|
|
Technical Frequency Assignment CriteriaFixed Point-to-Point Radio Services with Digital Modulation Operating in the Frequency Range 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to 15.35 GHz Version 1.0 (June 2003) |
RA406
is also available in
(172
KB)
Foreword
It is required by the Wireless Telegraphy Acts, 1949 and 1998 that no radio apparatus shall be installed or used in the United Kingdom, except under the authority of a licence granted by the Secretary of State. It is a condition of such a licence that the performance of the radio equipment meets certain minimum standards laid down in the UK Radio Interface Requirement 2000 (UK RIR 2000). Compliance will have been notified in accordance with the R&TTE (Radio Equipment and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment) Directive.
This document details the frequency assignment criteria and principles that will be employed by Radiocommunications Agency (RA) in the selection of frequencies for use by compliant fixed terrestrial (point-to-point) digital radio equipment operating in the band or frequency range specified.
These assignment criteria are subject to updating and amendment, and intending operators/manufacturers should consult the latest version of this document complete with any amendments. Single copies of this document are available free from the RA library at the address below:
Radiocommunications
Agency
Library Services
Wyndham House
189 Marsh Wall
London E14 9SX.
Switchboard
and 24 hour enquiry service:
Telephone: 020 7211 0211
Library
and Publicity:
Telephone: 020 7211 0502/0505
Fax: 020 7211 0507
This document outlines the frequency assignment criteria and principles that will be employed by RA in the selection of frequencies for use by fixed terrestrial (point-to-point) digital radio services operating in the frequency ranges 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to 15.35 GHz.
The channel plan shall be in accordance with that given in section 5.
This document has been generated to take into account the equipment standard EN 301 128 V1.2.1, EN 300 639 V1.3.1 and EN 300 234 V1.3.2. RA will currently license the following classes of equipment:
| Class 2 | equipment
performances based on typically 4-state modulation schemes (e.g.: 4-FSK, 4-PSK or equivalent); |
| Class 3 | equipment
performances based on typically 8-state modulation schemes (e.g.: 8-PSK or equivalent); |
| Class 4 | equipment
performance based on typically 16 or 32-state modulation schemes (e.g.: 16-QAM, 32-QAM or equivalent); |
| Class 5 | equipment
performance based on typically 64 or 128-state modulation schemes (e.g.: 64-QAM, 128-QAM or equivalent); |
| Class 5a | Adjacent Channel Alternate Polarisation (ACAP) operation; |
| Class 5b | Adjacent Channel Co-polarisation (ACCP) operation. |
The Foreword of this document states that the establishment, use or installation of transmitting or receiving apparatus is subject to the issue of a licence by the Secretary of State. The licensee must ensure that equipment conforms with and is maintained to the standards referenced in UK RIR 2000.
RA operates a link length policy to promote the use of the highest possible frequency band for the distance over which the link is to operate. For the 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to 15.35 GHz band the minimum path length is 9.5 km for systems with traffic rates equal to or above 2 Mbit/s, below 140 Mbit/s and including Analogue FM-video. Systems at 140 Mbit/s and above will be permitted over path lengths ≥ 5.5 km. Below these distances there will be some expectation that a higher frequency band or alternative means of traffic transfer could be used.
2. Transmitting and Receiving Installations
The transmitting and receiving installations shall conform to sections 2.2 and 2.3 below. The installations shall be implemented in accordance with good engineering practice.
The antenna installation at the licensed premises shall be such that the antenna pattern will not exceed the co-polar and cross-polar Radiation Pattern Envelopes (RPE) given in UK RIR 2000 with the zero degree datum being the boresight path between the two stations.
The plane of polarisation of emissions for a particular radio link will be specified by RA and will normally be vertical or horizontal linear polarisation.
The antenna alignment surface shall be aligned as precisely as possible to the true vertical or true horizontal and the misalignment shall be no greater than 3°.
2.4 Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP)
The assigned value of EIRP will be stated in the licence and must not be exceeded, although a tolerance of ±3 dB on this assigned value will be allowed in practice. Under no circumstance is the EIRP to exceed 50 dBW.
3. Principles of Assignment and EIRP Derivation
A normal frequency assignment for a single or multi-section bi-directional link shall comprise a pair of radio frequencies of corresponding channel number; one from each of the low and high frequency groups.
3.1.1 Normal Assignment Flow Diagram
Annex C shows a flow diagram for the normal assignment process.
3.2 Multi-Section Links and Repeater Stations
In the case of a multi-section link the direction of transmission of the two frequencies shall alternate for successive repeater sections so that the transmitter frequency assigned to any station shall be taken from only one of the frequency groups in the lower or upper half of the band.
The frequency difference between a pair of corresponding go and return frequencies in 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to 15.35 GHz band shall be 728 MHz.
3.4 Parallel Links Operating Over the Same Path
Due to the fading characteristics in this frequency band the interference assessment for parallel links operating over the same path will be calculated by assuming that fading of wanted and interfering signals is correlated. Therefore, protection from interference is derived from frequency separation and cross-polar discrimination (if any). To be classed as operating over the same path, the stations located at the sites at each end of the links must be within 10 m of each other in the horizontal plane and within 2 m in the vertical plane.
Table 1 lists the minimum frequency separations for like systems operating under these conditions. For mixed capacity systems, the appropriate minimum separations are derived by the sum of half of the individual minimum separations given. The assignment software identifies available channels that meet the minimum frequency separation criteria, in accordance with the channel plan defined in section 5.
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
Table 1: Frequency Separations
In assigning frequencies for links which are in the same geographical area, due consideration shall be taken of antenna discrimination. When available, data derived from a manufacturer's guaranteed RPE will be used. Otherwise, the appropriate RPE specified in ETSI standard EN 300 833 will be assumed.
RA will usually assume that each hop has a clearance from obstructions of not less than 0.577F between the transmitting and receiving antennas at the two stations under conditions corresponding to values of the ratio K greater than 0.7.
F: First Fresnel zone clearance
K: Ratio of effective earth radius to real earth radius
Obstructed paths will be allowed where their need is clearly demonstrated, with an EIRP increased up to a maximum of 6 dB above the normal assignment level providing that the maximum limit of 50 dBW is not exceeded. Above this level operators will be expected to accept the possible lower link availability. The following conditions will apply:
Detail of the assignment process modifications to deal with operation over an obstructed path is given in Annex D.
The median path loss between two stations is equal to the free-space-path-loss (FSPL) plus the atmospheric gaseous absorption:
| FSPL = 92.45 + 20log(d) + 20log(f) | |
| Median path loss (dB) = FSPL + gaseous absorption | |
| Where: | d = distance between the stations in km; |
| f = frequency of operation in GHz; | |
| gaseous absorption see section 3.7.2. | |
The link budget shall include contributions from gaseous absorption in addition to the basic FSPL. The predicted gaseous absorption is based on oxygen and water vapour data obtained from ITU-R Rec. P.676-2. At 15.35 GHz a worst case gaseous specific attenuation of 0.041 dB/km shall be assumed, based on ground level, air temperature of 15°C and a water vapour density of 10 g/m3 (see ITU-R Rec. P.836-1, Figure 4).
An availability greater than 99.99% is to be agreed with RA on a case-by-case basis.
NOTE: Throughout this specification, availability will be taken to mean propagation availability.
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Table 2: Receiver Median Signal Levels
RA will in general examine applications for the use of radio links on the assumption that the median signal level of the receiver input is as detailed in Table 2 and a transmitter power shall be assigned accordingly.
The levels in Table 2 are derived from a link budget as given in Annex A.
Fade margins are calculated according to Recommendation ITU-R P.530-7 §2.3 and §2.4 for clear-air and hydrometeor (rain) fading respectively. Note that the Recommendation refers to clear-air fading as due to "multipath and related factors"; the more general term "clear-air" is used here.
Fade margin is calculated by apportioning the overall permissible unavailability between clear-air and rain fading. The assignment software utilises the equations for clear-air and rain fading given in P.530-7 §2.3 and §2.4 respectively to iterate for the value of fade for which the sum of the individual (clear-air and rain) unavailabilities equals the required overall unavailability. It is assumed that rain and total atmospheric fades are unlikely to occur simultaneously. For cases where the ratio of outage times for rain and clear-air exceeds 40 only the dominant method is calculated.
The fade margin required for clear-air effects depends on frequency, path length, radio-climatic factors, and the service availability required. The fade exceeded for a given percentage of an average year is calculated according to Recommendation ITU-R P.530-7 §2.3.
The rain fade margin for a given availability depends on the path length, frequency, polarisation and geographic location. UK rain rates exceeded for 0.01% of an average year are shown in Annex E at the centre of each 100-km grid square. This rain-rate data is obtained from UK meteorological records.
The rain fade is derived as follows:
Values of regression coefficients,
and
, are given in
Table 3 below for both horizontal (H) and vertical (V) polarisation. These have
been derived by interpolation between the values in Table 1 of ITU-R Rec. P.838-1,
for the highest frequency in the band:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3: Regression Coefficients
The path reduction term, r, is given in ITU-R Rec. P.530-7 as:
![]() |
|
| where: |
The
effective path length,
,
is found by multiplying the actual physical path length,
,
by the reduction term,
,
found above.
The path attenuation exceeded for 0.01% of time is given by equation 37 of ITU-R Rec. P.530-7:
| where: |
The
attenuation,
,
exceeded for other time percentages,
,
(over the range 0.001% to 1%) can be deduced from equation 38 of ITU-R Rec.
P.530-7:
Links whose calculated fade is less than 10 dB will be allocated a fade margin of 10 dB.
3.11 Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power Calculation
The licence schedule will detail the assigned EIRP for each transmitting station. This is based on the following calculation:
EIRP = Rx median signal level + Rx station feeder losses - Rx antenna gain + Path loss
Where the Rx (receiver) median signal level is as defined in Table 2. The maximum co-polar gain figure for the receiving antenna is used.
The link to be assigned is co-ordinated with all other links in the same frequency band within a co-ordination zone radius of 200 km around each site. The size of the co-ordination zone may be reviewed from time to time as operational experience is gathered. Interference to and from the proposed link is assessed taking into account the path profile between the two stations. Use is made of antenna radiation patterns to obtain the gain of antennas in the direction of unwanted signals.
The two conditions considered in the evaluation of interference from each single-entry interference source are:
If either of the above two conditions are not met, and an alternative frequency cannot be ascertained, the link will not be assigned.
The procedures followed are in line with ITU-R Rec. P.452-7 and outlined in the flow diagram shown in Annex D.
The interference limits are derived as follows:
Interference limit = receiver sensitivity level (RSL) for a bit error rate of 10-6 - W/U ratio.
4.3 Co and Adjacent Channel Limits
The maximum co-channel and adjacent channel interference limits, at the receiver input, from a single unwanted source are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. W/U ratios for single-entry interferers relating to mixed capacity digital systems are shown in the matrices in Annex B.
The adjacent channel interference limits given in Table 5 do not apply to links operating on a parallel path over the same hop. Under these circumstances fading is assumed correlated with interference protection offered by frequency discrimination (and possibly cross-polar antenna discrimination if applicable). See section 3.4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
-143 |
|
|
2 x 2 in 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 in 3.5 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-137 |
|
|
|
|
-134 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4: Single Entry Co-Channel Interference limits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
-122 |
|
|
2 x 2 in 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 in 3.5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-108 |
|
|
|
|
-105 |
|
|
|
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5: Single Entry Adjacent Channel Interference Limits.
In Table 4 and Table 5 as well as Annex B, the single-entry digital W/U ratios include allowances for multiple interferers. The allowances are 4 dB for co-channel interferers and 6 dB for adjacent channel interferers independent of bit-rate.
5.1 Derivation of Radio Frequency Channels for the Band 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to 15.35 GHz
For the band 14.50 GHz to 15.35 GHz, the radio frequency channel arrangements based on CEPT/ERC Recommendation 12-07 E for carrier spacings of 56 MHz, 28 MHz, 14 MHz, 7 MHz, 3.5 MHz and 1.75 MHz as illustrated in Figure.1 shall be derived as follows:
|
Let:
|
f0 be the reference frequency of 14924 MHz; | |
|
|
fn be the centre frequency (MHz) of a radio frequency channel in the lower half of the band; | |
|
|
f'n be the centre frequency (MHz) of a radio frequency channel in the upper half of the band. | |
| Individual channel frequencies are expressed by the following relationships: | ||
|
a)
|
For systems with a carrier spacing of 56 MHz: | |
|
|
lower half of the band: | fn = (f0 - 451 + 56n) MHz; |
|
|
upper half of the band: | f'n = (f0 + 277 + 56n) MHz; |
|
|
where n = 1,2. | |
|
b)
|
For systems with a carrier spacing of 28 MHz: | |
|
|
lower half of the band: | fn = (f0 - 437 + 28n) MHz; |
|
|
upper half of the band: | f'n = (f0 + 291 + 28n) MHz; |
|
|
where n = 1,2,...4. | |
|
c)
|
For systems with a carrier spacing of 14 MHz: | |
|
|
lower half of the band: | fn = (f0 - 423 + 14n) MHz; |
|
|
upper half of the band: | f'n = (f0 + 305 + 14n) MHz; |
|
|
where n = 1,2,...8. | |
|
d)
|
For systems with a carrier spacing of 7 MHz: | |
|
|
lower half of the band: | fn = (f0 - 426.5 + 7n) MHz; |
|
|
upper half of the band: | f'n = (f0 + 301.5 + 7n) MHz; |
|
|
where n = 1,2,...16. | |
|
e)
|
For systems with a carrier spacing of 3.5 MHz: | |
|
|
lower half of the band: | fn = (f0 - 424.75 + 3.5n) MHz; |
|
|
upper half of the band: | f'n = (f0 + 303.25 + 3.5n) MHz; |
|
|
where n = 1,2,...32. | |
|
f)
|
For systems with a carrier spacing of 1.75 MHz: | |
|
|
lower half of the band: | fn = (f0 - 423.875 + 1.75n) MHz; |
|
|
upper half of the band: | f'n = (f0 + 304.125 + 1.75n) MHz; |
|
|
where n = 1,2,...64. | |

Figure
1: Channel arrangement for the 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to
15.35 GHz frequency ban
| NOTE: | National co-ordination with MOD will be required due to a 1 MHz incursion into the NATO band 14.62 15.23 GHz by the lower edge of the sub-band 15.229 15.350 GHz, for the lowest specified channel. |
Annex A: Receiver Input Levels and Interference Levels
Table A.1 and Table A.2 give examples of receiver input levels and maximum permitted interference levels for digital systems operating in the frequency band 14.5 to 14.62 GHz paired with 15.23 to 15.35 GHz.
| Channel Bandwidth (MHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Minimum Bit Rate (Mbit/s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Assumed Modulation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Thermal Noise, KT (dBW/Hz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Receiver Bandwidth, B (dBHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Receiver Noise, KTB (dBW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Noise Figure (dB) (NOTE 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| S/N for BER = 10-6 without Coding Gain (dB) (NOTE 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| S/N for BER = 10-6 with Coding Gain (dB) (NOTE 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Fixed System Losses (dB) (NOTE 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Interference Margin (dB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Receiver Sensitivity Level for BER = 10-6 (dBW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Median Reciever Input Level (dBW) (NOTE 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Planned Co-Channel Interference Limit (dBW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Table A.1: Example Noise Budget and Interference Calculations for Digital Systems
| Channel Bandwidth (MHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Minimum Bit Rate (Mbit/s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Assumed Modulation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Thermal Noise, KT (dBW/Hz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Receiver Bandwidth, B (dBHz) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Receiver Noise, KTB (dBW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Noise Figure (dB) (NOTE 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| S/N for BER = 10-6 without Coding Gain (dB) (NOTE 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| S/N for BER = 10-6 with Coding Gain (dB) (NOTE 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Fixed System Losses (dB) (NOTE 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Interference Margin (dB) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Receiver Sensitivity Level for BER = 10-6 (dBW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Median Reciever Input Level (dBW) (NOTE 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Planned Co-Channel Interference Limit (dBW) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Table A.2: Example Noise Budget and Interference Calculations for Digital Systems
Annex B: Wanted to Unwanted Ratios
Tables B1 to B14 give the Wanted to Unwanted (W/U) ratios for all frequency offsets up to three times and, in some cases, beyond three times the mean value of the wanted and unwanted channel spacing.
The figures in the Annex B tables have been derived on the following basis:
Co-channel and adjacent channel W/U ratios for like with like systems have been linked to Tables 4 and 5 and therefore to the appropriate equipment standard. W/U ratios for all other combinations have been derived using RA's Net Filter Discrimination (NFD) spreadsheet. However, where the established W/U ratios, defined in earlier assignment criteria, are lower than those obtained using the filter discrimination methodology, those values have been retained.
Important Notes:
Click [here] to view Tables B1 to B14
![]()
Annex C: Normal Assignment Process Flow Diagram
Click [here] to view Annex C
![]()
Annex D: High-Level Flow Diagram for Recommendation ITU-R P.452
Click [here] to view Annex D
![]()
Annex E: UK Rain Rates in mm/hr for 99.99% Availability by National Grid Square
Click [here] to view Annex E
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RA
406 JUNE 2003 |