Layout image
   
Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Draft direction under Regulation 6(6) of the Telecommunications (Interconnection) Regulations 1997 relating to a dispute between British Telecommunications plc ("BT") and the operators listed in the Schedule over BT's Transit Risk Review Supplemental Agreement - 31 October 2002 Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image

Contents

The draft direction

Schedule Operators in dispute with BT

Explanatory Memorandum

Chapter 1 Summary

Chapter 2 Background

Chapter 3 History of the dispute

Chapter 4 Submissions of the parties

Chapter 5 The Director General’s considerations

Chapter 6 Consultation and timetable for responses

Annex Operators which made submissions to the Director


DRAFT DIRECTION UNDER REGULATION 6(6) OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCONNECTION REGULATIONS 1997 RELATING TO A DISPUTE BETWEEN BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC ("BT") AND THE OPERATORS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE OVER BT’S TRANSIT RISK REVIEW SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

Whereas:

(A) The Secretary of State granted to British Telecommunications on 22 June 1984 a licence (the "BT licence") under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 ("the Act") for the running of telecommunications systems specified in that licence;

(B) By virtue of section 109 of, and paragraph 20 to, Schedule 5 of the Act the BT licence has effect as if granted to British Telecommunications plc ("BT");

(C) The Secretary of State has granted to each of the operators listed in the Schedule a licence under section 7 of the Act for the running of telecommunications systems specified in that licence;

(D) The operators listed in the Schedule entered into a Standard Interconnect Agreement ("SIA") with BT on the dates set out in the Schedule;

(E) The SIA allows either party to seek to amend the SIA by serving on the other a review notice in certain circumstances. On service of a review notice, the SIA requires that the parties negotiate in good faith the matters to be resolved with a view to agreeing relevant amendments to the SIA. Where the parties fail to reach agreement on the subject matter of a review notice within a period set out in the SIA, either party may, within a period set out in the SIA, request the Director to determine the matters upon which the parties have failed to agree;

(F) On 18 December 2001, BT served a review notice ("the Review Notice") on the operators listed in the Schedule. The Review Notice sought amendments to the SIA to introduce reciprocal provisions covering certain bad debt risks in a transit situation;

(G) For the purposes of the Review Notice, the SIA allows for a three month period of negotiation, followed by a three month period within which either party may make a request to the Director to determine any matters upon which the parties have failed to agree;

(H) On 15 April 2002, and following negotiation between the parties which did not result in agreement on the Review Notice, BT sent a proposed supplemental agreement to the SIA signed by BT ("the Supplemental Agreement") to the operators listed in the Schedule. The Supplemental Agreement incorporated BT’s proposals as set out in the Review Notice. BT sought the return of a copy of the Supplemental Agreement, signed and dated by the operators listed in the Schedule, by 7 May 2002;

(I) On 13 May 2002, BT wrote to the operators listed in the Schedule seeking the return of a copy of the Supplemental Agreement, signed and dated by those operators, by 20 May 2002. In that letter, BT stated that any operator which had either

(i) indicated their intention not to sign the Supplemental Agreement, or

(ii) not returned a signed and dated copy of the Supplemental Agreement to BT by 20 May 2002,

would be assumed to be in dispute with BT in relation to the Supplemental Agreement;

(J) As at 20 May 2002, the operators listed in the Schedule had either:

(i) indicated their intention not to sign the Supplemental Agreement, or

(ii) not returned a signed and dated copy of the Supplemental Agreement to BT,

and therefore a dispute has arisen;

(K) On 24 May 2002, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 6(6) of the Telecommunications (Interconnection) Regulations 1997 ("the Regulations"), BT referred the dispute to the Director for determination;

(L) Regulation 6(6) of the Regulations provides that where there is a dispute concerning interconnection between organisations, the Director General of Telecommunications ("the Director") shall, at the request of either party, take steps to resolve the dispute within six months of the date of the request. The direction which the Director makes to resolve the dispute must represent a fair balance between the legitimate interests of the parties, and must be notified to the parties in accordance with Regulation 8(3). The parties are entitled to a full statement of the reasons on which the direction is based;

(M) The Director has considered, inter alia, the information provided by the parties and the matters set out in Regulation 6(8) of the Regulations. The principal points are summarised in the explanatory memorandum which accompanies, and is published with, this direction;

(N) The Regulations place upon the Director the general responsibility to encourage and secure adequate interconnection in the interests of all users;

(O) The Director issued a draft of this direction and the explanatory memorandum which contained the Director’s reasons on 31 October 2002 and responses were invited by 28 November 2002;

(P) Non-confidential comments were received from [xx] as detailed and discussed in Chapter [x] of the explanatory memorandum which accompanies and is published with this direction. The Director in making this direction has taken these comments into account; 

THEREFORE:

Pursuant to Regulation 6(6) of the Regulations, and having considered, inter alia, the views of the parties and those matters set out in Regulation 6(8) of the Regulations, the Director makes the following direction to resolve the dispute between BT and the operators listed in the Schedule:

1. The operators listed in the Schedule shall not be required to sign the Supplemental Agreement nor agree to BT’s proposals for amendment to the SIA set out in the Review Notice.

2. Except as otherwise defined in this direction, words or expressions used shall have the same meaning as in the Act, the BT licence or BT’s Standard Interconnect Agreement as appropriate.

3. This direction shall take effect on the day it is published.

 

Heather Julie Clayton

Director of Investigations

A person authorised under Paragraph 8 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1984

………. 2002

back to contents


Schedule – Operators in dispute with BT

 

Operator

Agreement Date

186K Ltd

June 27, 2001

4D Telecom Limited

July 20, 1998

Allied Communications (UK) Ltd

August 18, 2000

Alpha Telecom (UK) Ltd

August 11, 1999

America First Ltd

October 19, 1998

AUCS Communications Services (UK) Ltd

November 25, 1999

Band-X Managed Services plc

September 12, 2001

Bis Ltd

October 6, 2001

Broadsystem Ventures Ltd

May 24, 1999

BT Cellnet Ltd

May 24, 1996

Cable & Wireless Communications (Mercury)

September 23, 1997

Call Sciences Ltd

June 13, 1997

Carrier 1 UK Ltd

August 17, 1998

Cellcom Ltd

December 4, 1997

Cheers International Telecom Ltd

October 3, 2001

Colloquium Ltd

February 7, 2002

COLT Telecommunications

July 24, 1996

Communications 2000 Group plc

August 14, 2000

Communications Networking Services (UK)

January 5, 2000

Core Telecommunications Ltd

February 11, 1998

Darose Ltd

December 21, 1999

Dolphin Telecommunications Ltd

May 11, 1998

Easynet Group PLC

December 18, 1997

Ecosse Telecommunications Ltd

November 11, 1998

Edinburgh Network Technologies Ltd

December 20, 1999

EESCAPE Limited

August 16, 1999

Eircom NI Limited

July 12, 1999

Energis Carrier Services UK Ltd

December 4, 1997

Energis Communications Ltd

June 20, 1997

E-Tel Ventures plc

January 21, 2002

Eurocall Ltd

September 27, 1996

First Telecom PLC

April 22, 1998

GKC Communications Ltd

April 23, 2001

Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Ltd

August 31, 1995

Global Crossing Communications International Ltd

June 27, 1997

Global Electroteks Ltd

April 30, 2001

Hutchison 3G UK Ltd

August 13, 2001

IDT Global Limited

April 21, 1999

IMS Telecom Ltd

March 9, 2001

INMS UK LTD

December 23, 1999

Intelnet Communications Limited

February 16, 1999

International Telecom plc

July 31, 2000

Interoute Telecommunications (UK) Ltd

July 10, 1997

Interweb Design Limited

April 6, 2000

Iomart Limited

March 29, 1999

Ipsaris Ltd

May 8, 2001

Isle of Wight Cable & Telephone Company Ltd

October 30, 2000

iXnet UK Ltd

December 20, 1996

Keycom plc

September 9, 2000

Kingston Communications (Hull) PLC

December 17, 1998

Level 3 Communications Limited

March 24, 2000

Libertysurf Communications Ltd

July 6, 1998

Long Distance International Ltd

September 10, 1997

Manet Telecom Ltd

April 26, 2001

MCI WorldCom Ltd

February 20, 1997

MediaWays.UK Ltd

January 9, 2001

NetKonect Communications Ltd

March 8, 1999

Nevada Tele.Com Limited

January 24, 2000

North American Gateway Ltd

July 22, 1999

OMNE Communications Ltd

June 26, 2001

One 2 One Personal Communications Limited

June 17, 1996

Opal Telecommunications PLC

December 17, 1996

Opera Telecom Ltd

February 16, 2000

Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd

December 13, 1996

Pacific Gateway Exchange (UK) Ltd

June 30, 1998

PageOne Communications Ltd

January 26, 2000

Patientline UK Limited

April 18, 2000

PNC TELECOM plc

August 3, 2000

Powernet Telecom plc

June 2, 1999

Premier Communications International Ltd

April 26, 2001

Primus Telecommunications Ltd

January 7, 1997

Prodigy Internet Ltd

September 12, 2001

Rateflame Limited

June 25, 1999

Reach Europe Ltd

March 27, 1997

Redstone Communications Ltd

May 22, 1996

Skymaker Limited

December 9, 1998

Star Telecommunications Inc

January 15, 1998

Starcomm Limited

November 2, 1999

Startec Global Communications UK Limited

September 15, 1999

Storm Telecommunications Ltd

May 18, 1999

Stratos Global Ltd

January 5, 2001

Swiftnet Ltd

August 8, 2000

Syntec UK Limited

February 5, 1999

T3 Telecommunications Limited

June 25, 1999

Telco Network Services Ltd

March 13, 1997

Tele 2 Communications Services Limited

March 30, 1999

Telecentric Solutions Ltd

February 29, 1996

Telecom Art Limited

April 20, 1999

Telecom GB Ltd

September 19, 2000

Telecom One Ltd

May 12, 1998

Teleglobe International (UK) Ltd

January 13, 1997

Telegroup UK Ltd

December 4, 1997

TGC UK Ltd.

July 18, 2000

The Phone Company Ltd

June 30, 1997

Thus plc

August 16, 1996

Tiscali UK Ltd

January 13, 1997

Torc Europe Ltd

May 17, 2000

Torch Communications Ltd

February 26, 1997

Totem Communications Ltd

October 5, 1998

UKBELL plc

December 10, 2001

Unica Communications Ltd

February 1, 2001

Unitel Communications Limited

February 1, 1999

Vartec Telecom (U.K.) Limited

October 21, 1998

VBCnet (GB) Ltd

August 15, 1999

Ventelo UK Ltd

April 28, 1995

Via-Fon Limited

April 23, 1999

Viatel Global Communications Ltd

April 28, 1995

Vodafone Ltd

May 10, 1996

World-Link, Inc

May 4, 2000

WXC London Limited

June 19, 1997

Your Communications Ltd

February 28, 1997

Zipcom Telecommunications Limited

October 10, 2000

Barnsley Cable Communications Ltd

September 11, 1996

Birmingham Cable Ltd

October 24, 1996

Cable Camden Ltd

September 30, 1996

Cable Enfield Ltd

September 30, 1996

Cable Hackney & Islington Ltd

September 30, 1996

Cable Haringey Ltd

September 30, 1996

Doncaster Cable Communications Ltd

September 11, 1996

Eurobell (South West) Ltd

June 28, 1996

Eurobell (Sussex) Ltd

June 28, 1996

Eurobell West Kent

July 21, 1997

Halifax Cable Communications Ltd

September 11, 1996

Imminus Ltd

October 2, 1996

Middlesex Cable Ltd

September 11, 1996

Sheffield Cable Communications Ltd

September 11, 1996

Telewest Communications (Central Lancashire) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Cotswolds) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Cumbernauld) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Dumbarton) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Dundee and Perth) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Dundee and Perth) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Falkirk) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Glenrothes) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Liverpool) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Liverpool) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (London South) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (London South) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (London South) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Midlands) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Motherwell) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (North East) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Scotland) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (South East) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (South Thames Estuary) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (South West) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (St Helens and Knowsley) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Telford) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications (Wigan) Ltd

September 26, 1996

Telewest Communications PLC

January 15, 1998

Wakefield Cable Communications Ltd

September 11, 1996

Windsor Television Ltd

September 11, 1996

Windsor Television Ltd

September 11, 1996

Yorkshire Cable Communications Ltd

September 11, 1996

Andover Cablevision Ltd

May 30, 1996

Anglia Cable Ltd

March 26, 1997

Cable Television Ltd

August 19, 1996

Cable Thames Valley Ltd

August 19, 1996

CableTel Cardiff Ltd

December 13, 1996

CableTel Central Hertfordshire Ltd

December 13, 1996

CableTel Hertfordshire Ltd

December 13, 1996

CableTel Herts and Beds Ltd

December 13, 1996

CableTel Newport

December 13, 1996

CableTel North Bedfordshire Ltd

December 13, 1996

CableTel Northern Ireland Ltd

April 15, 1996

CableTel Surrey and Hampshire Ltd

December 13, 1996

CableTel West Glamorgan Ltd

December 13, 1996

Comtel Coventry Ltd

September 29, 1997

Diamond Cable (GrimClee) Ltd

July 12, 1996

Diamond Cable (Leicester) Ltd

July 12, 1996

Diamond Cable (Lincoln) Ltd

July 12, 1996

Diamond Cable (Mansfield) Ltd

July 12, 1996

East Coast Cable Ltd

March 26, 1997

Heartland Cablevision UK Ltd

August 19, 1996

Herts Cable Ltd

August 19, 1996

Lichfield Cable Communications Ltd

March 25, 1997

National Transcommunications Ltd

December 22, 1997

NTL Cambridge Ltd

March 26, 1997

NTL Darlington Ltd

October 30, 1996

NTL Glasgow

December 13, 1996

NTL Glasgow

December 13, 1996

NTL Glasgow

December 13, 1996

NTL Glasgow

December 13, 1996

NTL Glasgow

December 13, 1996

NTL Group Ltd

November 21, 2000

NTL Kirklees

December 13, 1996

NTL Midlands Ltd

July 12, 1996

NTL Teesside Ltd

October 30, 1996

NTL Telecom Services Ltd

September 10, 1997

Oxford Cable Ltd

May 8, 1996

Stafford Communications Ltd

May 8, 1996

Swindon Cable Ltd

May 26, 1998

Wessex Cable Ltd

May 30, 1996

back to contents


Draft direction under Regulation 6(6) of the Telecommunications (Interconnection) Regulations 1997 relating to a dispute between British Telecommunications plc ("BT") and the operators listed in the Schedule over BT’s Transit Risk Review Supplemental Agreement

Explanatory Memorandum

Chapter 1

Summary