Access key 0 - Accessibility, Access key 2 - Jump to content, Access key 7 - Jump to navigation
Skip To Content | Skip To Navigation
 

Home > Telecoms > Implementation of BT's Undertakings > Telecoms Review impact


Evaluating the impact of the Telecoms Review

Summary

1.1 On 22 September 2005, Ofcom published a statement setting out its conclusions from its Strategic Review of Telecommunications (Telecoms Review) and accepting undertakings offered by British Telecommunications plc (BT) in lieu of a reference under Part 4 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (the Undertakings). The Undertakings were aimed at delivering equality of access to BT’s enduring economic bottlenecks in order to provide a platform for effective and sustainable deep level infrastructure competition, and hence to deliver the benefits of competition and innovation to UK consumers and businesses.

1.2 Over the last year BT has started to implement these Undertakings, with involvement from Ofcom and industry. This report is an evaluation of the impact of the Telecoms Review on the fixed telecoms market to date. This report is intended primarily as a review for industry stakeholders. A document looking more widely at consumers’ experiences will be published next month.

1.3 Our key conclusions are described below.

1.4 BT has shown itself committed to the delivery of the Undertakings. It has expended an enormous amount of effort and resource in implementing them. Achievements include:

1.5 However, the actual implementation, particularly of equivalence, has raised a number of issues, for instance in the way in which equivalence was applied and the quality of the equivalence management platform used to deliver equivalence. In addition, during the implementation of the Undertakings over the last 12 months, service performance across a range of wholesale products has at times been poor, and promised improvements have not always been fully delivered, or maintained. Whilst service performance is not strictly an Undertakings obligation it is still very relevant to this report into the impact of the Telecoms Review, since it significantly affects the ability for effective and sustainable competition to develop. It’s important to note, however, that most of these operational issues affect BT’s downstream divisions, as well as external communications providers, and therefore, BT has an incentive as a result of equality of access, to address these issues.

1.6 Many of the initial issues have, we believe, been identified and have either been resolved or there is a process to achieve resolution. The areas where we believe further progress is required are:

1.7 There is clearly a significant amount of work still to do both in terms of addressing outstanding issues as well as on the delivery of upcoming milestones. Ofcom will remain focussed on working with Openreach, BT and other industry participants to ensure successful delivery.

1.8 In terms of the impact the Undertakings are having on industry, there are indications of increasing infrastructure-based competition in broadband and fixed voice markets, resulting in greater choice and improved pricing for consumers. This can be attributed in part to the outcome of the Telecoms Review. However, there are fewer signs of developments in services based on fibre (e.g. little growth in take-up of partial private circuits).

1.9 Ofcom remains fully committed to the Undertakings and its strategy for regulating fixed line telecoms. We continue to believe the Undertakings have the potential to encourage further sustainable competition, more services, lower prices and greater consumer choice.

1.10 The key objectives of the Telecoms Review, and progress achieved against them to date, are summarised below. There are three broad areas we cover: whether the Undertakings have been effectively implemented; whether the Undertakings is helping to deliver more effective and sustainable competition; and the impact on consumers.

Effective implementation of the Undertakings

1.11 Effective implementation requires BT, at a minimum, to comply with the Undertakings that it has committed to. This includes meeting the milestones laid out in the Undertakings, for example on operational separation and ‘Equivalence of Inputs’ dates, and on-going compliance. Furthermore, there is an expectation that BT should deliver the broader intention of the Undertakings to achieve equality of access to BT’s infrastructure for BT’s competitors, particularly through appropriate organisational behaviour.

1.12 A key element of the Undertakings was the establishment of Openreach. Openreach was established on time and Ofcom and other stakeholders have generally been impressed by the enthusiasm and commitment of its senior management.

1.13 However, there were some early problems. Some of these have been resolved - for instance, the Customer Business Management function is now fully resourced and communications providers have account managers and a WES repair function in Openreach has been created. Of continuing concern is the poor service performance for key Openreach products such as BES and LLU provisioning and repair, and co-mingling delivery.

1.14 A number of key dates relating to achieving equivalence of inputs have now passed, and on each occasion BT has stated that it delivered ready for service equivalence of inputs as required.

1.15 Nonetheless, Ofcom has expressed some concerns regarding these deliveries in its quarterly implementation reports – for example, we are concerned about the number of significant updates and downtime of the equivalence management platform used for LLU that were necessary after 30 June 2006, requiring, in some cases, significant outages.

1.16 BT has met its commitment to publishing quarterly key performance indicator (KPI) reports. While the data show the absolute level of service delivery differs substantially by product, they also suggest external communication providers often get a different service level to BT itself, but the service is not systematically better or worse.

1.17 The Undertakings set a framework for the development of network access for BT’s Next Generation Network (NGN – referred to as 21CN). While BT continues to be committed to its investment in 21CN, some communication providers are concerned over the Consult 21 process and the level of influence they have over it. BT is continuing to try and improve the process to reduce the resource burden on communication providers, and the establishment of NGNuk, which BT committed to in its Undertakings, is expected to be a positive step in this regard.

1.18 The Equality of Access Board (EAB) was established on 1 November 2005, ahead of time, and published its first annual report in May 2006.

1.19 Ofcom believes the EAB is a valuable organisation capable of effectively monitoring the implementation of the Undertakings and dealing with complaints from communication providers. Industry stakeholders also see the potential value of such an organisation. While we believe the EAB has made a good start, we also recognise that it has not been fully tested yet.

Achieving effective and sustainable competition

1.20 There are a number of outcomes Ofcom has identified, which assess the extent to which Ofcom’s regulatory approach is creating the conditions for effective and sustainable competition and the right incentives for timely and efficient investment.

1.21 Take-up of wholesale products provides one indicator of the degree of competition in the market. For copper-based products (primarily used to provide services to the residential and Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) markets), wholesale take-up has continued to grow. Take-up of LLU has increased to 0.85 million by the end of September 2006, and appears to be on track to reach 1.5 million lines in the first few months of 2007, and the proportion of end users served by an LLU exchange now exceeds 50%. The Telecoms Review particularly aimed to encourage investment deep in the network and in this context the take-up of LLU is considered a particularly important indicator.

1.22 For fibre-based products (typically leased lines used for business applications), however, progress has been relatively slow. Access products such as Wholesale Extension Service Access (WESA) and Traditional Interface Leased Line Access Product (TILLAP), which will allow deeper infrastructure based competition are not available yet, although there has been some progress towards product development.

1.23 Merit-based deregulation was an important element of the TSR strategy. The objective was to ensure that as competition took hold, ex ante regulation was withdrawn leaving the market to determine outcomes. The degree to which Ofcom determines there is a case for deregulation depends upon the development of sustainable competition. Over the last year, Ofcom has conducted, or is the process of conducting, a number of market reviews. We have de-regulated where it is justified and begun to put in place clear frameworks that will allow appropriate de-regulation going forward as competition develops.

A well-functioning telecoms market

1.24 Better experiences for citizens and consumers are the ultimate goal of all Ofcom’s regulation. We are still at an early stage for measuring the impact of the Telecoms Review on final market outcomes for citizens and consumers. While the impact of the findings of the Telecoms Review is difficult to measure directly, nonetheless, it is expected that Ofcom’s new approach to regulation will influence the way the market develops and experiences for consumers and businesses.

1.25 The data presented suggest:

1.26 However, there are also areas where there is a need for improvement:

1.27 Ofcom is also planning to publish the following documents, which will look in more detail at consumer experiences:

Next steps

1.28 Ofcom will continue proactively to scrutinise the ongoing delivery of the Undertakings and address issues that arise to help ensure a robust environment for the development of effective and sustainable competition. In parallel, we will continue to work on related areas such as BT exemptions from specified Undertakings and MIS separation.

1.29 Ofcom intends to continue to publish quarterly implementation reports providing information on BT’s progress towards implementation of its Undertakings. It is our expectation that we will also publish further evaluation reports like this one at appropriate points.

1.30 Ofcom considers that the Undertakings remain an appropriate and comprehensive solution to its competition concerns laid out in its Telecoms Strategic Review. We intend to continue to pursue full implementation of BT’s commitments.

1.31 Should you wish to discuss this report, or have comments on it, please contact Sarah Evans on 020 7981 3761, or via e-mail to: sarah.evans@ofcom.org.uk.

The full document is available below:



Back to top Back to top

Related Items

 

 

 Accessibility tools