Consultation
issued by the Director General of Telecommunications
Contents
Chapter
1 Summary
Chapter 2 Introduction
Chapter 3 Analysis
Chapter 4 Conclusion
Chapter 5 Consultation
Annex A Condition 20B.15 (now Condition 78)
of BT’s Licence
Annex B Condition 78 of BT's Licence
Annex C Draft Notice Revoking the MNS Direction
Chapter 1
Summary
1.1 On 7 February
1996 the Director General of Telecommunications (the "Director
General") issued a Direction under Condition 20B.15 (now Condition
78.12) of BT’s Licence (the "Direction"). The Direction required
BT to provide accounting information on its Managed Network Services
to the Director General on a 6-monthly basis. The Director General has
been asked by BT to revoke the Direction.12. This document sets out
the background to the issue and the reasons for the Director General's
provisional view that it is appropriate to revoke the Direction.
1.2 The Direction
was made following a complaint-initiated investigation into the allegations
that BT was cross-subsidising its Managed Network Services ("BTMNS")
division. The main provisions of the Direction require that as regards
to five BTMNS product offerings - Transborder, High Speed National,
Cardway, Frame Relay International and Low Speed Custom Networks - BT
ensures that:
- each product/long
term contract is not unfairly subsidised or cross-subsidised; and
- it supplies to
the Director General independently audited accounting data on a six-monthly
basis to support this.
1.3 BT has provided
accounting information including financial reports in accordance with
the Direction which was put in place to ensure BT has not acted, and
is not likely to act, in breach Condition 20B.15 (now 78.12) of its
licence as regards to the unfair cross-subsidy or unfair subsidy of
its MNS services. Further, the Director General is advised that some
of the MNS products cited in the Direction now face lower demand and
have ceased or will cease to exist in their original form as discrete
networking services, instead forming part of a wider customer offering.
1.4 BT believes
that it has been fully compliant with the reporting requirements of
the Direction and in ensuring that no cross-subsidy has occurred. Consequently,
BT has requested that the Director General revoke the Direction.
1.5 Having considered
the issues, the Director General's preliminary view is that no clear
evidence of a breach of the terms of the Direction as regards the requirement
that there is no unfair subsidies or unfair cross-subsidies has been
shown. The Director General's preliminary view is also that there is
no clear evidence to show future breaches of the relevant licence condition
in a manner similar to the breaches that resulted in the issuing of
the Direction.
1.6 Further, the
Competition Act 1998 provides the Director General with increased powers
of investigation and enables him to impose financial penalties of up
to 10% of a company’s UK turnover for each year that an infringement
has lasted, up to a maximum of three years. This should provide a disincentive
to any companies who might intend to engage in anti-competitive behaviour.
But, if such abusive behaviour occurs, the Competition Act 1998 provides
the powers to investigate and take appropriate action.
1.7 Accordingly,
and pursuant to Paragraph 7 of BT’s Licence, the Director General proposes
to revoke the Direction. A copy of the draft revocation notice can be
found at Annex C.
1.8 This consultation
seeks the views of interested parties as to whether the Direction continues
to be necessary. The closing date for comments on this proposal is 30
September 2002. Full details of the consultation process are set out
in Chapter 5.

Chapter 2
Introduction
2.1 This chapter
sets out the background to the BTMNS Direction, providing brief descriptions
of the products concerned and the legal basis for the Director General’s
intervention.
BTMNS
2.2 The Direction
was focused on five specific product lines offered by BTMNS that constituted
separate "parts" of its business for the purposes of Condition 20B.15
(now Condition 78.12):
- Transborder (an
international X25 service, since known as Concert Packet Services);
- High Speed National;
- Cardway (a separate
low speed credit card verification network, inter-linked with X25);
- Frame Relay International
(Now known as Concert Frame Relay); and
- Low speed networks,
including High Street Networks and Mid Size Networks (these are discount
packages offering customers volume and duration discounts, using the
X25 network).
The Direction extended
to cover any product line which replaces any, or any combination of
the above product lines.
The
complaint
2.3 In 1992 four
complainants alleged anti-competitive practice by MNS, centering on
unfair subsidy of MNS's activities from its systems business and predatory
pricing in the provision of value-added data services. In December 1994
the Director General expressed his concern that a lengthy investigation
had proved inconclusive because of limitations in the information available
to him. He stated his intention to verify the adequacy of accounting
improvements BT was making in 1994/5 and 1995/6, and to return to the
original allegations.
2.4 Following his
review of the BT's accounting improvements, the Director General announced
in February 1996 that he was satisfied that no further action was required
in six of the eight areas examined. However, in two important areas
he did not find it possible to reach favourable conclusions: adequacy
of internal accounting controls within BT's core business over charges
to other parts of BT (such as MNS), and whether customers were charged
all relevant costs for services offered by MNS.
Regulatory
position
2.5 After detailed
investigations, including the use of powers under Condition 20B.15 (Separate
Accounts) of BT's Licence and independent accountancy advisors Messrs
Pannell Kerr Forster, the Director General concluded that certain product
lines offered by MNS constituted 'parts' of its business for the purposes
of Condition 20B.15 (now Condition 78.12) of BT's licence: Transborder,
High-Speed National, Cardway, Frame Relay International, and Low-Speed
Networks (including High Street Networks and Mid-Sized Networks).
2.6 Additionally,
certain parts of the BTMNS business were characterised by the award
of relatively long-term contracts with high start-up costs, recovered
after the life of each contract. Therefore, the most appropriate measure
of profitability was considered to be the internal rate of return ("IRR").
2.7 The Director
General concluded that:
- at least some
of the BTMNS product offerings were being either subsidised or cross-subsidised;
- such subsidy
or cross-subsidy was unfair in that it deprived third parties of opportunities
to gain contracts; and
- any such subsidy
or cross-subsidy could have a material effect on competition in the
United Kingdom.
2.8 On 7 February
1996 the Director General accordingly directed BT, under Condition 20B.15,
to:
- make an appropriate
return on each of the activities listed in the Direction (ie the product
lines listed above, plus product lines which replace any, or any combination
of, those product lines);
- provide him with
a business plan showing how this is to be achieved;
- keep records
and provide on-going information on the financial performance of the
activities; and
- show that charges
between MNS and other parts of BT's businesses are properly based
and charged, in particular by providing an external audit report.
BT
request for revocation of the Direction
2.9 BT has now applied
to the Director General to have the Direction revoked. BT states that
it has been fully compliant in meeting the requirements of the Direction
in the supply of reports and other documentation to the Director General
and that it has been fully compliant with the Direction in ensuring
that there has been no cross-subsidy.
2.10 BT further
observes that in the five years of providing returns for the contracts
and products that fall within the scope of the Direction, there have
been no issues raised by the Director General, nor have there been any
qualifications to the independent audit reports.
Legal
framework
2.11 At the time
of making the Direction, Condition 20B.15 of BT's licence stated that
where the Director General is satisfied that the Licensee,
"a) has within
the previous six years…unfairly subsidised or unfairly cross subsidised
and has ceased to unfairly subsidise or unfairly cross subsidise
but is likely to repeat that unfair subsidy at any time in the future;
or
b) is unfairly
subsidising or unfairly cross subsidising;
either:
i) any or all
of the Business other than the Residual Business; or
ii) any part
or parts of the Business other than the Residual Business where
the Director is satisfied that unfair subsidy or unfair cross subsidy,
as the case may be, has or could have a material effect on competition
in the United Kingdom in relation to the activity to which the unfair
subsidy or unfair cross subsidy relates;
or both, it
shall take such steps as the Director may direct for the purpose
of remedying the situation"
2.12 Condition 78
(Separate Accounts) of BT's licence has since superseded Condition 20B.15.
Note that the requirements of all licence conditions and licence enforcement
actions in their current form will be lifted from 25th July
2003, as all current telecommunications licences will cease to exist
in line with the requirements of European Commission Directives (published
on 24th April 2002).
2.13 Condition 78.12
provides that where the Director is satisfied that the licensee,
"a) has within
the previous six years …unfairly subsidised or unfairly cross-subsidised
and has ceased to unfairly subsidise or unfairly cross subsidise
but is likely to repeat that unfair subsidy or unfairly cross subsidy
at any time in the future; or
b) is unfairly subsidising
or unfairly cross-subsidising;
either:
i) any or all
of the Businesses other than the Residual Business; or
ii) any
part or parts of any of the Business other than the Residual
Business where the Director is satisfied that unfair subsidy
or unfair cross subsidy, as the case may be, has or could have
a material effect on competition…
it shall take
such steps as the Director may direct for the purposes if remedying
the situation".
2.14 In assessing
whether or not the Direction should be revoked, the Director General
has considered the following issues:
a) Whether the
conditions of the Direction have been met; and
b) Whether there
is likely to be a breach of the Direction or of the relevant licence
condition (Condition 78.12) in the future.
This assessment
is discussed in Chapter 3.

Chapter
3
Analysis
3.1 This chapter
discusses whether or not BT has met the requirements of the Direction
and the Director General's views on the likelihood of a future breach
of Condition 78.12 by BT as regards those parts of the MNS business
(or the replacement of any, or any combination of those parts) specified
in the Direction.
Compliance
with the terms of the Direction
3.2 At the time
of the Direction, Condition 20B.15 of BT's licence referred to "any
part or parts" of BT's business. The Direction specified five product
offerings as being such "parts" of the BTMNS business:
i) Transborder;
ii) High Speed
Custom National;
iii) Cardway;
iv) Frame Relay
International; and
v) Low Speed
Custom Networks
3.3 The Direction
requires that for each of these parts and for each long-term contract,
BT shows that an overall positive internal rate of return of at least
15% is made over the anticipated life of that part or contracted period
of each long term contract. In order for BT to demonstrate compliance,
the Direction also requires that BT submits accounting information to
the Director General on a six-monthly basis along with audit reports
on an annual basis.
3.4 BT has provided
financial returns in line with the reporting requirements of the Direction
and the Director General has not demonstrated that BT has acted in breach
of the Direction as regards the requirement that there are no unfair
subsidies or unfair cross-subsidies.
Re-organisation
of BTMNS
3.5 Since the issuing
of the Direction in February 1996, the organisational structure of BTMNS
has moved towards what BT describes as a 'solutions-based' approach
combining network and IT services, normally tailored to the needs of
individual customers, rather than offering distinct services such as
the parts listed in the Direction.
3.6 In 1997, BTMNS
was merged with another part of BT, Syncordia Solutions, to form BT
Syncordia Solutions. This in turn has more recently been re-branded
as BT Ignite Solutions, describing its business as providing "managed
and outsourced total business solutions".
3.7 BT has advised
the Director General of the history of each of the five parts specified
in the Direction since 1996:
i) Transborder:
This service is a 9.6 - 64 Kb/s short data messages service
targeting medium to large corporates. The service is now known as
Concert Packet Services. The assets associated to the service now
belong to CNS and the service is sold out of CNS under the CNS licence.
The service is to cease in 2003 with customers going to other products
from the Concert portfolio.
ii) Frame Relay
International: This is a 64Kb/s - 2Mb/s non real time data service
targeting medium to large corporates. It has been renamed as Concert
Frame Relay and now sold by CNS under the CNS licence.
iii) Low Speed
Custom: This is a data service of up to 128 Kb/s used by 'data network
customers with low throughput requirements' (such as high street
chains). Due to the increasing demands of major businesses and large
corporates for higher bandwidth services, BT asserts that there
is a reducing requirement for low speed services with a migration
to manage network services that can only be described as High Speed
National services.
iv) Cardway:
Cardway is a credit card validation service used by financial institutions,
run over the PSTN. It is different from the other services covered
by the Direction as it is an NTS service that supports dial up credit
card verification. BT argues that due to competition in the provision
of NTS services and customer migration IP supporting card verification
services, volumes of sales are falling.
v) High Speed
National: This is a data service for corporates, originally defined
as providing managed data services at bandwidths between 64Kbits
and 2M/Bts. BT believes that the changes in customers' requirements
illustrates how high speed national services have reduced in importance
in overall Solutions contracts and are in themselves being superseded
by other, higher bandwidth services. BT argues that there has been
a switch from single standard services to dynamic, multiple services
customised to the changing needs of the individual end-user.
3.8 BT believes
that a change in the demands of customers has in turn led to a business
area characterised by fragmentation of supply, high-growth and a wide
variety of competitors, including well-established telecommunications
and IT services companies such as Accenture, IBM, CMG, Logica, Worldcom,
Cable and Wireless, Energis and France Telecom.
The
Director General welcomes any views on the above description of services,
in particular the availability of the parts listed, or their replacements,
as individual products or in combination. Comments are also welcomed
on BT's assertion that the demand has changed over time from the need
for individual services to complex solutions provided by a range of
telecoms and IT services companies.
Compliance
with the licence condition outside of the terms of the Direction.
3.9 The Director
General is not currently aware of any breaches of Condition 78.12 in
any areas related to those parts specified in the Direction.
Likelihood
of future breaches
3.10 The Direction
addresses concerns with the adequacy of internal accounting controls
within BT's core business over charges to other parts of BT, and whether
customers were charged all relevant costs for services offered by MNS.
3.11 As already
discussed, the Direction refers to specific parts, some of which are
now no longer in existence (or will be withdrawn) in their original
form as discrete network services or a combination of such services.
3.12 Upon receipt
of its financial returns, the Director General has shown no clear breach
of the Direction by BT. Additionally, the preparation by BT of a customer
contract also involves the identification of individual components that
are priced according to the BT Price List.
3.13 Taking into
consideration the above arguments, the Director General currently considers
that there is no clear evidence to show that BT will breach its licence
condition 78.12 in a manner similar to the breaches that resulted in
the BTMNS Direction being issued.
3.14 It should be
noted that if the Direction is revoked, Condition 78.12 of BT's licence
still places an overriding obligation on BT to not unfairly subsidise
or cross-subsidise.
3.15 Additionally,
action could be taken by the Director General or affected third parties
under Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998 if BT was considered to
be abusing its dominant position. The Competition Act 1998 provides
the Director General with increased powers of investigation and enables
him to impose financial penalties of up to 10% of a company’s UK turnover
for each year that an infringement has lasted, up to a maximum of three
years. This should provide a disincentive to any companies who might
intend to engage in anti-competitive behaviour. But, if such abusive
behaviour occurs, the Competition Act provides the power to investigate
and take appropriate action.

Chapter
4
Conclusions
4.1 On the basis
of the information available to him at this time, the Director General
is of the preliminary view on the basis of the information available
to him at this time that the breach of BT’s licence which gave rise
to the Direction in this case is not continuing and is not likely to
recur. the Direction is no longer necessary to secure compliance with
the licence obligation.
4.2 The Director
General is therefore minded to revoke the Direction. This does not however
preclude the possibility of a further Direction being issued in future,
if further breaches of licence conditions become likely, nor does it
preclude action under the Competition Act 1998 in appropriate circumstances.

Chapter 5
Consultation
5.1 The Director
General seeks the views of interested parties on the proposals contained
in this consultation document. Please supply your comments by 30th
September 2002. All non-confidential responses will be published. The
Director General will then publish a statement setting out his conclusions
and, if still minded to do so, the Director General will revoke the
Direction.
5.2 Comments should
be made in writing and where possible sent by e-mail
to lawrence.knight@oftel.gov.uk. However, copies may also be posted
or faxed to the address below. If any stakeholders are unable to supply
their comments in one of these ways, please use the contact details
below to discuss alternatives.
Lawrence Knight
Oftel
50 Ludgate Hill
London EC4M 7JJ
Telephone: 020 7634
8747
Fax: 020 7634 8738
5.3 Confidential
responses should not be sent via the Internet. Responses will be published
on Oftel's website in the Publications section under 'Responses to Oftel
consultations' except where respondents indicate that the response,
or part of it, is confidential. Appointments to view written comments
in Oftel's Research and Information Unit must be made in advance (see
contact details below). Respondents are therefore asked to separate
out any confidential material into a clearly marked annex. In the interests
of transparency, respondents are requested to avoid confidential markings
wherever possible.
Internet
5.4 This document
is available on Oftel's website at www.oftel.gov.uk. Hard copies are
also available from Oftel's Research and Information Unit. Oftel has
a free e-mail based mailing list to help people stay informed about
the work that Oftel is doing. Each time an Oftel document is published
and placed on Oftel's website at www.oftel.gov.uk, subscribers to the
list receive an e-mail informing them about the document. To register,
please go to the What's New section of the website and link to the electronic
form.
Alternative
formats
5.5 Copies of this
consultation document are available on disk. Accessible formats such
as large print, Braille and audio cassette can be made available on
request. Please contact the Oftel Research and Information Unit on 020
7634 8761 or by e-mail at
infocent@oftel.gov.uk for more information.
The
consultation criteria
5.6 Oftel considers
that this document meets the Cabinet Office code of practice on written
consultation documents. The code is reproduced below for convenience.
If you have any comments or complaints about this consultation process
please contact:
Oftel Co-ordinator
for the Code of Practice:
Rob Jex,
Oftel,
50 Ludgate Hill,
London EC4M 7JJ,
e-mail:
rob.jex@oftel.gov.uk
tel: 020 7634 5350
fax: 020 7634 8943
Code
of practice
5.7 The code of
practice states that:
- timing of consultation
should be built into the planning process for a policy (including
legislation) or service from the start, so that it has the best prospect
of improving the proposals concerned, and so that sufficient time
is left for it at each stage;
- it should be
clear who is being consulted, about what questions, in what timescale
and for what purpose;
- a consultation
document should be as simple and concise as possible. It should include
a summary, in two main pages at most, of the main questions it seeks
views on. It should make it as easy as possible for readers to respond,
make contact or complain;
- documents should
be made widely available, with the fullest use of electronic means
(though not to the exclusion of others), and effectively drawn to
the attention of all interested groups and individuals;
- sufficient time
should be allowed for considered responses from all groups with an
interest;
- responses should
be carefully and open-mindedly analysed, and the results made widely
available, with an account of the views expressed, and reasons for
decisions finally taken;
- departments should
monitor and evaluate consultations, designating a consultation co-ordinator
that will endure that all lessons are used.
Annex
A
Please click
here to access the statement that accompanied the Direction dated
7 February 1996.
Condition
20B.15 - 20B.20 BT’s Licence
20B.15 Without prejudice
to Condition 18, where the Director is satisfied, on the basis of the
most up to date information which has been made available to him at
the relevant time, that the Licensee:
(a) has within the
previous six years (excluding any period before the date on which this
Condition comes into force) unfairly subsidised or unfairly cross subsidised
and has ceased to unfairly subsidise or unfairly cross subsidise but
is likely to repeat that unfair subsidy or unfair cross subsidy at any
time in the future; or
(b) is unfairly
subsidising or unfairly cross subsidising;
either:
(i) any or
all of the Businesses other than the Residual Business; or
(ii) any part
or parts of any of the Businesses other than the Residual Business
where the Director is satisfied that unfair subsidy or unfair
cross subsidy, as the case may be, has or could have a material
effect on competition in the United Kingdom in relation to the
activity to which the unfair subsidy or unfair cross subsidy relates;
or both, it shall
take such steps as the Director may direct for the purpose of remedying
the situation.
20B.16 The Licensee
shall, with the consent of the Director, make such amendments as are
from time to time required to:
(a) the definition
of each Business in terms of the revenues, costs and assets comprised
in it;
(b) the number of
Businesses for the purposes of this Condition;
(c) the manner in
which each Business may be disaggregated
(d) the form and
content of:
(i) the profit and
loss account;
(ii) the statement
of mean capital employed;
(iii) the statements
of costs (if any); and
(iv) the additional
information to be provided by way of notes;
comprised in each
Financial Statement; or
(e) the Accounting
Documents;
to ensure that they
are consistent with, and give effect fully to:
(aa) modifications
of any of the Conditions in Schedule 1 of this Licence;
(bb) final Orders
made under section 16 of the Act;
(cc) formal undertakings
given by the Licensee to the Director following investigations by him
into possible contraventions by the Licensee of any of the Conditions
in Schedule 1 to this Licence; and
(dd) directions,
consents and determinations given or made by the Director from time
to time under any of the Conditions in Schedule 1 of this Licence;
made or given on
or after the date on which this Condition comes into force together
with, in each case, any published explanations and reasons given by
the Director in connection with any of the matters specified in sub-paragraphs
(aa) to (dd) provided that the requirements of this paragraph shall
be suspended pending the final disposal of any proceedings seeking to
have any such final Orders, directions, consents, or determinations,
quashed, set aside, modified or varied.
20B.17 If the Director
is considering whether a determination, direction or consent under this
Condition is appropriate, he shall notify the Licensee and Interested
Parties of his proposed decision or the options which he is considering,
and his reasons, and give them a reasonable opportunity to make representations.
On making or refusing a determination or direction or giving or refusing
consent, he shall notify the Licensee and Interested Parties of the
determination, direction or consent or refusal, as the case may be,
and his reasons.
20B.18 (a) Where
the Director has reasonable grounds to believe that:
(i) the Licensee
has done or is doing any of the things specified in paragraph 20B.15
or Condition 18 or both; or
(ii) the Licensee:
(aa) has within
the previous six years (excluding any period before the date on which
this Condition comes into force) shown undue preference to, or exercised
undue discrimination against, any Operator in respect of the provision
or Quality of a Standard Service or Private Circuit or International
Private Circuit (defined in Condition 24B) telecommunication service
contrary to the provisions of Condition 17 or Condition 17B or both
and has ceased to do so but is likely to repeat that undue preference
or undue discrimination at any time in the future; or
(bb) is showing
undue preference or undue discrimination as described in sub paragraph
(a) (ii) (aa); or
(iii) the Licensee
is in breach of this Condition; or
(iv) any or all
of the Accounting Documents, the Financial Statements, the Restated
Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements are deficient;
the Licensee shall,
without prejudice to Condition 52, extend its prompt co-operation to
the Director, his representatives and members of his staff and, in particular,
on the Director’s reasonable request shall:
(A) furnish the
Director in accordance with his reasonable requirements with any information,
documents, accounts, estimates, returns, reports or other information
(including, without limitation, any facility enabling him to read data
not held in readable form);
(B) on reasonable
notice by him allow at all reasonable times the Director, his representatives
and any member of his staff on production of his special authority access
to any relevant premises of the Licensee to investigate, assess, examine,
review or verify any of its accounting records or accounting and reporting
arrangements, systems or processes; and
(C) for the purpose
of sub-paragraph (B), allow the Director, his representatives and any
member of his staff to be accompanied by any person whom the Director
may specify, being a person to whom the Licensee has raised no reasonable
objection, whose assistance the Director might reasonably require: Provided
that the Director has given the Licensee notice (which save in exceptional
circumstances shall be of at least 5 working days) of the identity of
that person.
`(b) If, as a result
of any investigation, assessment, examination or review referred to
in sub-paragraph (a), the Director is satisfied that:
(i) the Licensee
has done or is doing any of the things referred to in sub-paragraph
(a) (i) to (iii);
(ii) any or all
of the Accounting Documents, the Financial Statements, the Restated
Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements are deficient;
or
(iii) he has insufficient
information to conclude whether or not the Licensee has done or is doing
any of the things referred to in sub-paragraph (a) (i) to (iii);
he may direct with
effect from the date specified in the direction, without prejudice to
his other powers under this Licence, that:
(i) the Licensee
shall amend any or all of:
(aa) the composition
of any or all of the Businesses in terms of any or all of the revenues,
costs and assets they respectively comprise;
(bb) the manner
in which any or all of the Businesses are disaggregated in terms of
activities of the relevant Business;
(cc) the form and
content of any or all of the profit and loss account, the statement
of mean capital employed, statements of costs and the additional information
to be provided by way of notes comprised in the Financial Statements,
the Restated Financial Statements or the Interim Financial Statements
of any or all of the Businesses; and
(dd) any or all
of the Accounting Documents; or
(ii) the Licensee
shall divide any or all of the Businesses to create additional Businesses,
or aggregate them to create fewer Businesses;
or both: Provided
that any direction given pursuant to this sub-paragraph shall relate
to the results of the relevant investigation, assessment, examination
or review referred to in sub-paragraph (a) in respect of which the direction
is given.
20B.19 This Condition
operates without prejudice to Conditions 20 and 20A.
20B.20 In this Condition:
‘Accounting Documents’
means together the Accounting Policies, the Attribution Methods, the
Regulatory Accounting Principles, the Transfer Charging System and the
Long Run Incremental Cost Methodology;
‘Accounting Policies’
means the manner in which the requirements of the Companies Act 1985,
the Accounting Standards and the accounting policies applied by the
Licensee in the preparation of its annual statutory financial statements,
where relevant and appropriate, are applied in each of the Financial
Statements, the Restated Financial Statements and the Interim Financial
Statements as agreed in writing between the Director and the Licensee
on or before the date on which this Condition comes into force, as amended
from time to time in accordance with this Condition;
‘Accounting Standards’
has the meaning given to it in the Companies Act 1985;
‘attributable’ includes
allocatable and apportionable, ‘attribute’ includes allocate and apportion
and ‘attribution’ includes allocation and apportionment;
‘Attribution Methods’
means the practices used to attribute revenue (including appropriate
transfer charges), costs (including appropriate transfer charges), assets
and liabilities to a Business or, insofar as that Business has been
disaggregated in terms of activities of that Business, to each activity
of that Business as agreed in writing between the Director and the Licensee
on or before the date on which this Condition comes into force, as amended
from time to time in accordance with this Condition;
‘Auditing Standards’
means United Kingdom auditing standards and guidelines issued from time
to time by the Auditing Practices Board and its predecessor body, the
Auditing Standards Board;
‘Auditor’ has the
meaning given to it in Condition 20;
‘Businesses’ means
the businesses (including the Network Business and the Retail Systems
Business) comprising the revenues, costs and assets as agreed in writing
between the Director and the Licensee on or before the date on which
this Condition comes into force, as amended in accordance with this
Condition and ‘Business’ means any one of them;
‘Detailed Attribution
Methods’, ‘Detailed Valuation Methodology’ and ‘Long Run Incremental
Cost Model: Relationship and Parameters’ mean the documents with those
titles containing the further details of the systems and processes for
deriving or calculating the costs, revenues, assets and liabilities
which are used by the Licensee, in addition to the descriptions in the
Accounting Documents, to prepare the Financial Statements, the Restated
Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements;
‘Interested Parties’
has the meaning given to it in Condition 13;
‘Long Run Incremental
Cost Methodology’ means the long run incremental cost principles and
modelling processes which form the framework under which LRIC statements
are prepared as agreed in writing between the Director and the Licensee
on or before the date on which this definition comes into force, as
amended from time to time in accordance with this Condition;
‘Major Office’ has
the meaning given to it in Condition 13;
‘Operator’ has the
meaning given to it in Condition 13;
‘Quality’ has the
meaning given to it in Condition 13;
‘Regulatory Accounting
Principles’ means the principles agreed in writing between the Director
and the Licensee on or before the date on which this Condition comes
into force, as amended from time to time in accordance with this Condition;
‘Residual Business’
means the business or businesses of which the revenues, costs and assets
are not comprised in any Business as agreed between the Director and
the Licensee in accordance with this Condition, as amended from time
to time in accordance with this Condition;
‘Standard Service’
has the meaning given to it in Condition 16B; and
‘Transfer Charging
System’ means the system which enables a Business to use a service or
good from another Business and to account for it as though it had purchased
that service or good, as agreed in writing between the Director and
the Licensee on or before the date on which this Condition comes into
force, as amended from time to time in accordance with this Condition.

Annex
B
Condition
78 of BT’s Licence. This replaces Condition 20.B.
SEPARATE ACCOUNTS
78.1
The whole
purpose of this Condition is:
(a) to
ensure that the Licensee does not unfairly subsidise or unfairly crosssubsidise
or
show undue preference or exercise undue discrimination; and
(b)
without
prejudice to sub-paragraph (a), to assist the Director, in pursuance
of his
functions, to examine or investigate whether:
(i)
interconnection
charges offered or proposed to be offered by the Licensee
to an Operator or payable by an Operator to the Licensee; or
(ii)
to the
extent that the Licensee’s costs are relevant, interconnection charges
offered or proposed to be offered by an Operator to the Licensee or
payable by the Licensee to an Operator, are
reasonably and transparently derived from costs.
78.2
(a)
Subject to paragraph 78.14 and subject to a requirement that there
shall be a Network Business:
(i)
the composition
of each Business in terms of any or all of the revenues, costs or assets
it comprises may be amended; and
(ii) each
Business may be divided to create one or more additional Businesses
or aggregated to create one or more fewer Businesses;
as
the Director and the Licensee agree from time to time in writing.
(b)
Each Business
shall be disaggregated in terms of the activities of the Business on
the basis agreed between the Licensee and the Director on or before
the date on which this Condition comes into force. Subject to paragraph
78.14 that disaggregation may be amended by agreement in writing between
the Licensee and the Director.
(c) "Network
Business" means the Business which includes the revenues, costs
and assets derived from or used in activities related to Interconnection
taken together.
78.3
The Licensee
shall establish sufficient accounting and reporting arrangements to
comply with its obligations under this Condition.
78.4
(a)
Except
to the extent the Director may otherwise consent, the Licensee shall
maintain accounting records in a form:
(i) which
enables each Business and, insofar as it has been disaggregated in terms
of activities of the Business, each of the activities of that Business,
to be separately identified or the costs, revenues and assets of each
Business and, insofar as it has been disaggregated in terms of activities
of the Business, the costs, revenues and assets of each of those activities,
to be separately attributable, on an historic cost basis;
(ii) which
enables each Business, and, insofar as it has been disaggregated in
terms of activities of the Business, each of the activities of that
Business, to be separately identified or the costs, revenues and assets
of each Business, and, insofar as it has been disaggregated in terms
of activities of the Business, each of the
activities of that Business, to be separately attributable, on a current
cost basis; and
(iii) which
shows and explains the transactions of each Business and, insofar as
it has been disaggregated in terms of activities of the Business, the
transactions of each of the activities of that Business.
(b) The
accounting records referred to in sub-paragraph (a) shall be kept in
a form which enables the Licensee to prepare the Financial Statements:
(i) in
the case of each Business, on an historic cost basis; and
(ii) in
the case of each Business, on a current cost basis, which comply, in
each case, with the requirements of this Condition.
(c) Records
sufficient to provide an adequate explanation of each Financial Statement,
each Restated Financial Statement and each Interim Financial Statement
shall be preserved by the Licensee for a period of six years from the
date on which they were made.
78.5
(a) Except
to the extent the Director may otherwise consent, the Licensee shall
prepare in accordance with paragraph 78.6, in respect of each of its
financial years:
(i)
beginning
with the financial year ending 31 March 1995 and ending with the financial
year ending 31 March 1999, a financial statement on an historic cost
basis, in respect of each Business and, insofar as it has been disaggregated
in terms of activities of the Business, each activity of
that Business; and
(ii)
without
prejudice to any requirements for the preparation and audit of the current
cost Financial Statements for the financial year ending 31 March 1997
in effect on 30 September 1997, beginning with the financial year ending
on 31 March 1998, a financial statement on a current cost basis, in
respect of each Business and, insofar as it has been disaggregated in
terms of activities of the Business, each activity of that Business,
(each a "Financial Statement" and together the "Financial
Statements").
(b) Each
Financial Statement prepared for the purposes of sub-paragraph (a)(i)
on an historic cost basis shall comprise:
(i) a
statement of fully allocated costs calculated on a basis which is not
inconsistent with the Licensee’s statutory accounts for the relevant
financial
year;
(ii)
a profit
and loss account, a statement of mean capital employed,
statements of costs (if applicable) and additional information
to be provided by way of notes for the relevant financial year; and
(iii) an
explanation and reconciliation of any differences between the
statement mentioned in sub-paragraph (i) and the matters mentioned
in sub-paragraph (ii).
(c) Without
prejudice to any requirements for the preparation and audit of the current
cost Financial Statements for the financial year ending 31 March 1997
in effect on 30 September 1997, except to the extent that the Director
may otherwise consent, beginning with the financial year ending 31 March
1998, each Financial Statement prepared for the purposes of sub-paragraph
(a)(ii) on a
current cost basis shall comprise:
(i)
a statement
of fully allocated costs calculated on a basis which is not inconsistent
with the Licensee’s statutory accounts for the relevant financial
year;
(ii)
a profit
and loss account, a statement of mean capital employed, statements of
costs and additional information to be provided by way of
notes for the relevant financial year;
(iii)
in the
case of the Network Business, statements of long run incremental costs
with and without hybrid adjustments and additional information to be
provided by way of notes for the relevant financial year;
(iv)
in the
case of the Network Business, a statement for Retail Systems Business
purchases from the Network Business and a statement of detailed long
run incremental costs by bands and additional information to be provided
by way of notes for the relevant financial year;
and
(v)
an explanation
and reconciliation of any differences between the statement mentioned
in sub-paragraph (i) and the matters mentioned in sub-paragraph (ii),
of any differences between the statements mentioned in sub-paragraph
(iii) and the statements mentioned in subparagraph (iv) and of any differences
between the statements without hybrid adjustments mentioned in sub-paragraph
(iii) and the statement for
the Network Business mentioned in sub-paragraph (i).
(d)
The Licensee
shall also prepare, in accordance with paragraph 78.6, in respect of
each of its financial years beginning with the financial year ending
31 March
2000 a statement ("Standard Service Statement") of costs of
and charges for each Standard Service.
78.6
(a) The
Licensee shall ensure that each Financial Statement shall:
(i) be
prepared as to the form and content of:
(A) the
profit and loss account;
(B) the
statement of mean capital employed; and
(C)
the statements of costs (if applicable);
as the Licensee and the Director shall have agreed, on or before the
date on which this Condition comes into force (or, in the case of the
statements of costs required under paragraph 78.5(c)(iii) and 78.5(c)(iv),
as the Licensee and Director shall have agreed on or before the date
on which paragraph 78.5(c) as substituted comes into force) together
with such additional information to be provided by way of notes as the
Licensee and the Director shall from time to time agree;
(ii) be
prepared in accordance with the current Detailed Attribution Methods,
Detailed Valuation Methodology and Long Run Incremental Cost Model:
Relationship and Parameters (which taken together are appropriate to
implement the principles and procedures contained in the Accounting
Documents) and the Accounting Documents (the Accounting Documents, the
Detailed Attribution Methods, the Detailed Valuation Methodology and
the Long Run Incremental Costs Model: Relationships and Parameters shall
be identified in the Financial Statements by reference to their date)
and insofar as there is any inconsistency between any or all of the
Accounting Documents listed below, the Licensee shall ensure that each
Financial Statement shall be prepared in accordance with the Accounting
Documents in the following
order of priority:
(A) the
Regulatory Accounting Principles;
(B) the
Attribution Methods;
(C) the
Transfer Charging System;
(D) the
Accounting Policies; and
(E) Long
Run Incremental Cost Methodology; and
(iii)
subject to sub-paragraph
(ii), in the case of the Financial Statements prepared
on:
(A)
an historic
cost basis, be reconciled with the annual statutory financial statements
and that reconciliation shall be demonstrated and explained;
(B) a
current fully allocated cost basis, be:
(AA) reconciled
with the accounts which the Licensee is required to publish under Condition
77 and that reconciliation shall be demonstrated
and explained;
(BB)
reconciled
with the Financial Statements prepared on an historic cost basis for
the corresponding financial year (ending with the financial year ending
31 March 1999) and that reconciliation shall be demonstrated and explained;
and
(CC) (beginning
with the financial year ending 31 March 2000) reconciled with the annual
statutory financial statements and that
reconciliation shall be demonstrated and explained.
(b)
Subject
to paragraph 78.14, the form and content referred to in sub-paragraph
(a)(i) may be amended as the Director and the Licensee agree from time
to time
in writing.
(c)
The Licensee
shall ensure that each Standard Service Statement shall be prepared:
(i)
as to
the form and content as the Licensee and the Director shall have agreed,
on or before the date on which this Condition comes into force; and
(ii)
in accordance
with paragraph 78.6(a)(ii), provided that, subject to paragraph 78.14,
the form and content may be amended
as the Director and the Licensee agree from time to time in writing.
(d)
Any requirement
to which the Licensee would otherwise be subject under paragraph 78.6
and paragraph 78.5(d) shall not apply if, or to the extent that, the
Licensee can demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director,
in respect of which the Licensee shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity
to present
its case, that the requirement is not proportionate.
78.7
The Licensee
shall procure in respect of each Financial Statement for each Business
an audit report by the Auditor which shall conform to Auditing Standards
in which he
shall state whether in his opinion:
(a)
the Financial
Statement complies with the requirements of paragraph 78.6;
(b) the
Financial Statement fairly presents in accordance with the Accounting
Documents:
(i)
in the case of
the profit and loss account, the results of the relevant
Business or, insofar as it has been disaggregated in terms of
activities of the Business, of the relevant activity of that Business,
for the relevant
financial year;
(ii)
in the
case of the statement of mean capital employed, the mean capital employed
of the relevant Business or, insofar as the Business has been disaggregated
in terms of activities of the Business, of the relevant activity of
that Business, for the relevant financial year; and
(iii) in
the case of the statements of costs (if any), the costs incurred by
the relevant Business or, insofar as the Business has been disaggregated
in terms of the activities of the Business, by the relevant activities
of that Business, for the relevant financial year; and
(c) the
Detailed Attribution Methods, the Detailed Valuation Methodology and
the
Long Run Incremental Cost Model: Relationship and Parameters, respectively,
are appropriate to implement the principles contained in the Accounting
Documents.
78.7A
The Licensee
shall procure in respect of each Standard Service Statement, unless
the Licensee can demonstrate, to the reasonable satisfaction of the
Director, in respect of which the Licensee shall be afforded a reasonable
opportunity to present its case, that the requirement to procure an
audit opinion on a specific Standard Service Statement
is not proportionate, an audit report by the Licensee’s Auditor which
shall conform to Auditing Standards in which the Auditor shall state
whether in his opinion:
(a) the Standard Service Statement complies with the requirements of
paragraph 78.6(c)(i);
(b) the Standard Service Statement has been properly prepared in accordance
with the relevant procedures contained in the Accounting Documents,
the Detailed Attribution Methods, the Detailed Valuation Methodology
and the Long Run Incremental Cost Model: Relationships and Parameters;
and
(c) having reviewed the Accounting Documents, the Detailed Attribution
Methods, the Detailed Valuation Methodology and the Long Run Incremental
Cost Model: Relationships and Parameters in forming his opinion under
(b) above, anything has come to his attention that would lead him to
conclude that the principles and procedures contained in the Accounting
Documents, the Detailed Attribution Methods, the Detailed Valuation
Methodology and the Long Run Incremental Cost Model: Relationships and
Parameters have not been properly applied in the preparation of the
costs and charges disclosed in any Standard Service Statement, disclosing
where practicable any adjustments he considers to be required in respect
of any such matter.
78.8
(a) The
Licensee shall, except in so far as the Director may otherwise consent:
(i) publish
the Financial Statements prepared on an historic cost basis within two
months after the date on which the Licensee’s annual statutory financial
statements are published and, in any event, within four months after
the end of the period to which they relate;
(ii) without
prejudice to any requirements for publication of the Financial Statements
for the financial year ending 31 March 1997 in effect on 30 September
1997, publish the Financial Statements prepared on a current cost basis:
(A) for
the financial year ending 31 March 1998, by 30 November 1998;
(B) for
the financial year ending 31 March 1999, by 31 August 1999; and
(C) for
each subsequent financial year, within four months after the end of
the period to which they relate, together,
in each case, with the relevant Auditor’s report as required under paragraphs
78.7 and 78.7A.
(b)
For the
purposes of sub-paragraph (a), publication shall be effected by making
the relevant Financial Statements together with the relevant Auditor’s
reports (if
applicable) publicly available and by sending copies to the Director.
(c) The
Licensee shall send a copy of the Financial Statements together with
the relevant Auditor’s report (if applicable) to any person who may
(after they have been published pursuant to sub-paragraph (a)) request
them, on the basis of that person paying a reasonable charge for them.
The Licensee shall send the
copies within seven working days after receiving payment of that charge.
(d)
Except
to the extent that the Director may consent to an alternative location
or to an alternative method of publication, the Licensee shall make
available and continue to make available in a publicly accessible part
of every Major Office of the Licensee in such manner and in such place
that it is readily available for inspection free of charge by members
of the general public during such hours as the Secretary of State may
prescribe under section 19(4) of the Act that the register of Licences
and final and provisional orders is to be open for public inspection,
or in the absence of any such order having been made by the Secretary
of State, during normal office hours, a notice of the address and telephone
number of the person to whom any request for a copy of any or all of
the Financial Statements together with the relevant Auditor’s reports
or any part of them may be made.
(e)
The Licensee
shall also publish with the Financial Statements any written statement
made by the Director commenting on the data in, the notes to or the
presentation of the Statements (or any of them) which has been provided
to the Licensee at least 4 working days before publication of the relevant
Statements. Sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) shall apply to the publication
of the Director’s statement. In order to give the Director sufficient
time before publication to prepare a statement, except to the extent
that the Director otherwise agrees in writing, the Licensee shall provide
to the Director the current drafts of the relevant Statements one month
before they are required to be published under this Condition and the
Licensee shall provide to the Director copies of the relevant Statements
audited in accordance with paragraphs 78.7 and 78.7A together
with the Auditor’s report at least two weeks before they are required
to be published.
78.9
(a) Subject
to paragraphs 78.13 and 78.14, the Accounting Documents may be amended
as the Director and the Licensee agree from time to time in writing.
(b) Except
to the extent that the Director may otherwise consent, the Licensee
shall not make any change to the way in which it attributes, or applies
the principles of current cost valuation or incremental costing to the
derivation or calculation of, costs, revenues, assets or liabilities
if that change would cause a change in the distributed long run incremental
cost floor or distributed stand alone cost ceiling relevant to any Standard
Service of 5 percent or more.
78.10
The Licensee
shall use its best endeavours to obtain from the Auditor any further
explanation and clarification of the reports required under paragraphs
78.7 and 78.7A and any other information in respect of the matters which
are the subject of the reports as the Director shall reasonably require.
78.11
(a) The
Licensee shall publish details of the definitions of the Businesses
as soon as practicable after the coming into force of this Condition
and shall publish details of any amendment to the composition, or any
division or aggregation, of a Business as soon as practicable, and in
any event within 28 days, after the making
of the amendment.
(b)
On the
direction of the Director, the Licensee shall publish the current Accounting
Documents or the current Detailed Attribution Methods, Detailed Valuation
Methodology or Long Run Incremental Cost Model: Relationship and Parameters
as soon as practicable, and in any event within 28 days, after the making
of the direction. The Licensee may exclude from publication any matter
the exclusion of which the Director has directed.
(c) The
Licensee shall publish any amendment to the Accounting Documents published
in accordance with paragraph 78.11(b), as soon as practicable, and in
any event within 28 days, after the making of the amendment.
(d)
For the
purposes of sub-paragraphs (a) to (c) publication shall be effected
by making the required matters publicly available and by sending copies
to the Director.
(e)
(i) The
Licensee shall send a copy of each of the required matters or any of
them to any person who may (after the expiry of the period specified
in each of sub-paragraphs (a) to (c)) request them, on the basis of
that person paying a reasonable charge for them. The Licensee shall
send the copies within seven working days after receiving payment of
that charge.
(ii)
The Licensee shall send a copy of a description of its cost accounting
system showing the main categories under which costs are grouped and
the rules used for the allocation of costs to Interconnection, to any
person who may request them, on the basis of that person paying a reasonable
charge for them. The Licensee shall send the copies within seven
working days after receiving payment of that charge.
(f)
Except
to the extent that the Director may consent to an alternative location
or to an alternative method of publication, the Licensee shall make
available and continue to make available in a publicly accessible part
of every Major Office of the Licensee in such manner and in such place
that it is readily available for inspection free of charge by members
of the general public during such hours as the Secretary of State may
prescribe under section 19(4) of the Act that the register of Licences
and final and provisional orders is to be open for public inspection,
or in the absence of any such order having been made by the Secretary
of State, during normal office hours, a notice of the address and telephone
number of the person to whom any request for a copy of any or all of
the required matters may be made.
78.12
Without
prejudice to Condition 75, where the Director is satisfied, on the basis
of the most up to date information which has been made available to
him at the relevant time,
that the Licensee:
(a)
has within the previous six years (excluding any period before the date
on which this Condition comes into force) unfairly subsidised or unfairly
cross subsidised and has ceased to unfairly subsidise or unfairly cross
subsidise but is likely to repeat that unfair subsidy or unfair cross
subsidy at any time in the future;
or
(b)
is unfairly
subsidising or unfairly cross subsidising;
either:
(i)
any or
all of the Businesses other than the Residual Business; or
(ii) any
part or parts of any of the Businesses other than the Residual Business
where the Director is satisfied that unfair subsidy or unfair cross
subsidy, as the case may be, has or could have a material effect on
competition in the United Kingdom in relation to the activity to which
the unfair subsidy or unfair cross subsidy relates; or both, it shall
take such steps as the Director may direct for the purpose of remedying
the situation.
78.13
The Licensee
shall, with the consent of the Director, make such amendments as are
from time to time required to:
(a)
the definition
of each Business in terms of the revenues, costs and assets comprised
in it;
(b) the
number of Businesses for the purposes of this Condition;
(c)
the manner in which each Business may be disaggregated;
(d)
the form and content of:
(i)
the profit
and loss account;
(ii)
the statement of mean capital employed;
(iii)
the statements of costs (if any); and
(iv)
the additional information to be provided by way of notes; comprised
in each Financial Statement; or
(e)
the Accounting
Documents, to ensure that they are consistent with, and give effect
fully to:
(A) modifications
of any of the Conditions in Schedule 1 of this Licence;
(B) final
Orders made under section 16 of the Act;
(C)
formal undertakings given by the Licensee to the Director following
investigations by him into possible contraventions by the
Licensee of any of the Conditions in Schedule 1 to this Licence; and
(D)
directions,
consents and determinations given or made by the Director from time
to time under any of the Conditions in Schedule 1 of this Licence; made
or given on or after the date on which this Condition comes into force
together with, in each case, any published explanations and reasons
given by the Director in connection with any of the matters specified
in sub-paragraphs (A) to (D) provided that the requirements of this
paragraph shall be suspended pending the final disposal of any proceedings
seeking to have any such final Orders, directions, consents, or determinations,
quashed, set aside, modified
or varied.
78.14
(a) Where
the Director has reasonable grounds to believe that:
(i) the
Licensee has done or is doing any of the things specified in paragraph
78.12 or Condition 75 or both;
(ii) the
Licensee:
(A) has
within the previous six years (excluding any period before the date
on which this Condition comes into force) shown undue preference to,
or exercised undue discrimination against, any Operator in respect of
the provision or Quality of any or all of a Standard Service, a Private
Leased Circuit or an International Private Circuit telecommunication
service contrary to the provisions of Part G of this Licence and has
ceased to do so but is likely to repeat that undue preference or undue
discrimination at any time in the future; or
(B)
is showing undue preference or undue discrimination as described
in sub-paragraph 78.14(a)(ii)(A);
(iii) the
Licensee is in breach of this Condition; or
(iv) any
or all of the Accounting Documents, the Financial Statements, the Restated
Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements are deficient;
the Licensee shall, without prejudice to Condition 33, extend its prompt
cooperation to the Director, his representatives and members of his
staff and, in
particular, on the Director’s reasonable request shall:
(A) furnish
the Director in accordance with his reasonable requirements with any
information, documents, accounts, estimates, returns, reports or other
information (including, without limitation, any facility enabling him
to read data not held in readable form);
(B) on
reasonable notice by him allow at all reasonable times the Director,
his representatives and any member of his staff on production of his
special authority access to any relevant premises of the Licensee to
investigate, assess, examine, review or verify any of its accounting
records or accounting and reporting arrangements, systems or processes;
and
(C) for
the purposes of sub-paragraph (B) above, allow the Director, his representatives
and any member of his staff to be accompanied by any person whom the
Director may specify, being a person to whom the Licensee has raised
no reasonable objection, whose assistance the Director might reasonably
require; Provided that the Director has given the Licensee notice (which
save in exceptional circumstances shall be of at least 5 working days)
of the identity of that person.
(b) If,
as a result of any investigation, assessment, examination or review
referred to
in sub-paragraph (a), the Director is satisfied that:
(i)
the Licensee has done or is doing any of the things referred to in subparagraph
(a)
(i) to (iii);
(ii)
any or
all of the Accounting Documents, the Financial Statements, the
Restated Financial Statements and the Interim Financial Statements
are deficient; or
(iii) he
has insufficient information to conclude whether or not the Licensee
has done or is doing any of the things referred to in sub-paragraph
(a) (i) to (iii), he may direct with effect from the date specified
in the direction, without prejudice to his other powers under this Licence,
that:
(iv)
the Licensee shall amend any or all of:
(A) the
composition of any or all of the Businesses in terms of any or all of
the revenues, costs and assets they respectively comprise;
(B) the
manner in which any or all of the Businesses are disaggregated in terms
of activities of the relevant Business;
(C) the
form and content of any or all of the profit and loss account, the statement
of mean capital employed, statements of costs and the additional information
to be provided by way of notes comprised in the Financial Statements,
the Restated Financial Statements or the Interim Financial Statements
of any or all of the
Businesses; and
(D)
any or
all of the Accounting Documents; or
(v)
the Licensee
shall divide any or all of the Businesses to create additional Businesses,
or aggregate them to create fewer Businesses; or both; Provided that
any direction given pursuant to this sub-paragraph shall relate to the
results of the relevant investigation, assessment, examination or review
referred to in sub-paragraph (a) in respect of which the direction is
given.
78.15
This Condition
operates without prejudice to Conditions 76 and 77.
78.16
This Condition is subject to the obligations which apply to the Licensee
under Condition 50.
78.17
In this Condition "attributable" includes allocatable and
apportionable, "attribute"
includes allocate and apportion and "attribution" includes
allocation and apportionment.

ANNEX
C
DRAFT
REVOCATION OF THE MNS DIRECTION
Pursuant
to Paragraph 7 of the Public Telecommunications Licence granted to British
Telecommunications plc
WHEREAS
1. The Secretary
of the State granted to British Telecommunications on 22 June 1984
a licence (the ‘BT Licence’) under section 7 of the Telecommunications
Act 1984 (the ‘Act’) for the running of the telecommunication systems
specified in Annex A to that licence;
2. By virtue of
Section 109 of and paragraph 20 of Schedule 5 to the Act, the BT Licence
has effect as if granted to British Telecommunications plc (‘BT’);
3. Condition 20B.15
of BT’s Licence (now contained in Condition 78 of BT’s Licence) allowed
the Director to make a direction where he was satisfied, on the basis
of the most up to date information which had been made available to
him, that BT was unfairly subsidising part of its Business (except
Residual Business) and that the subsidy had, or could have had, a
material effect on competition in the United Kingdom;
4. Paragraph 7
of the BT Licence allows the Director General of Telecommunications
(the ‘Director’) to revoke a direction made pursuant to BT’s Licence;
5. In 1992 four
complainants alleged anti-competitive practice by MNS, centring on
unfair subsidy of MNS's activities from its systems business and predatory
pricing in the provision of value-added data services and misuse of
customer information. In December 1994 the Director General expressed
his concern that a lengthy investigation had proved inconclusive because
of limitations in the financial information available to him from
within BT. He stated his intention to verify the adequacy of accounting
improvements BT was making in 1994/5 and 1995/6, and then to return
to the original allegations.
6. In February
1996 the Director General announced that he had been satisfied that
there was no need for further action in six of the eight areas examined.
However, in two important areas this was not so: adequacy of internal
accounting controls within BT's core business over charges to other
parts of BT (such as MNS), and whether customers were charged all
relevant costs for services offered by MNS. Therefore, on 7 February
1996, the Director General made a direction (under Condition 20.B.15
of its Licence) requiring BT to take steps to ensure that it does
not unfairly subsidise or cross-subsidise parts of its MNS business
(the "Direction").
7. The Direction
requires BT:
- not to cross-subsidise
individual contracts above a certain size and not to cross-subsidise
each of the Activities listed in the Direction;
- to make an
appropriate return on each of the Activities listed;
- to provide
him with a business plan showing how this is to be achieved;
- to keep records
and provide ongoing information on the financial performance of
the Activities; and
- to show that
charges between MNS and other parts of BT's businesses are properly
based and charged, in particular by providing an external audit
report.
8. BT argues that
it has met the terms of the Direction fully and that BT has appropriate
systems in place to prevent any further breach in the relevant market.
BT also points out that the relevant parts referred to in the Direction
no longer exist as discrete products. BT has therefore approached
the Director and asked for the Direction to be reviewed;
9. Having carefully
considered all of the concerns raised by respondents with regard to
the state of competition in the relevant markets, the Director, for
the reasons set out in the statement accompanying this revocation,
considers that it is no longer appropriate to retain the Direction;
10. The Director,
therefore, considers it appropriate to revoke the Direction;
11. A draft of
this revocation was published on [ ].
THEREFORE
1. Pursuant
to paragraph 7 of the BT Licence the Director hereby revokes the
Direction with immediate effect.
2. Except as
otherwise defined in this Revocation:
2.1 paragraph
4 of the BT Licence shall, with the necessary changes, apply to
this Revocation as it applies to the BT Licence; and
2.2 terms defined
in the BT Licence or in the recitals hereto shall have the same
meanings for the purposes of this Revocation.
Peter Waller
DIRECTO |