![]() |
Interim SE19 Meeting, 17-18th October 2000 |
Delegate Report
The meeting covered the following key area of interest to the BFWA section activities:
Frequency Allocation Plans for the 40GHz band.
Frequency Allocation Plans for 40GHz.
A drafting group continued work on the draft framework for a Recommendation for frequency plans for the 40GHz band. The meeting fully reviewed the following parts of the working document:
Recommendation
Annex 1 - Principals and guideline steps
Annex 3 - Framework frequency grid.
Annex 4 - Frequency Block Edge Mask
Annex 5 - Inter-operator co-ordination
Annex 6 - MWS Technologies
Note: Annex 2 - Frequency Slot Plan, attracted no comment and can be considered stable.
Detailed Discussions
Recommendation:
The group reviewed the current text and editorial contributions from the UK
covering the MWS introduction, the considerings and the recommends.
The text is now reasonably stable although minor issues and final tweaks of
the text may occur at subsequent meetings. No further substantive changes are
anticipated.
Annex 1:
The group reviewed the current text and editorial contributions from the UK.
This section provides guidance for administrations on the steps to be followed
to facilitate a frequency assignment plan for the band. Considerable discussion
was had on the issue of defining specific uplink or downlink bands and duplex
spacing for both symmetric and asymmetric assignments. These issues are likely
to be addressed further at the next meeting. Apart from these issues , the text
is reasonably stable.
Annex 3:
The group reviewed the current text and editorial contributions from the UK,
Norway, Italy and Germany that sought to expand on the bullet points identified
at the last meeting. As before considerable discussion centred on the issue
of duplex spacing particularly for asymmetric assignments. The document contains
two options that need resolving at the next meeting. These options amount to
spacing between uplink and downlink blocks of either at least 500MHz or 1000MHz.
The impact of either choice needs further evaluation. The term "super block"
was renamed "framework" in order to disassociate with assigned frequency blocks.
Annex 4:
This is a difficult section that remains unresolved. There is a desire to define
a block edge emission mask rather than "explicit guard bands" to minimise operator
co-operation. This issue is strongly linked to the similar work of TM4 that
is writing the 40GHz MWS co-existence standard. Substantive input is expected
for the next meeting and "worst case" scenarios are defined for study (i.e narrowest
channels/widest channels, FDD/TDD systems).
Annex 5:
The group reviewed the current text and editorial contributions from the UK
and Germany that sought to expand on the bullet points identified at the last
meeting. The power flux density limits for cross boundary co-ordination were
examined and agreed subject to any other input. The group agreed that with a
"hard" boundary emission limit there was no need to add any distance trigger.
Text was amended accordingly and updated to explain better the derivation of
the PFD limit.
Annex 6:
The group discussed contributions
from ETSI BRAN and from Italy. The BRAN input was used to update the HIPERACCESS
information in the Annex. The contribution from Italy described MWS systems
based upon Cable modem standards. This was agreed as a useful input for inclusion
in this Technologies Annex.
Outstanding Issues
In order to complete this work the following issues require resolution and input
contribution:
Clarification of the impact of Radio Astronomy services on access to the top
1GHz of the band. This is important to assess the need to specify alternative
duplex spacings if the exclusion from use of the top 1GHz is extensive. This
impacts both symmetric and asymmetric FDD systems.
Proposals are required for the block edge mask.This
will depend on studies to be undertaken examining the worst case adjacent frequency
block issues.
The next SE19 main meeting is scheduled for 14-16th November 2000.
Barry Lewis
18th October 2000
![]()
| BFWATG(00)51 |