|
Statutory
Consultation on Proposed Modifications to BT’s Licence to give effect
to Charge Controls for Single |
|||||||
|
Statutory Consultation on Proposed Modification to BT’s Licence Annex A – Proposed Modification to Condition 69 of BT’s Licence Annex B – Notice under Section 12(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1984 E1 Flat rate Internet access call origination (FRIACO) is an unmetered call origination interconnection service, i.e. operators pay a set charge to utilise BT’s network and are not charged on a per minute basis. The FRIACO interconnection service makes it viable for BT Retail and its competitors to offer unmetered Internet services over BT’s network to end customers. E2 Oftel required BT to offer a flat rate interconnection service at the local exchange (DLE) in its Direction of 26 May 2000. BT was required to introduce the FRIACO service to enhance competition in the provision of dial-up Internet access. BT was specifically required to introduce FRIACO because Oftel found that BT was dominant in call origination, the interconnection service that provides the link between the end-user’s premises and the DLE. As this interconnection service is non-competitive, Oftel proposed to subject the charges for it to RPI-X controls. RPI-X controls ensure that BT has the incentive to reduce its costs in relation to the provision of non-competitive services, whilst giving competitors’ certainty over future movements in charges. Oftel proposed that FRIACO at the DLE (DLE FRIACO) should be subject to a charge control set at RPI-7.5%. It proposed to apply these controls from 1 October 2001 and that they should be applied at the component level. E3 However, Oftel believed that DLE FRIACO did not on its own meet operators’ requirements. BT’s competitors can choose to build out to the DLE level and are likely to do so if they believe that this makes economic sense. It is, though, unrealistic to expect all operators to interconnect with BT at the DLE level and BT remains dominant in the provision of conveyance between its local and tandem exchanges. DLE FRIACO would not therefore fully meet the needs of operators who wished to purchase unmetered interconnection from BT. Accordingly, Oftel has required BT to provide a flat rate service at the tandem (DMSU) layer of its network, which is where the majority of its competitors connect to its network. E4 In November 2000, Oftel published a draft Direction under which it proposed that BT should be required to provide an unmetered interconnection service between its DLEs and DMSUs (ST FRIACO). This interconnection service in combination with DLE FRIACO allows operators connected at the tandem layer to offer unmetered Internet retail services to customers who are connected to BT’s network. E5 In Determination relating to a dispute between British Telecommunications and Worldcom concerning the provision of a Flat Rate Internet Access Call Origination product ("FRIACO"), February 2001, Oftel set charges for ST FRIACO to apply up to 30 September 2001 and proposed a different set of charges to apply from 1 October 2001. Oftel proposed that with effect from 1 October 2001 the charges for ST FRIACO should be subject to a charge control using the RPI-X formula. Oftel believed that the value of ‘X’ for ST FRIACO should be set at 11.75%.
E6 This proposal involved a rise in the charge for ST FRIACO on 1 October 2001 of just over 2%. However, this proposed rise reflected much larger percentage increases in the charges for the local-tandem circuit and FRIACO port at the tandem switch of almost 12% and 19% respectively. The difference in the proposed charges partly reflected different methodologies used in the calculation of the charges pre- and post-October. The pre-October charges were calculated by projecting forward cost data from 1997/1998 and projections of minutes per circuit based on 1994/1995 data, whilst the post-October charges were based on 1999/2000 cost and volume data supplied by BT. The main reason for the difference, however, was the allowance of a relatively high rate of return in the post-October charges in order to make the charges for ST FRIACO consistent with those for metered local-tandem conveyance and so avoid distorting the choice between metered and unmetered access. E8 Oftel has calculated charges for the local-tandem circuit and tandem port to apply from 1 October 2001 by inflating the pre-October charges by RPI-5% per annum for six months. This allows for efficiency gains and inflation up to 1 October 2001, which is consistent with the derivation of the pre-October charges described in paragraph E6. This change in the charges results in proposed charges to apply from 1 October 2001 as follows:
E9 Oftel’s approach to charge controls is to set them so that BT earns its cost of capital in the last year of the cap. Oftel is proposing a roll-forward of existing charges, which leads to a lower starting charge in the new period than was proposed in the February document. This means that, in order to allow BT to earn its cost of capital in the final year of the controls, the value of ‘X’ must be reduced compared with the earlier proposal. This results in a value of ‘X’ to be applied to each of the component charges for ST FRIACO of 8.75. These controls are to apply for four years from 1 October 2001 and should initially apply to those charges set out above. E10 At Annex A, Oftel has set out proposed modifications to BT’s licence to give effect to charge controls for ST FRIACO. These are for statutory consultation, and Oftel invites comments on these proposed modifications. E11 Oftel is also taking this opportunity to modify Condition 69 so that the total charge for DLE FRIACO is derived from the following formula: [Local exchange call origination circuit x the adjustment ratio] + FRIACO port at the DLE + PPP per FRIACO port. E12 Oftel proposes to replace the starting charge for DLE FRIACO at Condition 69.2(d)(iv) with the above formula. BT’s licence already sets out the starting charges for each component of DLE FRIACO. The charge for the DLE FRIACO service can therefore be calculated with reference to the above formula without setting the charge in Condition 69(d)(iv). Oftel does not consider that it is appropriate to establish the final charge for FRIACO services given that the charge for this service will be subject to change following movements in the component charges and the adjustment ratio. Oftel has set out the proposed modifications to give effect to ST FRIACO charge controls on the same basis. Statutory Consultation on Proposed Modifications to BT’s LicenceOftel seeks the views of consumers and industry on the proposed Section 12 modifications to BT’s licence set out Annex A to this document by 17 September 2001.Comments on the proposed modifications should be sent in writing to: Mike Galvin Tel: 020 7634 8869 E-mail: mike.galvin@oftel.gov.uk Written comments will be made publicly available on the web site and in Oftel’s Research and Intelligence Unit except where respondents indicate that the response, or parts of it, is confidential. Annex A The proposed modifications to BT’s licence1. In Part J of Schedule 1 to the Licence, sub-paragraph (d) of Condition 69.2 shall be substituted by the following new sub-paragraph (d): ‘(d) the same amount is applied to a Network Component or Network Part, as the case may be, whenever it is used for any Standard Service within, respectively any of the following categories: Category A: Call Origination Conveyance Standard Services; Category B: Call Termination Conveyance Standard Services; Category C: data management amendments to allow the routing of emergency calls to Land Mobile Radio Service Operators; interconnection extension circuits, in-span interconnection, and customer sited interconnection (for connection, rental and rearrangement); product management, policy and planning (PPP), except PPP as referred to in paragraph (iii) of Category D below; Category D: flat rate internet access call origination (FRIACO) Conveyance Standard Services at the digital local exchange; the starting charges, to be effective from 1 October 2001, for this Category of services shall be: (i) for a local exchange call origination circuit (excluding the flat rate internet access call origination port at the digital local exchange), £128.16 (this charge, as amended from time to time, is referred to as "D(i)" in the formula set out in sub-paragraph (iv) below and in sub-paragraph (iii) of Category F below); (ii) for a flat rate internet access call origination port at the digital local exchange, £39.69 (this charge, as amended from time to time, is referred to as "D(ii)" in the formula set out in sub-paragraph (iv) below and in sub-paragraph (iii) of Category F below); (iii) for
product management, policy and planning (PPP) per flat rate
internet access call origination port, £37.03 (this charge,
as amended from time to time, is referred to as "D(iii)"
in the formula set out in sub-paragraph (iv) below and in
sub-paragraph (iii) of Category F below); (iv) [D(i) x AR (LECO)] + D(ii) + D(iii) "AR (LECO)" means the adjustment ratio (local exchange call origination (LECO)) which measures the number of LECO circuits that are needed for each FRIACO port. The AR (LECO) may be reviewed by the Director and amended by him after consultation with Interested Parties from time to time. Category
E: single transit Conveyance Standard Services and Local-tandem
Conveyance Standard Services Category F: flat rate internet access call origination (FRIACO) Conveyance Standard Services at the tandem exchange; the starting charges, to be effective from 1 October 2001, for this Category of services shall be: (i) for a local-tandem circuit (excluding FRIACO port at the tandem exchange), £101.49 (this charge, as amended from time to time, is referred to as "F(i)" in the formula set out in sub-paragraph (iii) below); (ii) for a FRIACO port at the tandem switch, £35.66 (this charge, as amended from time to time, is referred to as "F(ii)" in the formula set out in sub-paragraph (iii) below); and. (iii) the total charge for flat rate internet access call origination at the tandem exchange is determined according to the following formula: [D(i) x AR (LECO)] + [(D(ii) + F(i)) x AR (LT)] + D(iii) + F (ii) "AR (LT)" means the adjustment ratio (local-tandem (LT)) which measures the number LT circuits that are needed for each FRIACO port. AR (LT) may be reviewed by the Director and amended by him after consultation with Interested Parties from time to time. 2. In Part J of Schedule 1 to the Licence, Condition 69.6 shall be substituted by the following: ‘69.6 The Licensee shall take all reasonable steps to secure that, during any Relevant Year (a) the aggregate of Charges for Call Origination Conveyance Standard Services; (b) the aggregate of Charges for Call Termination Conveyance Standard Services; (c) the aggregate of Charges for:
(e) the
aggregate of Charges for single transit Conveyance Standard Services
and Local-tandem Conveyance Standard Services
in each case remains such that: 3. In Part J of Schedule 1 to the Licence, Condition 69.11 shall be substituted by the following: ‘69.11
Where, notwithstanding
the obligation imposed on the Licensee by paragraph 69.6, there has
taken place a change in Charges of a kind not permitted under paragraph
4.In Part J of Schedule 1 to the Licence, Condition 69.13 shall be substituted by the following: ‘69.13 Subject to paragraphs 69.14, 69.18 and 69.19, the Controlling Percentage in relation to any Relevant Year is the amount of the change in the Retail Prices Index in the period of 12 months ending on 30th June immediately before the beginning of that Year, expressed as a percentage (rounded to two decimal places) of that Index as at the beginning of that period ("RPI"), reduced:
(b) for Category B services, by 10; (c) for Category C services, by 8.25; (d) for
Category D services, by 7.5;
(f) for Category F services, by 8.75. For the avoidance of doubt, these respective Categories of services shall have the same meaning as those set out in Condition 69.2.’
4. In Part J of Schedule 1 to the Licence, Condition 69.18 shall be substituted by the following: ‘69.18
If the Licensee
imposes a specific charge or an increased charge in relation to any
goods or service which up to the time when the charge or increased charge
is first imposed had been provided without charge or at a lower charge
and the Director determines that some or all of the costs properly attributable
to that service had previously been attributed to services to which
paragraph 69.6 applies and that it would be proper in the circumstances
for the newly introduced or increased charge to be controlled, that
charge shall, unless the Director determines otherwise, be a Charge
within the same relevant paragraph 69.6(a), 69.6(b), 69.6(c), 69.6(d),
(a) the Licensee shall produce a forecast of the revenue expected to accrue as a result of the Charge or increased Charge for the goods or service over the period of twelve months from the date of introduction or increase of the Charge; (b) the forecast shall be expressed as a percentage of the total amount of revenue reasonably believed by the Licensee to have accrued in respect of the relevant aggregate Charges during the Relevant Financial Year which relates to the Relevant Financial Year during which the Charge is introduced or increased; (c) the Controlling Percentage for that Relevant Year shall be reduced by that percentage; (d) an adjustment shall be made to the Controlling Percentage for that Relevant Year in respect of which it is first possible, from the Relevant Financial Year accounts, to take into account a comparison between the first twelve months’ actual accrued revenue from the Charge and the forecast referred to in sub-paragraph (a), whereby the Controlling Percentage for that Relevant Year shall be increased or reduced (as the case may be) by the difference between the forecast amount referred to in sub-paragraph (a) and the amount of actual accrued revenue (the difference to be expressed as a percentage of the total amount of revenue accrued in respect of the relevant aggregate Charges during the Relevant Financial Year which relates to that Relevant Year); (e) further adjustments shall be made to the Controlling Percentage referred to in sub-paragraph (d): (i) where there is any difference between the forecast referred to in sub-paragraph (a) and the actual accrued revenue referred to in sub-paragraph (d), in order to compensate for the extent to which, by virtue of that difference, Charges in previous Relevant Years have been too high or too low (as the case may be), and (ii) where there has been any variation in the Charge for the goods or service between the Relevant Year referred to in sub-paragraph (b) and the Relevant Year referred to in sub-paragraph (d) which the Director, after consultation with the Licensee, determines should be taken into account for the purposes of calculating the Controlling Percentage; and (f) the adjustments referred to in sub-paragraphs (d) and (e) shall be made in the manner which the Director determines to be appropriate in the circumstances.’ |
|||||||