access provided after 25 July 2003.
KB3.5 Publication referred to in paragraphs
KB3.2, KB3.3 and KB3.4 above shall be effected by:
(a) placing a
copy of the Reference Offer on any relevant website operated or controlled
by the Dominant Provider; and
(b) sending a
copy of the Reference Offer to the Director.
KB3.6 The Dominant Provider shall send
a copy of the current version of the Reference Offer to any person at
that person’s written request (or such parts which have been requested).
KB3.7 The Dominant Provider shall make
such modifications to the Reference Offer as the Director may direct
from time to time.
KB3.8 The Dominant Provider shall provide
Network Access at the charges, terms and conditions in the relevant
Reference Offer and shall not depart therefrom either directly or
indirectly.
KB3.9 The Dominant Provider shall comply
with any direction the Director may make from time to time under this
Condition.
Condition KB4 – Requirement to notify
prices
KB4.1 Except in so far as the Director
may otherwise consent in writing, the Dominant Provider shall publish
charges terms and conditions and act in the manner set out below.
KB4.2 The Dominant Provider shall send
to the Director and to every person with which it has entered into an
Access Contract covered by to Condition KB1 a written notice of any
amendment to the charges, terms and conditions on which it provides
Network Access or in relation to any charges for new Network Access
(an "Access Charge Change Notice") not less than 28 days before
any such amendment comes into effect.
KB4.3 The Dominant Provider shall ensure
that an Access Charge Change Notice includes:
(a) a description of the Network Access
in question;
(b) a reference to the location in the
Dominant Provider’s current Reference Offer of the terms and conditions
associated with the provision of that Network Access;
(c) the date on which or the period for
which any amendments to charges, terms and conditions will take effect
(the "effective date").
KB4.4 The Dominant Provider shall not
apply any new charge, term and condition identified in an Access Charge
Change Notice before the effective date.
KB4.5 To the extent that the Dominant Provider
provides to itself Network Access that:
i.
is the same, similar or equivalent to that provided to any other person;
or
ii.
may be used for a purpose that is the same, similar or equivalent
to that provided to any other person,
in a manner that differs from that detailed
in an Access Charge Change Notice in relation to Network Access provided
to any other person, the Dominant Provider shall ensure that it sends
to the Director an Access Charge Change Notice in relation to the Network
Access that it provides to itself which includes, where relevant, at
least those matters detailed in paragraphs KB4.3(a)-(c).
Annex B
Draft
Direction – Cable and Wireless plc
Draft Direction
under proposed Conditions KB3 imposed on Cable and Wireless plc (C&W)
as a result of the market power determinations proposed to be made by
the Director that C&W has significant market power in certain wholesale
international services markets (set out in the Schedule to this Direction)
WHEREAS:
(a) as a result
of a market review carried out by the Director under regulation 6 of
the Regulations, C&W was found to have significant market power
in the certain wholesale international services markets (set out in
the Schedule to this Direction);
(b) the Director
having confirmed his proposals pursuant to regulation 8 of the Regulations
to make market power determinations to the effect referred to in recital
(A) above and to set certain SMP conditions on C&W to take effect
on 25 July 2003, including Condition KB3 imposing obligations concerning
the publication of a Reference Offer;
(c) this Direction
concerns Condition KB3;
(d) Condition KB3.1
provides that except in so far as the Director may otherwise consent
in writing, the Dominant Provider shall publish a Reference Offer;
(e) for the reasons
set out in the statement accompanying this Direction, the Director is
satisfied that, in accordance with section 45(2) of the Act, this Direction
is:
i. objectively justifiable
in relation to the networks, services, facilities, apparatus or directories
to which it relates;
ii. not such as to discriminate
unduly against particular persons or against a particular description
of persons;
iii. proportionate to
what it is intended to achieve; and
iv. in relation to what
it is intended to achieve, transparent;
(f) for the reasons
set out in the statement accompanying this Direction, the Director is
satisfied that he has acted in accordance with the relevant Community
requirements set out in section 4 of the Act;
(g) a notification
of this Direction has been carried out in accordance with section 45
of the Act;
(h) the Director
has considered every representation about this Direction made to him
within the specified consultation period; and
NOW, therefore, pursuant to Conditions
KB3 of Schedule 2 to the Notification the Director makes the following
Direction:
1.For the purposes of complying with its
obligations under paragraph KB3.1 of Condition KB3, the Director consents
that until further notice C&W shall not be obliged to publish a
Reference Offer in accordance with Condition KB3.1 of Condition KB3
and that Conditions KB3.2 to KB3.8 of Condition KB3 shall not apply.
For the avoidance of doubt, Condition KB3.9 of Condition KB3 shall continue
to apply.
2. For the purpose of interpreting
this Direction, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) "Act" means the Communications
Act 2003;
(b) "C&W" means Cable
and Wireless plc, whose registered company
number is 00238525, and any of its subsidiaries or holding companies,
or any subsidiary of such holding companies, all as defined by section
736 of the Companies Act 1985, as amended by the Companies Act 1989;
(c) "Director" means the
Director General of Telecommunications as appointed under section 1
of the Telecommunications Act 1984;
(d) "Notification" means
the notification of proposals under regulation 6 of the Regulations
for identifying inter alia wholesale international services markets
for the purpose of making proposed market power determinations that
C&W has significant market power in relation to certain markets
(set out in the Schedule to this Direction), as published on the same
day as this Direction is published and as annexed to the consultation
document accompanying this Direction;
(e) "Regulations" mean
the Electronic Communications (Market Analysis) Regulations 2003 (S.I.
2003/330); and
(f) "significant market power"
has the meaning given to it in regulation 5(3) to (7) of the Regulations.
3. Except insofar as the context otherwise
requires, words or expressions shall have the meaning assigned to them
in paragraph 2 above and otherwise any word or expression shall have
the same meaning as it has in the Notification or, if the context so
permits, in Schedule 2 thereto, as appropriate.
4. The Interpretation Act 1978 shall apply
as if this Direction were an Act of Parliament.
5. For the purpose of interpreting this
Direction, headings and titles shall be disregarded.
6. This Direction shall take effect on
the day it is published.
7. The Schedule to this Direction shall
form part of this Direction.
DAVID ALBERT EDMONDS
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
XX/XX/XX
Schedule
Andorra
Ascension Island
Montserrat
Turks & Caicos

Annex
C
Wholesale IDD markets which the
Director has determined to be effectively competitive in previous reviews
(46 routes) (known as ‘Category A Routes’)
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
China
Croatia
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Finland
France
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Laos
Luxembourg
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Singapore
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Turkey
Ukraine
USA
Vietnam
Yugoslavia
Annex D
Wholesale IDD markets which the
Director has determined to be prospectively competitive in previous
reviews (193 routes) (known as ‘Category B routes’)
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica Australian Territory
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Ascension Island
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
Christmas Islands
Cocos Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Congo, DR
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Cuba
Cyprus
Cyprus (North)
Czech Republic
Diego Garcia
Djibouti
Dominica
East Timor
Ecuador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faeroe Islands
Fiji
French Guyana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Gibraltar
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Iceland
Iran
Iraq
Jamaica
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Khabarovsk
Kiribati
Korea (South)Korea, PDR
Kuwait
Latvia
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Macao
Macedonia
Madagascar
Madeira
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Micronesia
Midway Islands
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nakhodka
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Marianas
Oman
Palau
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Rodriguez Islands
Romania
Ross Island
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts & Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre & Miquelon
Saint Vincent & the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Tatarstan
Thuraya
Togo
TokelauTonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Turks & Caicos
Tuvalu
Uganda
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Virgin Islands (UK)
Virgin Islands (US)
Wake Island
Wallis & Futuna
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Annex
E
Wholesale IDD routes for which
the Director has determined that C&W has market influence (37 routes)
Andorra
Ascension
Bahrain
Barbados
Belarus
Botswana
Brunei
Bulgaria
Cayman
Colombia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Dominica
Egypt
Grenada
Hungary
Indonesia
Jamaica
Kuwait
Latvia
Macao
Oman
Russia
St Helena
St Kitts
St Lucia
St Vincent
Seychelles
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Trinidad & Tobago
Turks & Caicos
UAE
Ukraine
Virgin Islands
Yemen
Annex
F
Composite list of the Director’s
proposals in relation to wholesale international services markets (242
routes)
|
Competitive routes
|
Markets for which the Director
proposes that BT has SMP
|
Markets for which the Director
proposes that C&W has SMP
|
|
117
|
121
|
4
|
|
Antigua and Barbuda
|
Afghanistan
|
Andorra
|
|
Argentina
|
Albania
|
Ascension Island
|
|
Australia
|
Algeria
|
Montserrat
|
|
Austria
|
American Samoa
|
Turks & Caicos
|
|
Azerbaijan
|
Angola
|
|
|
Bahamas
|
Anguilla
|
|
|
Bahrain
|
Antarctica Australian Territory
|
|
|
Bangladesh
|
Armenia
|
|
|
Barbados
|
Aruba
|
|
|
Belarus
|
Benin
|
|
|
Belgium
|
Bhutan
|
|
|
Belize
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
Burkina Faso
|
|
|
Bolivia
|
Burundi
|
|
|
Botswana
|
Cambodia
|
|
|
Brazil
|
Cameroon
|
|
|
Brunei Darussalam
|
Cape Verde
|
|
|
Bulgaria
|
Central African Republic
|
|
|
Canada
|
Chad
|
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
Comoros
|
|
|
Chile
|
Congo
|
|
|
China
|
Congo, DR
|
|
|
Colombia
|
Cook Islands
|
|
|
Costa Rica
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
|
|
Croatia
|
Cuba
|
|
|
Cyprus
|
Diego Garcia
|
|
|
Czech Republic
|
Djibouti
|
|
|
Denmark
|
East Timor
|
|
|
Dominica
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
|
|
Dominican Republic
|
Eritrea
|
|
|
Ecuador
|
Ethiopia
|
|
|
Egypt
|
Faroe Islands
|
|
|
El Salvador
|
Fiji
|
|
|
Estonia
|
French Guiana
|
|
|
Falkland Islands
|
French Polynesia
|
|
|
Finland
|
Gabon
|
|
|
France
|
Georgia
|
|
|
Gambia
|
Gibraltar
|
|
|
Germany
|
Greenland
|
|
|
Ghana
|
Guadeloupe
|
|
|
Greece
|
Guam
|
|
|
Grenada
|
Guinea
|
|
|
Guatemala
|
Guinea Bissau
|
|
|
Guyana
|
Haiti
|
|
|
Hong Kong
|
Honduras
|
|
|
Hungary
|
Iraq
|
|
|
Iceland
|
Khabarovsk
|
|
|
India
|
Kiribati
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
Korea, PDR
|
|
|
Iran
|
Kirgizstan
|
|
|
Ireland
|
Lebanon
|
|
|
Israel
|
Lesotho
|
|
|
Italy
|
Liberia
|
|
|
Jamaica
|
Libya
|
|
|
Japan
|
Liechtenstein
|
|
|
Jordan
|
Lithuania
|
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
Macedonia
|
|
|
Kenya
|
Madagascar
|
|
|
Korea (South)
|
Malawi
|
|
|
Kuwait
|
Mali
|
|
|
Laos
|
Marshall Islands
|
|
|
Latvia
|
Martinique
|
|
|
Luxembourg
|
Mauritania
|
|
|
Macau
|
Mauritius
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
Mayotte
|
|
|
Maldives
|
Micronesia
|
|
|
Malta
|
Midway Islands
|
|
|
Mexico
|
Moldova
|
|
|
Monaco
|
Mozambique
|
|
|
Mongolia
|
Myanmar
|
|
|
Morocco
|
Nakhodka
|
|
|
Nepal
|
Namibia
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
Nauru
|
|
|
Netherlands Antilles
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
New Zealand
|
Niger
|
|
|
Nicaragua
|
Niue
|
|
|
Nigeria
|
Norfolk Island
|
|
|
Norway
|
Northern Marianas
|
|
|
Oman
|
Palau
|
|
|
Pakistan
|
Papua New Guinea
|
|
|
Panama
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
Paraguay
|
Reunion
|
|
|
Peru
|
Rodriguez Islands
|
|
|
Philippines
|
Romania
|
|
|
Poland
|
Ross Island
|
|
|
Portugal
|
Rwanda
|
|
|
Qatar
|
Saint Kitts & Nevis
|
|
|
Russian Federation
|
Saint Pierre & Miquelon
|
|
|
Saint Helena
|
Sakhalin
|
|
|
Saint Lucia
|
Samoa
|
|
|
Saint Vincent & the Grenadines
|
San Marino
|
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Sao Tome and Principe
|
|
|
Singapore
|
Senegal
|
|
|
Slovak Republic
|
Seychelles
|
|
|
Slovenia
|
Sierra Leone
|
|
|
South Africa
|
Solomon Islands
|
|
|
Spain
|
Somalia
|
|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sudan
|
|
|
Sweden
|
Suriname
|
|
|
Switzerland
|
Swaziland
|
|
|
Syria
|
Tajikistan
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
Tatarstan
|
|
|
Tanzania
|
Togo
|
|
|
Thailand
|
Tokelau
|
|
|
Tunisia
|
Tonga
|
|
|
Turkey
|
Trinidad & Tobago
|
|
|
Ukraine
|
Tristan Da Cunha
|
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
Turkmenistan
|
|
|
Uruguay
|
Tuvalu
|
|
|
USA
|
Uganda
|
|
|
Venezuela
|
Uzbekistan
|
|
|
Vietnam
|
Vanuatu
|
|
|
Virgin Islands (UK)
|
Vatican City
|
|
|
Yemen
|
Virgin Islands (US)
|
|
|
Yugoslavia
|
Wake Island
|
|
|
Zambia
|
Wallis & Futuna
|
|
|
Zimbabwe
|
Ellipso
|
|
|
Emsat
|
|
|
Inmarsat
|
|
|
Iridium
|
|
|
Thuraya
|
|
Annex
G
Questions
| Q1.
Do you agree with Oftel's reasons for reviewing the wholesale international
services markets? |
|
Q2: Do stakeholders think it appropriate
to consider the market on a route by route basis with hubbing
considered as part of the market assessment, or do they consider
it more appropriate to consider a broader geographical market
on the basis that any direct route can be replicated with a combination
of indirect routes?
Q3: Is the Director’s conclusion
in paragraph 2.70 about the availability of reliable information
on hubbing correct?
|
|
Q4: Do stakeholders agree with the
criteria Oftel has proposed for assessing SMP?
Q5: Do stakeholders consider that there
are any criteria that should be added to or removed from the list
and if so why? |
| Q6.
Do stakeholders agree with the Director’s approach to assessing
SMP across wholesale international services markets? If not, what
should the approach be, and why? |
| Q7.
Do stakeholders agree with the Director’s conclusions about competitive
status of each international market (set out in detail below)? If
not, which markets are incorrect, what should the conclusion be
and why? What evidence do you have to support this? |
| Q8.
Do stakeholders have any comments on the range of options that the
Director is proposing for consideration? |
|
Q9. The Director has set out five
different options for regulation in this Chapter. Do stakeholders
consider that there are additional options that the Director should
consider?
Q10. Do stakeholders agree with the
Director’s assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of each
option for regulation? If not, what other advantages and disadvantages
are there?
Q11. Does an obligation on a dominant
provider to observe a 28-day charge change notification period
allow non-dominant providers to adopt a ‘charge following’ strategy
in the relevant wholesale international services markets? If so,
what do stakeholders consider is the effect of charge following
in these markets?
Q12. Do stakeholders agree that the
most appropriate option for regulation where the Director has found
a provider to have SMP in a wholesale international services market
is Option 3 i.e. access, non-discrimination and reference offer
obligations? If not, what remedy or remedies should the Director
be considering? |
Annex
H
Glossary
This glossary contains definitions of terms
used in this consultation document. These definitions are for guidance
only and have no legal standing. For precise definitions please refer
to the relevant licence or legislation.
Accounting rate: the rates at which
international operators account to each other for the calls they originate
and terminate. The rates are divided into shares (which are frequently
the same) for the originating and terminating operator.
Backhaul: is a high capacity inland
circuit. It represents the connection between a cable landing station
and an operator’s existing domestic infrastructure (usually the operator’s
international switching centre).
Barriers to entry: an additional
cost which must be borne by entrants but not by firms already in the
industry; or other factors, which enable an incumbent to maintain prices
above the competitive level without inducing entry.
BT: British Telecommunications
plc.
Cable capacity: the capacity an
international cable has for carrying calls. Cable capacity can be expressed
in terms of design capacity (the amount of capacity a cable is technically
designed to carry) and notional capacity (the amount of capacity that
has been subscribed for by cable consortia members).
Cable consortium: a consortium
of facilities operators, usually including operators from countries
at both ends of a cable, who own and operate international cables.
Cable station/cable landing station:
the point at which international submarine cables arrive and terminate.
The point where the submarine cable is connected to the backhaul circuit.
Communications provider: a person
who provides an Electronic Communications Network or provides an Electronic
Communications Service.
Correspondent agreements: an agreement
with a far end operator, for that operator to receive and terminate
international calls originating on the near end operator's facilities.
Digital International Switching Centre
(DISC): the last inland exchange for outgoing international calls
and first inland exchange for incoming international calls. Calls are
switched at the DISC for onward conveyance internationally or nationally.
Digital Local Exchange (DLE) and Local
exchange: the telephone exchange to which customers are directly
connected, often via a remote concentrator unit.
DMSU (Digital Main Switching Unit):
a tandem exchange primarily used for connecting calls between DLEs.
Exchange line: the telephone line
that connects the customers’ network terminating point to the local
exchange.
Fully Allocated Costs (FAC): an
accounting method for attributing all the costs of the company to defined
activities such as products and services. Typically this method would
follow the principle of cost causality.
Hubbing: is the routing of international
traffic via an intermediate third country.
Hull Area: the area defined as the
'Licensed Area' in the licence granted on 30 November 1987 by the Secretary
of State under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 to Kingston
upon Hull City Council and Kingston Communications (Hull) plc.
Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU):
an IRU gives the IRU owner the right to use capacity for the life
of a cable and liability to pay maintenance charges. IRU owners do not
have voting rights in cable consortium.
Indirect access (IA): where a customer
establishes a connection with a particular operator’s network by dialling
a short code to switch through the network on which his exchange line
terminates. Such calls are usually billed by the Indirect Access operator.
Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN): a network evolved from the digital PSTN which provides digital
exchange lines to customers and 64kbps end to end digital connectivity
between them. Two or more 64kbps connections can be combined to provide
a higher speed connection, e.g. 128kbps.
Interconnection Directive (ICD): is
Directive 97/33/EC of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in telecommunications
with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through
application of the principles of Open Network Provision (ONP).
Interconnection: the linking (whether
directly or indirectly by physical or logical means, or by a combination
of physical or logical means) of one Public Electronic Communications
Network to another for the purpose of enabling the persons using one
of them to be able: (a) to communicate with users of the other one;
or (b) to make use of services provided by means of the other one (whether
by the provider of that Network or by another person);
International Direct Dial (IDD): are
calls made by end-users dialling direct to subscribers in other countries
via the PSTN or ISDN.
International facilities: is
infrastructure owned and operated by a licensed operator for conveying
traffic between countries. In the United Kingdom the international facilities
licensees are licensed to own and operate international facilities at
the UK end on all international routes.
International Facilities Licence (IFL):
is a licence granted under the Telecommunications Act 1984
authorising the connection of a UK telecommunications system to a telecommunication
system outside the UK and the provision of telecommunication services
over the system to countries outside the UK.
International Private Leased Circuits
(IPLCs): International circuits leased from facilities operators
in order to provide international services which cross one or more international
boundary.
International simple voice resale (ISVR):
is an international service provided by an operator to consumers
using the international facilities owned by other operators. In the
case of an outgoing call, the operator collects traffic from the public
telecommunications network, transfers it to a line leased from a facilities
operator, and then hands it over to a PTO in an overseas country who
will deliver the call to its destination. It therefore involves ‘breakout’
onto the public telecommunications network at both ends, but with the
international leg of the call being carried on leased circuits. ISVR
traffic bypasses the accounting rate system.
Internet Service Provider (ISP):
a company that provides individuals and other companies access to the
Internet and other related services.
IP (Internet Protocol): the packet
data protocol used for routing and carriage of messages across the Internet
and similar networks.
IP network: a network that uses
IP; for example the Internet is a public IP network.
ISVR licence: a UK licence authorising
an operator to receive incoming and offer outgoing calls conveyed via
ISVR.
Kingston: Kingston Communications
(Hull) PLC – telephone company which operates in the Hull area.
Leased lines (also known as private
circuits): a permanently connected communications link between two
premises dedicated to the customers’ exclusive use.
Local loop: the access network
connection between the customer’s premises and the local PSTN exchange,
usually a loop comprised of two copper wires.
Long Run Incremental Costs (LRIC):
The costs caused by the provision of a defined increment of output,
taking a long run perspective, assuming that some output is already
produced. The ‘long run’ means the time horizon over which all costs
(including capital investment) are variable.
Market influence (MI): means the
ability to raise prices above the competitive level for a non-transitory
period without losing sales to such a degree to make this unprofitable.
Modem: a device which converts
digital signals into a voiceband form capable of being conveyed over
an analogue connection, such as the public telephone network, and vice-versa.
Network Charge Control (NCC): is
the interconnection charging regime set out in condition 13 of BT’s
licence and condition 66 of CNS’ licence. CNS is free to set charge
for competitive and new interconnection services. Charges for interconnection
services that are not yet competitive are subject to charge controls.
NRAs: the body or bodies, legally
distinct and functionally independent of the telecommunications organisations,
charged by a Member State with the elaboration of, and supervision of
compliance with, telecommunications authorisations.
Originating operator: the operator
on whose network the call originates
PPCs (Partial Private Circuits):
a generic term used to describe a category of private circuits that
terminate at a point of connection between two operators’ networks.
It is therefore the provision of transparent transmission capacity between
a customer’s premises and a point of connection between the two operators’
networks. It may also be termed a part leased line. It includes terminating
segments.
PSTN: Public Switched Telephone
Network
Public Telecommunications Operator
(PTO): is a network operators providing services to the public
with powers granted by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry,
under the Telecommunications Act 1984, to enable them to install their
systems on public and private land, property etc.
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE): the
ratio of accounting profit to capital employed. The measure of capital
employed can be either Historic Cost Accounting (HCA) or Current Cost
Accounting (CCA).
Route: means a unique "country-pair"
for which international traffic is carried where the UK is one country
and the destination country is another, e.g. UK to USA, UK to Jamaica
or UK to Uganda. For the purposes of this definition a "destination
country" may include cities or territories which are not as such
countries or which are satellite services, but which have their own
wholesale international services markets (such as: Khabarovsk in the
Russian Federation, Hong Kong in the People’s Republic of China and
Inmarsat respectively). |