A Statement
issued by the Director General of Telecommunications
Contents
Summary
Chapter
1 Background
Chapter
2 Summary of responses to the proposed revisions and the Director’s
comments
Chapter
3 Summary of changes to the draft revised Number Portability Functional
Specification
Annex
A Number Portability Functional Specification, Issue No 4
Annex
B List of respondents to the consultation
Summary
S.1 Number portability
is a facility provided by telecoms operators or service providers to
enable subscribers to keep their telephone numbers when changing their
supplier.
S.2 The Functional
Specification is a document, published from time to time by the Director
General of Telecommunications (the "Director"), which specifies technical
and other principles which are intended to enable the efficient implementation
and utilisation of portability.
S.3 In this statement,
the Director summarises and comments on the responses to his consultation
of June 2001 on proposals to make certain revisions to the Functional
Specification.
S.4 The Director
considers that his proposed compromise arrangements to ensure that service
providers comply with their obligations to provide number portability
in respect of fixed services, is that which is most likely to ensure
that subscribers are provided with number portability in a timely manner.
Therefore, operators will retain a role in ensuring compliance in circumstances
where they directly sub-allocate numbers to service providers. The Director
has, however, decided to review this issue as part of the forthcoming
European Directives implementation process. This must be in place by
July 2003.
S.5 The Director
has decided to carry out further consultation on the potential impacts
of his proposed relaxation of those restrictions that deprive customers,
when or having changed their supplier, from having a greater degree
of flexibility to move location and keep their ported geographic numbers.
It is anticipated that a consultation document will be published before
the end of the year or early 2003.
S.6 Issue number
4 of the number portability Functional Specification, incorporating
the changes arising as a result of this consultation exercise, is at
Annex A. This will take effect from 12 September 2002.

Chapter
1
Background
1.1 The UK number
portability regulatory regime, whether through licence conditions or,
in the case of unlicensed service providers, through free standing regulations,
require the provision of portability in accordance with the rules set
out in the Functional Specification. For the avoidance of doubt, operators
and service providers must comply with their portability obligations
which require that subscribers’ requests to keep their numbers independently
of the undertaking providing the service are met, as provided for in
European Community legislation. The Functional Specification deals with
technical and other principles that are intended to enable the efficient
implementation and utilisation of portability. However, nothing contained
in (or, as the case may be, not contained in) the Functional Specification
overrides the aforementioned obligations to enable subscribers to keep
their numbers.
1.2 In June 2001,
the Director General of Telecommunications (the "Director") published
a consultative document seeking comments on proposed revisions to the
current Functional Specification (Issue number 3 of 30 June 1998).
1.3 These proposals
covered three main areas. These were:
- To bring the
Functional Specification into line with changes to UK legislation
following the coming into force of the number portability provisions
of the Interconnection Directive (97/33/EC) by amendments provided
for in the Numbering Directive (98/61/EC). This includes the extension
of number ranges to which number portability applies and the obligations
and responsibilities of systemless service providers.
- To relax the
requirement that licensed operators ensure that unlicensed service
providers provide fixed number portability so that such responsibilities
are limited to those service providers to whom licensees directly
allocate numbers.
- To relax the
current mobility rule to offer telecoms companies greater flexibility
to meet customer demand to be able to keep their numbers when changing
their supplier and moving address.
1.4 Oftel received
eight responses to its consultation. A list of respondents can be found
at Annex B.
1.5 A summary of
the issues raised by the respondents and the Director’s comments are
set out in chapter 2; a summary of non-material changes to the draft
revised Functional Specification, as detailed in the above-mentioned
consultation document, are set out in chapter 3.
1.6 A list of definitions
of the terms used in this statement is included within the Functional
Specification Issue No 4 at Annex A. For this reason, this statement
does not contain a glossary.

Chapter
2 Summary of responses to the proposed revisions and the Director’s
comments
Section 1, Donor
Operator’s Rules, rule 2
Original
proposal
2.1 To modify the
rule regarding the donor operator’s obligation to notify certain parties
where unforeseen technical constraints arise, to further clarify that
the donor operator’s ability to provide portability is a regulatory
requirement.
Responses
2.2 Colt sought
clarification as to whether this rule applies prior to, or after, a
subscriber number has been ported.
Director’s
comment
2.3 This is not
a response relating to the proposed revision but which seemingly seeks
clarification on a rule that has been in place since Issue 1 of 29 July
1996. The rule requires the donor operator to notify certain parties,
in the event it experiences technical constraints effecting the provision
of portability in respect of new subscriber numbers. This rule, therefore,
applies to numbers before they have been ported, whereas section 2,
recipient operator’s rules, rule 2 deals with circumstances which may
arise after a number has been ported. It is a matter for the donor to
determine which recipient operators it notifies but, for the purpose
of clarification, the Director considers that this must include any
operator or service provider who has requested portability in respect
of any of the new subscriber numbers concerned.
Section
2, Recipient Operator’s Rules, rule 4
Original
proposal
2.4 To remove the
current rule which restricts recipient operators from only providing
their imported customers with simultaneous or subsequent geographic
mobility within the service area of the donor operator.
2.5 To insert new
rules which require a recipient operator, who chooses to offer its customer
simultaneous or subsequent geographic mobility outside the donor operator’s
service area, to first make clear, in writing, to its customer that
he will be unable to exercise his rights to number portability at that
location. With regard to geographic mobility, the recipient operator
is also responsible for ensuring the integrity of the emergency call
service.
Responses
2.6 Energis, Telewest,
Colt, Cable & Wireless and SACOT welcomed Oftel’s proposal to relax
the current restrictions on geographic mobility. Energis believes that
the present restriction is a commercially, not technically, driven practice
by BT which prevents customers who want mobility to have the freedom
to do so. ntl supports limited mobility by bilateral agreement between
porting partners.
2.7 BT maintains
that Oftel’s proposal seeks to embrace mobility without proper consultation
on the principles and practicalities. It questions the value of geographic
mobility (in terms of both customer demand and the availability of other
products that achieve the same result) and expresses concern about compromising
the customer’s right to number portability including their right to
port back.
2.8 On the basis
that ntl viewed the expansion of mobility beyond the service area of
the donor as obligatory, it raised certain technical issues giving rise
to potential cost implications and invited Oftel to further evaluate
the costs and benefits of its proposal. ntl suggested that Oftel’s proposal
exceeded the provisions of European Community legislation which limits
rights to geographic portability to a specific location, a view shared
by BT. BT also questioned whether Oftel’s proposal brought about sufficient
benefits and was critical that Oftel had not carried out preparatory
work such as the production of a cost benefit analysis.
2.9 Colt disagrees
with Oftel’s proposal regarding the circumstances in which customers
would lose their rights to portability. It believes that customers should
not lose their right to number portability because of mobility, a view
shared by Telewest.
2.10 With regard
to Oftel’s proposal that the recipient ensures that customers are made
fully aware of the consequences of geographic mobility, ntl and Energis
suggested that industry, Oftel and representative consumer bodies work
together to ensure that consumers are provided with information to be
able to make an informed choice. On this point, Colt suggests that the
method of informing customers of their loss of portability rights should
be standardised across industry and documented in the relevant industry
process manual. ntl raised issues regarding the retention of records
and changes of account holders, the latter was also raised by BT.
2.11 As regards
mobility and the 999/112 emergency service issues, ntl and BT urge further
examination of the impacts particularly where the relevant Emergency
Authority is linked to the serving area of the host switch. Cable &
Wireless propose that Oftel makes the recipient requirement regarding
emergency service contact details more explicit by making it a rule
in its own right. Cable & Wireless would also like to see the inclusion
of further advice on the maintenance of customer directory entries.
2.12 ntl and Energis
both argue that where mobility is extended from the service area of
the donor operator up to an entire National Destination Code ("NDC"),
there remain some circumstances where limits should apply. ntl believes
that mobility should not be supported across Northern Ireland (limited
instead to pre number change area code boundaries) or between Portsmouth
and Southampton which is separated by Fareham codes. ntl expressed concern
that the numbering scheme should not be compromised by enhanced mobility
driving up take up of out-of-area services.
2.13 Colt supports
the Oftel proposal to lift the current mobility restriction whilst maintaining
the integrity of the geographic area numbering plan. However, Colt believes
that customers should be able to take their numbers with them within
each numbering area.
Director’s
comments
2.14 The Director
has carefully reviewed his proposals to lift the restriction on recipient
operators from providing imported customers with simultaneous or subsequent
geographic mobility outside the service area of the donor operator.
The Director notes that this proposal, more than any other, elicited
comments and serious concerns from certain industry stakeholders, in
particular from BT and, to a lesser extent, from ntl. In certain instances,
the content of responses to the June 01 consultation suggests that additional
clarification might also prove helpful with particular regard to the
definition of "a specific location" in the context of geographic portability.
2.15 The Director
has therefore decided to further test his proposals by carrying out
consultation on his assessment of the economic impacts which may arise.
In addition, the Director intends to give further clarification on the
legal framework, including on his proposed interpretation of "specific
location", and to invite detailed comments on the same.
2.16 The separate
consultation on geographic number portability and geographic mobility,
and the concatenation of both, is expected to be published before the
end of the year or early 2003. For the avoidance of any doubt, the current
rule containing the above-mentioned restriction will remain unchanged
until such further consultation has taken place and the Director has
decided, having taken into account any responses made, that it is appropriate
to remove the same.
Section
4, Common Rules, rule 10
Original
proposal
2.17 To transfer
this rule to section 4, Common Rules, from section 1, Donor Operator’s
Rules as it is applicable to both donor and recipient operators.
2.18 To relax the
requirement in Issue 3, whereby the donor operator was responsible for
ensuring that any numbers sub-allocated to any service providers (including
mobile service providers) remain capable of being ported between operators.
The amendment proposes to limit this requirement to those circumstances
where an operator has directly
sub-allocated numbers in the context of fixed numbers only.
Responses
2.19 Vodafone, ntl,
BT, Energis and Colt all restated their views, as set out in the original
consultation, that Oftel’s proposed relaxation on the requirement to
ensure sub-allocations of numbers can be ported does not go far enough.
No new views were expressed.
Director’s
comments
2.20 Oftel maintains
its view, as set out previously, that withdrawing the obligation on
operators in full and relying on the enforcement powers to take service
providers to court under the relevant regulations will not result in
the quickest or most effective way of ensuring that customers are able
to take advantage of portability. However, the Director considers that
it is appropriate to review his position as part of the implementation
work on the portability provisions of the Universal Service Directive
(2002/22/EC). This must be completed by July 2003. The regulatory regime
and enforcement powers for number portability will then be consistent
across mobile and fixed services.
Portability rights
2.21 Whilst not
related to the Functional Specification itself, the Director used the
opportunity of the June 01 consultation to respond to queries about
whether the rights afforded to subscribers to be able to keep their
numbers extend also to service providers or resellers. The Director
reasoned that, should the matter be tested in the courts, he considered
it unlikely that it could be successfully argued that service providers,
that are simple resellers, have a right to number portability.
2.22 Whilst most
respondents welcomed this clarification, several maintained that grey
areas still existed particularly in the supply chain for publicly available
telecoms services.
2.23 The Director
does not wish to provide any further clarification of a general nature.
Where disputes arise which are investigated by Oftel, the Director will
take a view based on the particular circumstances surrounding individual
cases and publish his findings by way of the Competition Bulletin, where
appropriate.
Other
issues raised in responses
Response
2.24 It was pointed
out that the porting of paging numbers is not required and that the
obligation to provide portability in respect of personal numbers is
made more explicit.
Director’s
comments
2.25 The Director
considers that the position regarding paging and personal numbers is
made sufficiently clear in the preamble (see "Scope of Portability")
and in the Annexes to the Functional Specification.
Response
2.26 BT invited
Oftel to note that its costs and charges for portability in respect
of processes and arrangements for service providers may differ from
those costs and charges determined by the Director relating to inter-operator
charges.
Director’s
comments
2.27 The Director
notes BT’s comments.
Response
2.28 BT recognises
that where a customer has an existing out-of-area service with an operator,
provided the customer stays at the same address they have a right to
port. This is the only circumstance in which BT maintains that a mobility
check may not be necessary. Customers provided with "permanent" call
forwarding facilities should not, in BT’s view, be able to keep their
number and change address outside the donor service area.
Director’s
response
2.29 The Director
considers that this issue is embraced by his proposals relating to section
2, Recipient Operator’s Rules, rule 4. Therefore his position regarding
BT’s above-mentioned comments is as set out above in paragraph 2.14
to 2.16.
Response
2.30 Both BT and
Cable & Wireless maintained that the rules relating to the transfer
of number blocks covered in section 4, Common Rules, rules 1 and 2,
remain unlikely to be invoked in their current format. Whilst having
some applicability to circumstances where a recipient operator serves
all the customers with numbers in use in a given block (eg where a single
retail customer "owns" all the numbers in a block and wishes to switch
supplier), neither company could readily see a situation where a donor
would welcome a block transfer to a competitor whilst continuing to
serve some customers with numbers in use within the block, ie agreeing
to a reverse porting arrangement.
Director’s
comments
2.31 The Director
has recently published his consultation on proposals to change the framework
for number portability (14 June 2002). In that document, the Director
seeks views on proposals to put in place arrangements to transfer blocks
in circumstances where a company withdraws from the telecoms market.
The Director does not therefore consider it appropriate to make any
changes to the current Functional Specification rules until he has received
and considered the responses of stakeholders to the June 02 consultation.
He will, however, take the comments made by Cable & Wireless and
BT in response to this consultation into account when giving further
consideration to any changes to these rules.
Responses
2.32 BT suggests
that there have been operational problems with maintaining up to date
copies of the various process manuals on Oftel’s web-site. BT recognises
that these documents are the responsibility of industry and seeks to
have access to part of Oftel’s web-site where publishing is delegated
to the document owners.
Director’s
comments
2.33 Oftel is not
content to facilitate industry access to its web-site because this raises
security and liability concerns as well as logistical difficulties.
Oftel recognises that it is important that industry number portability
documents are kept up to date and are accessible. Oftel will work with
industry to improve on the current arrangements and endeavour to address
particular concerns. Alternatively, industry may wish to consider setting
up its own site so that its documentation may be maintained to its satisfaction
and controlled in a manner of its choosing.
Definitions
and wording
2.34 Several respondents
suggested changes to the definitions, annexes and wording of Oftel’s
draft Functional Specification. Such proposed amendments are generally
of a minor nature and too numerous to detail, on a point by point basis,
as to whether the Director accepts or rejects each suggestion. Where
the Director has rejected any proposed amendment, ie where it does not
appear in Issue number 4, and the party concerned wishes to know the
reason why, they are invited to contact Oftel directly.

Chapter
3
Summary
of changes to the draft revised number portability Functional Specification
3.1 This chapter summarises those non-material
changes which the Director has made, following consultation with interested
parties, to the draft revised number portability Functional Specification,
which he published at Annex A to his consultation document Revisions
to the Number Portability Functional Specification in June 2001.
Purpose of this document
3.2 The Director has revised this section
to clarify that the Functional Specification rules apply to fixed and
mobile licensees with a number portability or mobile number portability
condition. The rules also apply to Systemless Service Providers by virtue
of the Number Portability Regulations.
Scope of Portability
3.3 The Director has made minor amendments
reflecting changes to the references to the National Numbering Conventions.
With regard to mobile number ranges, the Director has deleted the references
to porting between analogue and digital networks. Analogue networks
have now closed. The Director has also amended the final paragraph referring
to the class licences. References to dates have been removed given the
frequency with which such licences are revoked and reissued.
Definitions
3.4 The Director has added a definition
clarifying references to the Number Portability Regulations. Again,
where appropriate, references to parts of the National Numbering Conventions
have been updated.
Section 1, Donor Operator’s Rules
Rule 4
3.5 The Director has accepted a proposed
amendment that enables Recipient Operator’s to use prefixes in a less
restricted way than rigid identification of the relevant switch in the
Recipient Operator’s network. Prefixes therefore may alternatively identify
a "network node".
Rule 7
3.6 The Director has amended the first
sentence to clarify that it is the Subscriber Number which is ported,
not the Subscriber.
Section 2, Recipient Operator’s Rules
Rule 3
3.7 The Director has made a minor change
to clarify that the Recipient Operator recognises the Number, not the
call, in cases where calls to ported numbers originate on the same local
switch as that to which the ported number is held.
Rule 4
3.8 For reasons set out in paragraphs 2.14
to 2.16 of this statement, the Director has decided to maintain rule
4 of the Functional Specification, Issue no 3 of 30 June 1998, for the
time being.
Section 4, Common Rules
Rule 3
3.9 The Director has deleted "electric"
CLI and replaced it with the term "network" so that the terminology
reflects that used in current CLI codes of practice. The reference to
the European Directive has been deleted as this has now been implemented.
Rule 5 (a)
3.10 The Director has clarified this rule
to make clear the circumstances where a Donor Operator may re-allocate
numbers which have previously been ported.
Rule 10
3.11 The Director has inserted "and/or"
instead of "or" to further clarify that porting may occur between any
combination of Operators and Service Providers.
Annexes A and B
3.12 The Director has deleted non-conformant
number ranges and referred, where possible, to those numbers in sub-ranges
of Number Ranges specified in the National Numbering Conventions.

Annex
A
Number portability
functional specification
Issue No: 4 - GEOGRAPHIC, NON-GEOGRAPHIC AND
MOBILE PORTABILITY
12 September
2002
Contents
- Purpose of this
document
- Scope of Portability
- Definitions
Rules of the Functional
Specification
SECTION
1: Donor
Operator’s Rules
SECTION
2: Recipient Operator’s Rules
SECTION
3: Transit Operator’s Rules
SECTION
4: Common Rules
Purpose of this
document
Operator or Service
Provider Portability is a facility that ultimately allows subscribers
to change the telecommunications company providing service while keeping
their telephone number. Telecommunications Act licences and the free
standing implementing statutory Regulations of the Numbering Directive
(98/61/EC) set out that Portability and Mobile Portability should be
provided by one telecommunication Operator or Service Provider to another
in accordance with the Functional Specification.
The Functional Specification
sets out: (i) the technical and operational scope of the Portability
facility to be provided; (ii) specific rules relating to processes to
be carried out by telecommunications Operators and, as the case may
be, Systemless Service Providers, which are necessary to ensure the
efficient provision of Portability between providers of publicly available
telephone services; and (iii) some general rules and other principles
concerning the efficient use of Numbers where Portability services are
being provided.
The rules contained
in the Functional Specification apply both to relevant fixed network
operators and, to the extent they are capable of doing so, Systemless
Service Providers by virtue of a licence condition entitled "Number
Portability" inserted into certain licences granted under section 7
of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and regulation 8 of the Telecommunications
(Interconnection) (Number Portability, etc.) Regulations 1999, S.I.
1999 No 3449 (the "Number Portability Regulations"), respectively. As
a result of the legal obligation on Systemless Service Providers to
provide any requested Portability on reasonable terms and in accordance
with the Functional Specification, it is likely that such Providers
will request Portability, under the relevant license condition, from
their underlying network operator and enter into contractual arrangements
with licensed operators in order to comply with these Rules. The Functional
Specification rules also apply to mobile operators by virtue of a licence
condition entitled "Mobile Number Portability" inserted into certain
licences granted under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984.
Scope of Portability
In January 2000,
Oftel implemented the number portability provisions of the Numbering
Directive (98/61/EC) by virtue of the provisions in the Number Portability
Regulations. This revision of the Functional Specification reflects
the changes brought about by the Numbering Directive and other changes
considered necessary.
The Number Portability
licence condition and the Number Portability Regulations require that
Subscribers should be able, if they wish, to keep their telephone numbers
when they change the Operator or Service Provider providing their fixed
telecommunications services.
In order to allow
Subscribers to retain their telephone number when they change the Operator
or Service Provider supplying services, numbers in the Geographic Number
Ranges (currently described in the Numbering Conventions Part A3) and
Non Geographic Number Ranges (currently described in the Numbering Conventions
Parts A5 - A7) are required to be portable. The Number Portability Regulations
do not cover portability for mobile and paging number ranges (these
number ranges are currently set out in the Numbering Conventions Part
A5). The requirement to provide a Portability facility to other mobile
operators in respect of mobile number ranges is set out in licences
granted under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 to mobile
public telecommunication operators.
A summary of non
geographic numbers from the Non Geographic Number Range that are required
to be portable can be found at Annex A.
Annex B sets out
those mobile number ranges that are required to be portable.
The lists of number
ranges or categories set out in the Annexes may be updated from time
to time by means of information notes published by Oftel in the Numbering
Bulletin. The updates will be consolidated each time a new Issue of
the Functional Specification is published.
This fourth issue
of the Functional Specification relates to Geographic Portability, Non-Geographic
Number Portability, Mobile Portability and Portability in general (such
as in the case of portability requirements under, for instance, regulation
8 of the Number Portability Regulations and the class licences granted
under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 to run branch systems
to provide telecommunications services and to provide international
simple voice resale services, commonly referred to as the TSL and ISVR,
respectively).
Further issues of
the Functional Specification will deal with any other changes to its
existing Rules that may become necessary.
Definitions
Donor Operator
The
Operator or Service Provider whose Subscriber Number(s) are in the process
of being, or have been passed or ported to a Recipient Operator.
E.164
Recommendation E.164
is the International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU-T’s) Recommendation
addressing the Numbering Plan for the ISDN era.
Geographic Mobility
A service offered
by an Operator (or, as the case may be, a Service Provider) to its Subscribers
whereby the calls to a Subscriber Number are routed to a new address.
Non
Geographic Number Range
A number range from
the Specified Numbering Scheme relating to Numbers other than those
in the Geographic Number Range and excepting numbers allocated for Mobile
Radio Telecommunications Services and Radiopaging Services.
Number Portability
Regulations
An abbreviation of The
Telecommunications (Interconnection)(Number Portability, etc.) Regulations
1999, S.I. 1999 No 3449.
Operator
Any person authorised to
provide telecommunications services not being prohibited from receiving
any financial benefit from their provision, and obliged by virtue of
provisions in the Licence authorising the provision of such services
to adopt a Numbering Plan for such Numbers as may have been allocated
by the Director to that person in accordance with the National Numbering
Conventions.
Parallel Running
A facility provided
by an Operator when any Numbering Range is in the process of being changed
and in order to assist users of the network to adjust to such a change,
a caller may for a limited period of time dial a Number which has been
superceded by another Number and still be connected to the called party.
Ported Number
A Subscriber Number
in relation to which the facility of Portability is in the process of
being or has been provided.
Personal Numbers
Numbers as defined in the
National Numbering Conventions (currently in Part A5).
Recipient Operator
The Operator or
Service Provider to whom Subscriber Number(s) are in the process of
being, or have been passed or ported from a Donor Operator.
SCCP
The signalling connection
control part (SCCP) provides, in signalling system No.7, additional
features to transfer circuit related, non-circuit related signalling
information, and other types of information between exchanges and specialised
centres in telecommunications networks.
Service Area (applies
to Geographic Portability only)
That part of the
licensed area of a Donor Operator within which, at the time that any
request for Simultaneous or Subsequent Geographic Mobility is made by
another operator in respect of a Customer Number, the Donor Operator
would provide such Geographic Mobility in respect of that Subscriber
Number as part of its standard provisioning practice. For the
avoidance of doubt, the Service Area does not mean any larger area other
than that defined by reference to such Geographic Number Ranges serving
a particular exchange or area code under the Specified Numbering Scheme.
Service Number
A Number from within
the Numbering Ranges designated in the National Numbering Conventions
for mobile services which is used as an internal number for the provision
of messaging or similar value-added services.
Service Provider
Any person who is
in the business of providing telecommunications services of any description.
Simultaneous Geographic
Mobility
A service offered
on a voluntary basis by a Recipient Operator to its Subscribers whereby
Subscriber Numbers may be retained while simultaneously changing Operator
(or, as the case may be, Service Provider) and moving to a new address.
Specially Tariffed Services
A full list of Specially Tariffed Services
and Personal Numbers is set out in Annex A.
Freephone: as defined
in National Numbering Conventions (currently in Part A6).
Local Rate: as defined
in National Numbering Conventions (currently in Part A6).
National Rate: as
defined in National Numbering Conventions (currently in Part A6).
Premium Rate: as
defined in National Numbering Conventions (currently in Part A7).
Subscriber
Any natural or legal
person who or which is party to a contract with a provider of publicly
available telecommunication services for the supply of such services.
Subscriber Number
The Number (or Numbers)
which any Operator’s (or, as the case may be, Service Provider’s) telecommunication
system recognises as relating to a particular Subscriber of that Operator
(or, as the case may be, of a Service Provider).
Subsequent Geographic Mobility
A service offered
on a voluntary basis by a Recipient Operator to its Subscribers whereby,
if a Subscriber Number becomes a Ported Number, it may be retained if
the Subscriber subsequently moves to a new address.
Subsequent Portability
A type of Portability
where the Donor Operator retrieves a Subscriber Number from a Recipient
Operator to whom that Number has been previously ported and ports it
to a second Recipient Operator.
Systemless Service Provider
A person who provides publicly available
telecommunication services but who does not run a telecommunications
system within the meaning of section 4 of the Telecommunications Act
1984 by means of which such services are provided.
Transit Operator
An Operator providing,
by agreement, interconnection between a Donor Operator and a Recipient
Operator via Points of Connection with both Operators.
Other definitions
Other definitions,
which have not been ascribed a meaning above, used in this Functional
Specification shall have the meanings ascribed to them in any Operator’s
licence granted under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 or
in that Act itself, as appropriate.
Rules of the
functional specification
Section
1: Donor operator's rules
It is a Donor Operator’s
responsibility to ensure that all calls destined for Ported Numbers,
subject to any network management actions reasonably undertaken in order
to maintain network integrity and, in response to abnormal demands,
are dealt with in a manner conforming to the following rules:
Rule 1
Calls to a Ported
Number, whether originating on the Donor Operator’s network or received
from other networks, are passed to the Recipient Operator over one or
more Points of Connection as agreed between the Donor and Recipient
Operators, unless there is no direct interconnection between them, in
which case the Donor Operator shall ensure that calls to the Ported
Number are passed to the Recipient Operator by means of a Transit Operator.
Rule 2
If the Donor Operator’s
ability to provide Portability in respect of new Subscriber Numbers,
in accordance with the Number Portability Regulations, becomes restricted
due to unforeseen constraints on switching or processing capacity, the
Donor Operator shall promptly notify relevant Recipient Operators and
Oftel.
Rule 3
To the extent that
Parallel Running of any groups of numbers is permitted by the National
Numbering Conventions, the Donor Operator shall be able to recognise
a ported Subscriber on the basis of receiving a call for the ported
Subscriber based on his original and new numbers.
Rules relating specifically to Geographic
and Non-Geographic Portability
Rule 4
Subject to Rule
5, before handing over each call to a Ported Number in a Recipient Operator’s
network, the Donor Operator shall ensure that a six-digit prefix commencing
with the number 5 (‘5xxxxx’), allocated for the purpose by the Oftel
Numbering Unit to the Recipient Operator, and providing the identity
of the Recipient Operator and, in the case of Geographic Portability,
the relevant switch or network node in the Recipient Operator’s network,
is inserted before the full national number.
Rule 5
Oftel Numbering
Unit will allocate prefixes commencing with numbers between 504000 to
505999 for use solely in connection with Non-Geographic Portability.
Within that block, prefixes commencing 5049 shall not be passed across
Points of Connection, being reserved for internal network use by all
Operators in connection with Non-Geographic Portability.
Rule 6
Subject to Rule
5, prefixes commencing with the number 5 shall be used in relation
to Portability by the Donor Operator, and for no purpose other than
to identify the Recipient Operator and, in the case of Geographic Portability,
the relevant switch in its network.
Rules relating specifically
to Mobile Portability:
Rule 7
The Donor Operator
shall, on receipt of a call for a ported Subscriber Number, either:
- relay a signalling
enquiry message to the recipient network, with an SCCP re-routing code
in the International E.164 format +44799x abcdefghi.
For signalling messages
in respect of circuit-related calls, this enables the Recipient Operator
to provide onward routing instructions back to the Donor Operator’s
network in:
- either standard
Mobile Subscriber Roaming Number E.164 International format sufficient
to identify the called party within the recipient network
- or in the form
of an Intermediate Routing Number (IRN) either in E.164 International
format +44799x abc defghi or, in E.164 National format 799x abc defghi,
to route the call into the recipient network, and allow the donor operator
to forward the call appropriately.
For
non-circuit related signalling messages, the Recipient Operator responds
to the Donor Operator according to standard GSM procedures.
- or, for circuit-related
calls, directly provide, as an option, on notification to the Recipient
Operator’s network, its own routing instructions to enable direction
of such calls to the Recipient Operator’s network and identification
of the ported Subscriber using an IRN, without relaying an enquiry to
the Recipient Operator’s network.
In the above, x is a digit identifying
the Recipient Operator’s network; abc defghi represent called Subscriber
number digits.
Section
2: Recipient operator's rules
It is a Recipient Operator’s
responsibility to ensure that all calls made to Ported Numbers, subject
to any network management actions reasonably undertaken in order to
maintain network integrity and, in response to abnormal demands, are
correctly delivered once they are correctly received from the Donor
Operator, and in particular the following rules apply:
Rule 1
In the absence of
call forwarding, application of the basic porting process shall not
result in the looping of calls through any set of nodes between public
network operator’s networks.
Rule 2
The Recipient Operator
shall inform the Donor Operator of any change in the circumstances of
the service associated with any Ported Number that may impact the Donor
Operator’s ability to route calls to that Ported Number. (This includes,
inter alia, in the case of Geographic Portability, transfer of Numbers
to another exchange in the Recipient Operator’s network, change in the
size of circuit group for transferred PBX and Centrex Subscribers, and
Subsequent Geographic Mobility, and, in the case of Non-Geographic Portability,
significant changes in call traffic volumes expected to be generated.)
Rules relating specifically
to Geographic Portability:
Rule 3
Where a call to
a Ported Number originates on the same local exchange as that on which
the Ported Number is held, the Recipient Operator shall recognise the
Number and route that call and terminate it within its telecommunication
system, unless the Donor Operator has agreed that the call may be passed
back to the Donor Operator via a Point of Connection for recognition
and re-routing.
Rule 4
A Recipient Operator
shall only provide Simultaneous or Subsequent Geographic Mobility to
a Subscriber in respect of a Subscriber Number ported from a Donor Operator
within the Service Area of the Donor Operator.
Rules relating specifically
to Non-Geographic and Mobile Portability:
Rule 5
Where a call to a ported non-geographic or mobile number
originates on the same network as that on which the Ported Number is
held, the Recipient Operator may recognise that call and route and terminate
it within its telecommunication system, but in the absence of such an
arrangement the call shall be passed to the Donor Operator via a Point
of Connection for recognition and re-routing.
Rules relating specifically to Mobile
Portability:
Rule 6
On receipt of an
SCCP enquiry message relating to a circuit related call from a Donor
Operator indicating that the Donor Operator has a call for a Ported
Number, the Recipient Operator shall provide onward routing instructions
back to the Donor Operator’s network:
- in either standard
Mobile Subscriber Roaming Number E.164 International format sufficient
to identify the called party within the Recipient Operator’s network;
or
- in the form of
an Intermediate Routing Number (IRN) either in E.164 International format
+44799x abc defghi or, in E.164 National format 799x abc defghi, to
enable the Donor Operator to route the call into the Recipient Operator’s
network. Digits after the Mobile Number Portability prefix (+44799x)
may be manipulated by the Recipient Operator’s network to include additional
routing information within the IRN.
For non-circuit
related signalling messages, the Recipient Operator responds to the
Donor Operator according to standard GSM procedures.
Section 3: Transit
operator's rules
Rules
relating specifically to Geographic and Non-geographic Portability:
Rule 1
A Transit Operator
shall, when a call is received over a Point of Connection from a Donor
Operator with the distinguishing 6 digit prefix 5xxxxx inserted before
the full national Number, deliver the call to the appropriate Point
of Connection of the Recipient Operator with the 6-digit prefix intact.
Rules relating specifically
to Mobile Number Portability:
Rule 2
An Operator providing
SCCP transit functionality between the Donor and Recipient Operator’s
networks shall support relay of a signalling enquiry message to the
Recipient Operator’s network, with an SCCP re-routing code in the International
E.164 format +44799x abc defghi.
Transit Operators’
networks providing call routing between qualifying networks shall support
the routing of IRNs either in the E.164 International format +44799x
abc defghi or, in the E.164 National format 799x abc defghi.
Section 4: Common
rules
Rule
1
10,000
Number Blocks (not applicable to Mobile Number Portability)
Where an entire
block of 10,000 Subscriber Numbers is transferred from a Donor Operator
to a Recipient Operator, the Donor Operator shall notify the Oftel Numbering
Scheme Manager to this effect. Such blocks shall be transferred using
the same technical method - amendments to the routing tables of switches
on the Donor (and all other) Operator’s systems - as would be used if
a new 10,000 number block had been opened up by the Recipient Operator,
and by this means all calls to numbers in that block will be automatically
routed to their correct location. For the avoidance of doubt, the six
digit-prefix commencing with the number 5 shall not need to be used
to route calls to a number block that has been transferred in this way.
Rule 2
Number Block Ownership
(not applicable to Mobile Number Portability)
(a) Having regard
to the National Numbering Conventions, where a Donor Operator loses
60% or more of its Subscriber Numbers to any Recipient Operators, and
at least 40% of those Subscriber Numbers are handled by one Recipient
Operator, the Donor Operator (or that Recipient Operator) may apply
to Oftel’s Numbering Scheme Manager for re-allocation of that block
to that Recipient Operator.
(b) Oftel will retain
absolute discretion as to whether to re-allocate such numbers in these
circumstances. However, the following factors will be taken into account
when reaching a decision:
(i) there should
be no adverse effect upon network services or facilities available
to remaining Subscribers of the Donor Operator once the re-allocation
takes place;
(ii) there shall
be proper arrangements in place between all affected Operators in
order to co-ordinate consequent changes of primary routing of the
re-allocated range of numbers and alteration of transfer arrangements
in relation to those numbers;
(iii) having regard
to the National Numbering Conventions, if the Donor Operator regains
60% or more of the Subscriber Numbers in a transferred number block,
it may apply to Oftel’s Numbering Scheme Manager for a further re-allocation
of the transferred block back to itself, and the considerations set
out under Rule 2 shall apply; and
(iv) where a number
block held by a Donor Operator is reallocated in accordance with the
rules set out above, the Donor Operator may apply to Oftel’s Numbering
Scheme Manager for a new number block to be allocated in accordance
with the National Numbering Conventions.
Rule
3
CLI
Procedures
The originating caller’s network or
presentation CLI settings shall be maintained by any operator handling
a call to a Ported Number wherever possible, or set to ‘number unavailable’
if not. The status of presentation restriction shall be maintained according
to the relevant codes of practice.
Rule 4
Call Routing
All calls to Ported Numbers, including calls handled
by Transit Operators, shall use routing which minimises call set-up
delay, commensurate with the technical capabilities of the systems and
having regard to the implementation costs.
Rule 5
Number Allocation and Conservation
In addition to their
general obligations as set out in the National Numbering Conventions,
all operators shall share responsibility for ensuring that the provision
of Portability does not jeopardise the proper administration of the
Specified Numbering Scheme. The following rules therefore apply:
(a) The Donor Operator
shall maintain a list of Ported Numbers with a view to ensuring that
it makes no attempt to reallocate any such number unless it is given
up by the ported Subscriber. The Recipient Operator shall inform
the Donor Operator when a Subscriber has given up a Ported Number. For
the avoidance of doubt, the Donor Operator may reallocate any such number
after having being informed by the Recipient Operator that a Subscriber
has given up a Ported Number.
(b) In addition
to the requirements placed upon them by the National Numbering Conventions
to maintain a record of the percentage use of their numbering allocation,
Donor Operators shall at intervals agreed with Oftel, notify Oftel’s
Numbering Scheme Manager of the quantity of Ported Numbers in each allocated
block in their networks.
Rule 6
Subsequent Portability
With the aim of
ensuring that service to the Subscriber using the Number is provided
with as little disruption as possible, the Recipient Operators shall
co-operate with each other in ensuring that any Recipient Operator
who wins the Subscriber’s business at that Number from another Recipient
Operator is informed of the identity of the Donor Operator, and the
Donor Operator shall co-operate with both Recipient Operators in establishing
arrangements for Portability to be provided.
Rule 7
Migration of Number Length
Where a Donor Operator
intends to substitute Numbers with more digits than those in the same
block as any Ported Number or provide parallel running associated with
such numbers, the Donor Operator shall give the Recipient Operator sufficient
advance notice of the approximate date of the planned substitution or
introduction of parallel running to enable the Recipient Operator to
make appropriate technical arrangements to ensure a smooth handover.
Generally, the Donor Operator should be able to provide three months’
advance notice of the exact date of substitution or introduction of
parallel running, subject to any practical difficulties which may affect
that date by a reasonable period of time. The Donor Operator shall provide
to the Recipient Operator the longer Number which corresponds to that
Ported Number. The Recipient Operator shall ensure that, concurrent
with the Donor Operator’s substitution of the longer Number block for
the shorter Number block, the Ported Number is also substituted.
Rule 8
Specially Tariffed
Numbers
- Portability shall not result in any
change in the category of Specially Tariffed Service being offered
to the calling party. The categories of Specially Tariffed Services
are listed in the definition of Specially Tariffed Services and the
corresponding number ranges are set out in Annex
A. Where any Specially Tariffed Service
is divided into sub-categories delineated by number prefixes within
the range allocated to a particular type of Specially Tariffed Service,
Portability shall not result in any change in the relevant sub-category
offered to the calling party.
- Where the calling party is a Subscriber
of the Operator (or, as the case may be, a Service Provider) to whom
any Number for Specially Tariffed Services has been ported, the tariff
paid by calling party should not significantly increase or decrease
as a result of the porting of any Subscriber Number which is a Number
for Specially Tariffed Services.
Rule 9
Premium Rate Service
Numbers
Under no circumstances
should service providers be allowed to port premium rate service numbers
merely to by-pass the Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards
of Telephone Information Services (ICSTIS) Code(s) of Practice.
Rule 10
Service Providers
Timely Porting
Where an Operator
has directly sub-allocated any Numbers to any Systemless Service Provider,
it shall ensure that those Numbers remain capable of being ported in
a timely manner between Operators and/or Service Providers. Mobile operators
shall ensure that, where they provide mobile services by means of a
Service Provider, any Number they sub-allocate to the Service Provider
remains capable of being ported.
Where a Portability
facility is already in place, the provision of Number Portability to
Subscribers should not significantly add to the time it would normally
take to provide a service where Number Portability is not involved irrespective
of the number of Service Providers involved. Any Service Provider or
Operator receiving a legitimate request to port a Number shall port
the Number in a timely manner.
Rule 11
Process Manuals
The agreed text
of any process manual relating to the provision of Portability can be
found on Oftel’s Web site (www.oftel.gov.uk - under the number portability
section of numbering information). It is the responsibility of the industry
group producing the manual to ensure that any updates of the manual
and any related forms are forwarded to Oftel in order to ensure that
the latest version is available.
Annex A:
Numbering Ranges
for Specially Tariffed Services and Personal Numbers
1.
Freephone
Numbers beginning:
0500
Numbers in the sub-ranges of the 080 number range allocated for use
with any services consistent with the Numbering Conventions (currently
Part A6).
2.
Local Rate
Numbers in the sub-ranges
of the 084 number range allocated for use with any services consistent
with the Numbering Conventions (currently Part A6).
4.
National Rate
Numbers in the sub-ranges
of the 087 number range allocated for use with any services consistent
with the Numbering Conventions (currently Part A6).
5.
Other
Numbers beginning
082 Internet for
schools
6.
Premium Rate
Numbers
in sub-ranges of the 090 and 091 number ranges allocated for use with
any services consistent with the Numbering Conventions (currently Part
A7).
7.
Personal Numbers
Numbers
in sub-ranges of the 070 number range allocated for use with any services
consistent with the Numbering Conventions (currently Part A5). Personal
Numbers are not Specially Tariffed Services.
Annex
B:
Numbering Ranges
–for Mobile Services
Mobile Services
in the 07 numbering ranges (excluding Service Numbers)
Numbers beginning:
077
078
079

Annex B
B.1 The consultative
document on revisions to the number portability Functional Specification
was published in June 2001 and responses requested by 14 September 2001.
Responses were received from:
1 Scottish Advisory
Committee on Telecommunications
2 ntl Group Limited
3 Vodafone Limited
4 Colt Telecommunications
5 British Telecommunications
plc
6 Telewest Communications
7 Energis plc
8 Cable & Wireless
plc
|