Layout image
   
Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Large business use of telecoms competition and services Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image

September 2000


Contents

Introduction

Method

Report

Summary

Main findings

Next steps

Appendix A - Pre-workshop questionnaire


1. Introduction

1.1 A workshop was held in September 2000 with the Oftel Large Business User Panel which comprises individuals responsible for purchasing telecoms services for large organisations in the public and private sectors.

1.2 The Panel was set up to promote awareness in large organisations of the opportunities available in the competitive marketplace and to expose Oftel policy makers and telecom companies to the concerns of large telecoms users. With this in mind, the aim of the workshop was to investigate large business views and use of competition and telecoms services.

1.3 In addition to Oftel using the information collected for policy decisions, market reviews and to test policy implementation, it is hoped that the results may also prove useful to large businesses in general and to telcos by providing feedback from large business customers.

contents


2. Method

2.1 A questionnaire was distributed among members of the Large Business User Panel prior to the workshop to establish areas of common interest for discussion at the workshop. This questionnaire can be found in Appendix A of this report. A total of eight members of the Panel completed the questionnaire and/or took part in the workshop.

contents


3. Report

3.1 The report records quotes from a workshop of the Large Business User Panel and from the questionnaire distributed beforehand. It was agreed that the identity of the authors of the quotes, and the operators to whom they refer, would not be identified. While the quotes have been carefully checked by OFTEL and with the members of the panel, they are not OFTEL's views, OFTEL accepts no liability in respect of the comments made.

3.2 The following topics are covered in the report:-

  • Competition, suppliers used and practicalities of switching
  • Comparing suppliers
  • Customer service/account management
  • Billing/tariffs
  • Use of Internet/e-commerce, e-mail
  • Broadband, advanced services, convergence
  • Use of mobiles

contents


4. Summary

4.1 The main findings are summarised below followed by a summary of quotes from the discussions.

Competition and suppliers used

4.2 Resilience was paramount for large businesses in their choice of telecoms supplier and they were reluctant to use suppliers without their own infrastructure. Several businesses complained of a lack of infrastructure competition in parts of the country.

4.3 Businesses felt that competition was not sufficiently established in several areas including mobile, local loop and leased lines.

4.4 There was a move among large businesses towards using fewer suppliers to limit management costs.

4.5 Factors which might discourage switching included number portability, and the technical and cost implications of switching.

4.6 Businesses were using word of mouth and networking to compare suppliers, in addition to benchmarking data.

4.7 Several businesses mentioned that suppliers were not fulfilling their promises due to lack of resources.

4.8 Some businesses felt that their suppliers were making no effort to regain their business and were less enthusiastic and responsive than other suppliers. However, others felt that their suppliers were well-suited to their organisations due to their experience, account management set-up and extra services such as provision of certain types of statistical information.

Billing/Tariffs

4.9 Large businesses were experiencing continuing problems with billing. Problems mentioned included accuracy, timeliness, complexity and disregard of billing instructions by telecoms suppliers. An Oftel/industry project on billing is already working to address these issues and information relating to billing problems collected during the workshop will be passed on to the project team.

Internet/e-commerce

4.10 Panel members varied in their use of the Internet/e-commerce from using it as a static source of information to advanced applications including extranets, and fully developed e-commerce.

4.11 On the whole, the benefits of the Internet/e-commerce were as yet unclear, several mentioning that they were simply keeping up with their competitors and saw their involvement in the Internet/e-commerce more as an investment for the future.

4.12 It was also mentioned that businesses’ move towards the Internet/e-commerce depended, not on technical issues, but rather on their ability to adapt to new methods of working, for example with e-procurement and staff acting without the need for authorisation.

Broadband

4.13 Panel members said they were prepared to pay for bandwidth, although the expense of broadband was also mentioned, including for consumers wanting to access companies’ websites.

Convergence

4.14 A number of Panel members were involved in projects examining the convergence of fixed, mobile and Internet services. These projects were addressing issues such as the cost implications and studying the best technology. Several Panel members were interested in VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol).

contents


5. Main Findings

5.1 Below is a summary of quotes from the discussions during the workshop together with comments from the questionnaires.  The topics covered are in the following order:-

Is competition sufficiently established in different telecoms markets/Are businesses encouraging suppliers to be competitive

5.2 The majority of businesses were putting their telecoms services out to tender and perceived themselves to be making savings, some under pressure to make savings.

‘We are not actively encouraging competition although generally speaking we do seek competitive tenders.’

‘We are actively pursuing putting services out to tender to gain a target of 35% savings, we aim to save £4m this financial year.’

‘On the technology side, we are under pressure to make savings so that the whole business can make profits. The company is always asking how much telecoms are going to cost. This is because there are two sides of the business – the business side which makes money and the technology side which is a cost and is under pressure to save money. There are the costs of trading in a heavily regulated environment which is expensive to users due to the cost of not having competitive supply – keeping prices high, and to the incumbent, being bound by discrimination licence conditions, charging higher tariffs for some services.’

5.3 Businesses were also taking advantage of discount schemes, although one said that they did not bother as their suppliers tended to have lower prices anyway.

5.4 In addition to savings, it was also mentioned that competition had led to improvements in other areas.

‘Complaints and ordering procedures are improving as competition starts to bite.’

5.5 However, businesses felt that competition was not sufficiently established in several areas including mobile, local loop and leased lines.

‘Mobile (GSM) services are not competitive (although the industry would have you think it is) and roaming charges are an anomaly – not based on costs and tariffing data is not made available to customers.’

‘Currently local loop and tail end leased lines are not competitive on routes outside major conurbations.’

‘I do not believe there is adequate choice and am interested in this topic specifically in the area of fixed (access) and mobile.’

5.6 Businesses were also making use of competition in the area of call centre services, although there was concern about being able to protect their brand when outsourcing these services.

‘We recognise that call centres are/will be a useful tool in our type of business. We are particularly looking for integrated supply from call centre suppliers – suppliers helping to set up and run a call centre in the early stages of development.’

‘Outsourcing is becoming common place but for some companies, quality of service and dealing directly with their customer base is paramount in protecting their brand. Telcos are offering call centre applications in their network, both internationally and at national level.’

Suppliers used/choice of suppliers

5.7 Businesses were using a range of suppliers, numbering from around 5 to 12 suppliers. Their choice of supplier was dictated by resilience which was paramount for large businesses. They were reluctant to use suppliers without their own infrastructure, were specifying separate routing of calls by their suppliers and were using copper rather than fibre.

5.8 As for actual problems with resilience, some businesses had encountered problems, however, it was also fear of problems that might be restricting use of competition, with one business mentioning that the possible financial savings did not merit the risk of telecoms problems, telecoms playing so vital a role in these businesses, and the telecoms budget comparatively trivial in the overall costs of the business. Penalties for telcos when problems occurred were considered trivial and therefore no help in guaranteeing resilience.

‘We are currently using multiple network operators on a global basis, in the US and in other markets. Many of our routes are in support of critical businesses therefore we use multiple operators to supply routing diversity for disaster recovery.’

‘We have a number of large sites which can be treated independently. We select suppliers for each site and have pipes put into each site, and a person is there locally who can sort out problems for each site. We are keen for Oftel to address the lack of competition in infrastructure in some parts of the country. A second universal infrastructure is needed. …The telecoms budget is trivial in the overall costs of the business and therefore we will pay for security, copper wires etc. For large business, the savings that could be made do not merit the risk of telecoms problems.’

‘Our business would collapse without telecoms. On all routes, we have three carriers as we need 99.9% resilience, and all calls are routed separately. Resilience is crucial and written into the contract. We need customers to be able to get in. We use virtual private networks to cut down on the cost of calls from abroad. The company cannot afford to lose business, we cannot find suppliers who will be liable for all scenarios, for example the exchange going down, and the company has to bear responsibility. The penalties to the telco are quite trivial.’

‘We have a similar situation and use at least three links from different exchanges.’

‘We need to find out how the routing is done otherwise traffic could end up on the same exchanges.’

‘We specify use of different pipes, for example undersea cables, we ensure we have a back-up pipe.’

5.9 Leading on from the importance of resilience, businesses complained of a lack of infrastructure competition in parts of the country.

‘In terms of communications, our business is introverted with local and national traffic only. Resilience is important and we only use PSTN traffic from suppliers providing infrastructure. We use three or four and keep these totally separate. We need to know how a supplier delivers its own traffic. There is a huge lack of competition in infrastructure. For example, whilst at one site there is a lot of competition, at another there is none with only one carrier. We use only the suppliers’ infrastructure otherwise there is no resilience and therefore no back-up.’

‘We rely on experience. If the suppliers screw up, we use our two other existing ones. This is not possible where there is a lack of infrastructure competition.’

‘We currently pay circa £12m in fixed line rentals and feel that there is little choice.’

5.10 Another constraint on which suppliers were used was management costs and as a result businesses were moving towards limiting the number of suppliers they used.

‘Some suppliers provide their own cable into buildings but this is very expensive and whilst possible in big cities like London and Birmingham is not viable elsewhere. Management overheads can wipe out savings from different vendors.’

‘There is a cost in using a number of suppliers – management overheads, billing etc - and therefore companies are trying to reduce the number of suppliers they use. We have offices all over the country. In the major sites, we can get other suppliers to provide pipes, elsewhere in smaller sites, there is no choice, no competition.’

5.11 Businesses were not using indirect access operators due to perceived lack of accountability. Businesses had concerns about lack of maintenance response and lack of resilience. Some businesses had experienced problems with operators ‘passing the buck’ in relation to faults and repairs.

‘There cannot be 100% confidence in resilience though it is more fear rather than actual problems that we have experienced.’

‘When there are faults and say indirect suppliers, no one is accountable for the faults.’

Practicalities of switching

5.12 No significant barriers emerged to the actual process of switching although businesses did have some concerns with technical issues including perceived difficulties with number portability, the cost implications of switching and the difficulty of having offices spread out around the country.

5.13 Rather than switching supplier some businesses were routing calls between the lines of existing suppliers and changing to special rate numbers. However, it was felt that smaller suppliers did not have the infrastructure resources to offer these alternatives, leading to a lack of choice.

‘We are using 0870 numbers and abandoning local suppliers. We are not migrating business, but have moved from local rate with one supplier to national rate with another. The underlying pipe remained the same.’

‘Rather than switching suppliers, we put in multiple lines and switch calls.’

‘We do the same, not necessarily for commercial reasons but for resilience. Smaller suppliers do not have the resources for this.’

‘There is inertia from the cellphone/networks/service providers re number porting and migrating – it is still difficult to change suppliers but keep the number.’

‘The main obstacles to switching supplier are the technical and cost implications that would result from a large scale move of supplier/network. The spread of offices also restricts opportunities.’

‘On tendering, for example, we would not use [x supplier] as we have few sites up there and it would therefore not be economical.’

How are large businesses comparing suppliers?

5.14 Large businesses felt that the existing sources of information were on the whole inappropriate with insufficient detail and being too general, and were more suitable for SMEs. In their place, businesses were relying on a more informal method of word of mouth and networking for comparing suppliers. Businesses were being referred by suppliers to their existing customers to gain information.

‘The requirements and expectations of customers are different so the only way of benchmarking is to speak to other customers. Otherwise it is difficult to get this information on a reliable basis.’

‘We invite 6-10 suppliers to tender. Experience and word of mouth ties it down to a choice between 10. Usually we know through experience, the background on the companies and which have the best profile for deciding.’

‘Our comparing is unsophisticated and is based on suppliers’ infrastructure (with detailed information from them on reliance, routing etc). On the matter of quality of service, we treat them as innocent until proven guilty and then we will move traffic onto our other suppliers if they prove incompetent. We rely on word of mouth for suppliers’ reputations for billing. We just do not pay if the billing is wrong.’

‘We get information from forums like this, chatting with other telecom managers.’

5.15 However, businesses perceived several drawbacks with this informal method of comparing suppliers. They were aware that this might be a biased source of information with suppliers possibly selecting their best customers to act as referees.

‘The company asks its suppliers for customer references and then discusses choice, tariff etc (a user network). A confidentiality clause with vendors can make discussion between users difficult. We approach suppliers to contact existing customers for references on the supplier however, these may be biased as suppliers likely to put forward users with whom they have good relations.’

5.16 Also, businesses were finding it difficult to collect information such as quality of service through networking. Another area of difficult was comparison of tariffs.

‘Quality of service is very difficult to benchmark. Tariffing is a major concern.’

‘Overall, tariffs are too complicated by distance, time of day, tariff fees making it very difficult to compare service offerings.’

5.17 The Comparable Performance Indicators (CPIs) were felt not to be relevant for large businesses but more suitable for SMEs and residential consumers. Given the importance of resilience, large businesses required guarantees to be written into contracts rather than relying on information such as the CPIs. Also, businesses felt that their circumstances and requirements were too individual to be covered by generic comparison information.

‘CPIs are not at the right level for corporates. We need resilience and we need to have this specified in contracts.’

‘We might look at CPIs where substantial differences in the figures in the CPIs have arisen.’

‘CPIs have more value for SMEs and consumers.’

‘We contract for 100% resilience and therefore do not need to use CPIs, it is not good enough for it to say that it is resilient. Membership of users associations such as the CMA and TUA is helpful and networking is invaluable. We rely on word of mouth and experience.’

‘More information is required but I am concerned that currently the information is too general and lacks granularity.’

5.18 Several businesses had used market research reports in the past to compare suppliers that they had used in the past. They were keen to use similar research in the future, particularly on international benchmarking, though were deterred by the expense of commissioning or obtaining this information from consultants. A possible solution to this may be businesses forming a syndicate to purchase their own international benchmarking study.

‘Ovum, a consultancy conducted reports among its user constituents, for example a report on the benefits of using VPN. However, Ovum no longer undertake this type of analysis for users. We would be interested in Oftel doing a benchmarking study to provide accurate information. An informal group of companies has been set up to discuss experience.’

‘CMA’s subjective annual survey is as useful as anything. It is usually conducted among medium and large corporates. Suppliers are usually ok if they are not written against.’

‘The CMA survey might influence who you tender. We do not go to very new suppliers as they have no track record.’

‘We require more information to compare suppliers on prices/services particularly for benchmarking purposes.’

‘The company want to buy global services not on a company by company basis, and therefore want benchmarking on an international basis. There was a useful Oftel International benchmarking report around four years ago.’

‘There is a need for international benchmarking, it is expensive with consultancies quoting £30-40,000 for this service.’

Customer service/account management

5.19 Businesses’ experience of customer service/account management was mixed, satisfactory service seemingly dependent on individual account managers and teams. Some reported worsening service due to suppliers’ lack of resources, one complaint being that account management was turning into a sales role with a lack of after-sales support. Others, however, were satisfied with the service they received and praised their suppliers for the efforts they had made.

‘Companies come in promising better prices and service using 50 suppliers then they don’t have the resources to fulfil promises, and the company cannot manage and no-one knows what is going on.’

‘These companies, smaller access operators, do not have the systems to deal with this. Companies should have back-up services to cope even when staff are absent. As competition bites, companies have to cut back on staff. The right team in the right place is very hit and miss.’

‘PSTN is fine. The response time with ISDN, which we use for homeworking, is not good. We argue with our account manager but this does not produce results. The suppliers fail to fulfil promises on low-value lines. We would rather get good service than compensation. For example, our company lost contact with our lawyer for three weeks, this is costly to the company.’

‘We do not deal with small carriers because we need national coverage, however with large carriers, customer service is getting worse.’

‘Suppliers need to deliver what they say they are going to, especially in terms of account management which is now turning into a sales role. Once suppliers have sold their service there tends to be a lack of after-sales service.’

‘I have found that the company has delivered what it has promised.’

‘I work at home and when I had a problem I contacted our account manager though the company and the problem was solved. Service received is dependent on the individual account manager.’

‘We have monthly reports on service from suppliers however, account managers are not totally honest in these reports.’

Some suppliers seem more flexible in the way they work than others, initially working on service level agreements rather than contracts although they are going towards contracts now. We have review meetings, these are written into the contract, with suppliers not only on general business but also on new services they are offering as well as on prices.’

‘Because of the size of our network, two UK operators have been proactive and have installed fibre rings around and into our premises to connect the company to their global network. This illustrates their commitment to forming a partnership.’

Large businesses’ experience of suppliers

5.20 A number of businesses felt that their suppliers were making no effort to regain lost business in contrast to other suppliers and were becoming less enthusiastic about service.

‘Old telecom culture still exists in many of the UK and national players. Incumbents often practice a ‘follow me’ strategy of incumbents instead of thinking ‘outside the box’.’

‘As a result of the decreasing amount of business going to [x supplier] at large sites, it appears that the dross is being given to [x supplier] who then responds with less enthusiasm to service.’

‘Other suppliers appear to be more hungry. They fight back against losses.

‘You can tell the supplier how to win back your business, you tell individuals who then go back to the company who then do not fight back, blaming regulation. The structure of the company means that it cannot deliver.’

‘Individuals from other companies go back to senior management and sort out how to win back/gain business.’

5.21 Others, however, were satisfied with their suppliers, particularly for extra features such as call statistics not supplied by other suppliers.

‘Our supplier is well organised to deal with work from our type of organisation than the other two we use who do not seem to have the resources. The difference seems to be the account team set-up. There is a team in place with years of experience which focuses entirely on customers from our type of organisation. Now that fewer and fewer of our type of organisation are buying directly from suppliers and therefore the existing teams have time to offer better service.’

‘The difference between our supplier and others manifests itself in different ways, in the account management set-up and in in-depth analysis of call traffic. It comes down to a trade between quality and price. There are lots of competitive suppliers. However, with 0800 numbers, only our supplier provides statistics on incoming calls.’

‘When we moved to other suppliers in the past, we had problems with billing details and statistics. Other companies talk about this but do not provide.’

5.22 Another issue to emerge was that some telecoms managers found it difficult to switch due to political influence elsewhere in their organisation.

‘[X supplier] is a large client of ours and internal politics means that it is difficult to move away from them.’

Billing/Tariffs

5.23 Large businesses were experiencing continuing problems with billing. Problems mentioned included accuracy, timeliness and disregard of billing instructions. The complexity of bills, tariffs and discounts was mentioned by several businesses, with calls for amalgamation of tariffs and standardised billing. An Oftel/industry project on billing is already working to address these issues and information relating to billing problems collected during the workshop will be passed on to the project team.

‘Billing is needed in the format required. Timeliness of billing is important, we have not been billed for July yet [monthly billing - now mid-Sept]. With accuracy of bills, we employ a full-time person to check bills to see whether discounts have been applied. Accuracy of billing depends on the service, for example, accuracy with voicecom is high, with mainstream services with discounts, we find errors of up to 20%.’

‘There is a reluctance to give timely credits whilst chasing for payments which cannot be passed without the credits. There is an apparent disregard for billing instructions. Very slow responses – and few apologies for errors.’

‘We have electronic validation of bills as we have 500 sites. The discounts need to be worked out electronically. Discounts are so complex now.’

‘Billing is too complex – amalgamation of tariffs required.’

‘Tariffing – there is a proliferation of complex charges. Our supplier provides unit call charges and discounts to three decimal places which is unnecessary and impossible for the customer to reconcile. All vendors should provide a simple standard tariff which can be easily understood by customers.’

‘We have problems with consolidation. The suppliers bolt on software to bill for new services which results in multiple bills. Carriers should be investing in new billing platforms.’

‘As many network operators do not have single billing platforms (operators bolt on new programmes for new services which can make billing a nightmare). MIS is poorly presented and should have the capability to be accessed on-line.’

‘Bills are sent to the customer which are not reconcilable, not detailed and unclear. Agreed standards are required on EDI, formatting and presentation of bills for all suppliers.’

Benefits and uses of the Internet/e-commerce

5.24 Businesses had mixed views of the Internet and e-commerce. Some were using the Internet as a static information source for their customers whilst others had developed their use further into e-commerce/e-procurement and on-line customer service, and also mentioned features such as extranets, data 0800 numbers, multi-lingual websites, as well as business opportunities including an e-commerce consultancy and user certification.

5.25 Businesses felt that there had been a general increase in efficiency due to the information now available, for example staff information on Intranets and telecoms information on the Internet. One business mentioned the Internet reducing the number of staff they needed, however, other benefits such as cost savings were mentioned briefly.

‘We have a large website targeted to potential clients. A rapidly expanding Intranet which is a prime staff information tool. We use the Internet to a limited degree for ordering from suppliers, eg for mobiles.’

‘Our external site is aimed at the practice side of our firm, for example the site has career opportunities for newly qualified staff to move on. It also has information on the services the company offers. The site is very much a library of information.’

‘Everything is being offered, everything done is on the web/Intranet. We are moving away from Lotus Notes, everything goes on the Intranet. We have tens of thousands of employees that are all connected with Internet and Intranet access. We have details of jobs on line, expenses, stationery ordering for homeworkers on line and are heavily into e-commerce.’

‘We have a website, Intranet and Extranet. Using it for expenses on line is beginning to come on. We would like to use it for electronic ordering from telcos, for example ordering lines, voicemail, there needs to be a range of products which can be ordered. We are looking to develop an extranets at our sites, closed user groups among the businesses at our sites which we have talked about but not yet developed. Our public site has dynamic information and can also be used for ordering products and services [others comment that this is not well-known and say that they would definitely use this facility]. We have links to other sites and also own part of another well-known website which has a synergy with the rest of the business.’

‘We are planning to set up extranets. For example, these will be used for information for businesses around our sites, we currently use a dedicated network. We are planning that the Extranet will develop with use, eg special offers for staff, electronic trading facilities for example for catering companies hosted on the Extranet – they currently order individually. The extranets would be high security and specific to individual sites. We have a problem persuading our organisation that this would be worthwhile.’

‘We are using e-commerce as a marketing and sales medium in addition to our traditional sales methods. We are experiencing huge volume increases on an on-going basis. Our customer service on line includes on line statements, flight booking, paying on line. With this last feature, more people are now paying on line and therefore fewer are now needed at customer service centres. However, in some instances, customers will still always need to speak to a person.’

‘Multilingual information is important and we use 7 languages, we need to remember that it is a global service. There are two buttons on the main page, a privacy button which explains what the company does with the information and a feedback button.’

‘E-commerce provides opportunities for cost reduction at a business to business level and new routes to market for business to consumer which we have and will continue to exploit.’

‘The Intranet is very useful for items such as the internal telephone directory and publishing of policy documents for example disciplinary procedures – it reduces paper flow. However, usage is low as these are not the sort of thing which are very much used.’

‘It is ideal for a big structured database, such as we have. It is also useful for graphical, unstructured data for example about getting about our sites which is very popular with customers. Simple questions can now be answered by Internet and people are more prepared to ask simple questions which otherwise they would not feel like asking. However, we will always need people for some queries.’

‘We get telecoms quality of service information from other sites. Another example is that we get information on telecoms regulations in different countries for example we have used the Internet for information on telecoms regulations in Mauritius. I also receive notices about recent publications from Oftel.’

‘[X supplier] has their price list on the Internet, you have to pay for a hard copy.’

‘Information on the Internet has greatly improved efficiency generally.’

Less beneficial aspects of the Internet/e-commerce

5.26 Several businesses mentioned that they were on the Internet to keep up with competitors whilst being unsure of the benefits it had brought. It was seen as an investment for the future and in most cases had not yet proved itself more efficient or profitable.

‘Our site turned over £400,000 in the last quarter though it has a low profile and has not really taken off, it is seen as a benefit for the future – it is not an efficient way of selling products etc. We are on the Internet because we have got to be there, service offered by our competitors so we need to offer it. People are looking rather than buying at the moment. It is an investment for the future and not a more efficient sales method yet for most of our services or products. We are losing a bit of money at the moment though not masses.’

‘Our competitors have sites so we need one too.’

‘We do not directly know what benefits the Internet has brought.’

‘All invoices and pay are dealt with centrally. People now have to contact Glasgow for pay queries so it does not add to efficiency.’

5.27 It was felt that the move towards Internet/e-commerce was not being held back by technical issues but rather depended on businesses adapting, for example with e-procurement, businesses would need to decide which staff could make orders and introducing a new culture of staff acting without authorisation.

‘Technology is not the issue, psychology and business reorganisation is more important for the change towards the Internet.’

‘We are setting up e-procurement, for example billing is ongoing, it will be finished in 9-12 months. We are having problems with the number of people who can connect, with problems arranging who can make orders – this restructuring is more important than technology matters, there is a new culture of not getting authorisation.’

5.28 Although businesses were relying on e-mail, other methods of communication were seen, in some cases, to be preferable to Intranet/e-mail, for example, quicker and easier or better for building relationships. Nor had on-line information replaced physical information such as company brochures.

‘Our external site is very successful though our Intranet site is complicated. For internal communications, there are other things that are quicker and easier to use than the Intranet, the staff need to be trained in how to use it. We have not moved away from physical information, eg company brochures.’

‘With e-mail, we have been told to consider other communications to build relationships, we are told to consider which communication is efficient. Homeworkers can feel isolated and the phone helps.’

5.29 A problem was mentioned with encryption for businesses working operating abroad, with different levels of encryption legal in different countries.

‘Encryption levels vary by country and therefore we need to comply with these. For example, UK encryption levels are higher than in some EU countries. There are also some countries where hardware and software, for example North Korea and Iraq, are illegal to import. We are speaking to ITU via ITUG to be involved in encryption.’*

* The ITU (International Telecommunication Union) is an organisation based in Geneva within which governments and the prviate sector co-ordinate global telecom networks and services.  The ITUG (International Tandem Users' Group) is a Compaq user group which focuses on issues such as interoperability and interconnection.

5.30 None of the participants had experienced problems with security and Internet.

Hosting and management of Internet/Intranet sites

5.31 Most Intranet sites were hosted internally – security and control of the level of service were mentioned. Internet sites tended to be on an external host with greater resources and management mentioned.

‘Our Intranet is hosted internally to provide security and control of the level of service. We do not want external access to the Intranet. We have an external host for the website as the provider has greater resources and management.’

[advantage of hosting Intranet and website separately] –‘We can close the Intranet without shutting the website.’

5.32 Internet and telecoms issues appeared still to be managed separately. Internet/Intranet sites were not being managed by telecoms staff who dealt largely with voice, data and mobile but not with Internet with the exception of tariffing and contributing information from a regulatory perspective. Neither were ISPs chosen by telecoms staff. It was suggested that interaction may change when links are made to customer-facing staff.

‘We have a separate interactive group for Intranet/Internet for hardware and software. We have separate dealing for voice/fax/telephone and then Internet and contracts etc.’

‘Our voice and data people are only responsible for links not content.’

‘ISPs are chosen by different people than choice of telcos.’

Reliability of the e-mail system

5.33 Panel members relied heavily on their e-mail systems in their work with breakdowns when they occurred halting work, however, panel members mentioned that their systems were resilient and problems could be sorted out quickly

‘The internal data network is absolutely vital, business stops when the system breaks down.’

‘We have had no break downs in the last three years. However, when the system is taken down overnight for maintenance, this affects calls from abroad.’

‘We do not have breakdowns often but breakdowns stop people’s work as they have become used to the system and have forgotten how to work without it.’

‘We host our e-mail system internally so problems are sorted quickly.’

‘The system is resilient although problems do cause major issues when they occur.’

‘Breakdowns do not last long as we have an internal helpdesk.’

‘It is very important for breakdowns to be sorted quickly.’

Broadband

5.34 Panel members said they were prepared to pay for bandwidth although the expense of broadband was also mentioned, including for consumers wanting to access companies’ websites. One panellist suggested that, whilst prepared to pay more for greater bandwidth, the unit cost would have to be significantly lower than current charges (eg for leased lines), adding that, whilst perhaps not a valid comparison, the difference in tariffs for 512k ADSL compared to 64k leased lines was huge.

‘Broadband is too expensive for consumers, it is needed for them to access the company website. Our company has to expand their network, expand our use of leased lines. Leased lines are expensive and therefore we are interested in Oftel’s leased line study. All have an effect on how the Internet is developed.’

‘Companies are prepared to spend on greater bandwidth and resilience. Concerns are cost, accessibility, resilience and connectability.’

Advanced Services

5.35 Large businesses were using and interested in a variety of advanced telecoms services.

‘We currently use ISDN, DSL, LL, EDI, Fixed Wireless Access Services. WAP and other new services are currently in our strategic thinking and planning.’

‘We use ISDN - specialised homeworking solution but it has few users (+/- 200), CTI which we use in call centres and Teleware Virtual Office Systems.’

‘We use VPN, ISDN, leased lines, EDI, CTI and WAP phones. In time, we expect to make use of other advanced services (DSL, fixed wireless broadband services).’

‘[X suppliers’] networks cannot receive inbound PSTN calls which means that the customer has to provide addition channels (eg approximately 10,000 in our organisation) with subsequent additional capital and revenue expenditure.’

5.36 However, one business felt that more needed to be done to ensure that consumers could access these services.

‘The area of advanced services disappoints and I think that more needs to be done to ensure the technologies are able to be exploited by consumers.’

Convergence

5.37 A number of businesses were involved in projects within their companies examining the convergence of fixed, mobile and Internet services. The projects were addressing issues such as the cost implications and studying the best technology. The group could see a role for VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) and said that users would probably pay according to quality of service across the networks.

5.38 The Panel members felt that there needed to be a balance between what customers think they want and the cost implications. They wanted to see how convergence worked out and added that it would depend on the business’ position in its sector as to whether it was prepared to take risks with new technology.

‘We are in the middle of a project looking at convergence, for example VoIP.’

‘Convergence is limited by the cost of terminals.’

‘ITU’s rulings have to be considered internationally. Developing countries lose out. Should be able to pay for the level of service you need.’

‘The providers want some of the profits which will drive forward the service.’

‘Our infrastructure would not be able to cope at the moment. If the service is beneficial to the company then we will adapt.’

‘We are building new IP networks in order to integrate voice and data applications.’

Has there been a transfer of calls from fixed to mobile telecoms within large businesses?

5.39 Businesses varied as to whether they were using mobiles as a replacement for fixed telecoms.

‘Not to a large extent. The application of fixed and mobile are still being treated as different partly because of resilience and differences in tariffs.’

‘Yes, total spend on mobiles likely to exceed fixed.’

‘We are currently looking at mobile working – mobiles for business used in and out of the office. We are interested in developments in ‘virtual extension’.’

‘There is little evidence of a shift.’

contents


6. Next Steps

6.1 The main issues to emerge from the workshop are listed below with details of work currently being undertaken to address these problems.

Lack of fixed and mobile competition

Fixed competition

6.2 Businesses at the workshop emphasised the importance of resilience in their choice of telecoms supplier with their insistence on using only suppliers with their own network infrastructure. Following on from this, some businesses felt that there was a lack of infrastructure competition in some parts of the country, leading to little choice other than BT. It is hoped that Oftel’s requirement for BT to unbundle the local loop will increase competition and lead to lower prices for customers.

6.3 The expense of broadband was another concern which may be addressed through local loop unbundling and the consequent offerings of alternatives to BT’s ADSL from competing suppliers. In addition, cable modems and the possible development of alternative broadband technologies such as broadband radio, fixed and mobile wireless access and satellite access to compete with ADSL may help to bring down prices and increase choice in terms of speed and access.

6.4 Another development, following Oftel’s recent review of leased lines, is the requirement for BT to offer wholesale leased line services to other operators issued under a draft direction and statement of December 2000, giving them greater opportunity to compete with BT, leading to reduced prices.

Mobile competition

6.5 On the Panel’s complaints of lack of mobile competition, Oftel is studying the extent of competition in the Mobile Market Review, with a consultation document due shortly. Oftel is aware of specific business concerns about roaming prices and the extent to which customer information is adequate, and will be looking at roaming services specifically as part of the review.

6.6 As far as choice is concerned, there are currently four operators and Dolphin competing in that part of the market which needs predominantly closed-user group services. A further operator is due to enter the market with 3G. There are also a number of independent service providers in the market.

6.7 Some businesses had encountered problems with porting numbers when switching mobile provider. Similarly, Oftel’s quarterly survey of SMEs1 also identifies some areas where mobile portability is not delivering the benefits of easy switching as perhaps it should. Operators are aware of this, and, encouraged by Oftel, have been working together to develop improved processes for handling requests to transfer numbers. Oftel expects the industry to deliver improvements that will make the transfer of numbers cheaper, more reliable, faster and more user-friendly during 2001.

Benchmarking/comparative tariff information

6.8 Another area of concern for the businesses taking part in the workshop was difficulty in comparing suppliers. Due to the specific telecoms requirements of large businesses, particularly in their requirement for resilience, existing generalised sources of information such as the Comparable Performance Indicators were little used and not felt to be appropriate. However, the cost of purchasing more appropriate benchmarking information on suppliers from consultants was seen as prohibitive to individual companies, suggesting the possibility, perhaps through the Panel, of businesses forming syndicates to purchase this type of information themselves.

6.9 Businesses also felt that the complexity of tariffs available made it difficult to compare service offerings. Oftel is currently looking at raising awareness and use of third-party sources of comparative tariff information. One suggestion has been for Oftel to establish an accreditation scheme for providers of price comparison information to assure users of the reliability of the information provided.

Customer service problems

6.10 Several businesses participating in the workshop had encountered problems with account management, some suppliers failing to fulfil promises due to lack of resources and others showing little enthusiasm for service.

6.11 Only a very small proportion of the 100,000 complaints and enquiries made to Oftel each year are from large businesses. A large proportion of the complaints Oftel receives from consumers relate to customer service issues and Oftel holds regular meetings with the main offending operators to discuss the complaints and makes public complaints data. However, ultimately, operators need to resolve problems themselves or risk losing their customers.

Billing problems

6.12 The panel complained of ongoing problems with billing in terms of timeliness, accuracy and complexity.

6.13 Billing is the subject of Oftel’s project on the metering and billing approval scheme launched by an industry workshop in April 2000 to take forward the Oftel consultation document ‘Meeting customer needs for accurate telephone bills’ and subsequent statement ‘Ensuring telephone bills are accurate’. The scope of the scheme is to improve consumers’ confidence in the integrity and accuracy of bills. It will aim to cover all licensed PTOs, starting with major operators. Other service providers and resellers will subsequently be encouraged to join the scheme.

If you have queries relating to the information above, please contact individual project managers as identified in Oftel’s Management Plan (available at www.oftel.gov.uk/about/mapl0400.htm or through Oftel’s Research and Intelligence Unit on 020 7634 8761).

contents


Appendix A: Pre-workshop questionnaire

To allow us to match the group discussions with Panel members’ interests, we would ask you to number as many of the topics below as are of interest to your company (eg, if telecommodity exchanges is the subject you would most like to discuss, put ‘1’ against this subject, then ‘2’ for your second choice etc), and return the questionnaire to Oftel by 31 July 2000. Panel members are welcome to bring another member of their company to take part in the workshop if they would be better placed to discuss the topics chosen.

 

Please insert number in this column

Is competition sufficiently established in different telecoms markets (eg in the mobile, fixed line, domestic, international markets etc)? Do Panel members feel there is enough choice? What obstacles are there to switching supplier?  

If interested in this topic, please indicate which markets (including any not listed) you are interested in discussing in the space below

 

 

 

Is more information needed to compare suppliers on prices/services offered/availability in their area/quality of service?
What are the main problems Panel members have experienced with their telecoms suppliers? Have suppliers responded to their complaints adequately?

 

If interested in this topic, please give a brief outline of problem areas in the space below

 

 

 

 

 

Please insert number in this column

Is your company encouraging the development of competition between telecoms suppliers? How is it doing this? What effect is such market making activity having? What targets have you got for further developments in ‘growing the competition’?  
   
What is the potential of telecommodity exchanges (trading spare capacity resulting from growth in new networks)?  
   
How has the use of the Internet/intranets affected the efficiency of your company?  
   
What benefits has e-commerce brought to your company? How do Panel members see its use increasing?  
   
How much use are Panel members making of advanced services (eg VPN, ISDN, DSL, leased lines, EDI, CTI, WAP phones, fixed wireless broadband services etc)? What problems have they encountered installing/using any of these services? How much will Panel members use these services in the future?  

If interested in this topic, please indicate which services (including any not listed) you are interested in discussing in the space below

 

 

 

   
Have you taken advantage of schemes offering discounts based on whole-company spend? Have other telcos responded with similar offers?  
   
 

Please insert number in this column

What examples of converging communications technologies has your company experienced? What are the prospects for competition in these services?  
   
Has there been a transfer of voice call minutes from fixed to mobile telecoms within your company? How significant a trend is this?  
   
Have billing services of telcos improved recently – from any one/several suppliers?  
   
What scope is there for telecoms competition for companies using call centres (either internal or external)?  

contents

home

Layout image
Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image