Dispute between: (i) TalkTalk Telecom Group PLC (“TTG”) and (ii) Openreach (a BT Group business) concerning whether Openreach offered MPF New Provide to TTG on fair and reasonable terms and conditions.
Case opened: 10 January 2013.
Case closed: 15 August 2013
Issue: Ofcom was asked to resolve this dispute under section 185 of the Communications Act 2003 (the Act).
Relevant instrument: Ofcom resolved this dispute using its powers under Chapter 3 of Part 2 of the Act.
On 15 August 2013, Ofcom issued a final determination resolving this dispute. A non-confidential version of the determination is available under related items.
Update note: 28 May 2013
Ofcom received four submissions in response to its first provisional conclusions issued on 27 March 2013. We have substantially changed our provisional conclusion in light of new information provided by the Parties. We therefore consider it appropriate to extend the timetable for the dispute resolution process in order to issue revised provisional conclusions and allow interested parties the opportunity to consider and respond to Ofcom’s revised proposals.
On 28 May 2013, Ofcom issued its second provisional conclusions concerning this dispute to BT and TalkTalk (please see related item).
The period for comments on the provisional conclusions will close at 5 pm on Tuesday 11 June 2013. Please send responses to:
2A Southwark Bridge Road
Or by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
End of update note
Update note: 27 March 2013
On 27 March 2013, Ofcom issued its provisional conclusions concerning this dispute to BT and TalkTalk (please see related item).
The period for comments on the provisional conclusions will close at 5 pm on Thursday 11 April 2013. Please send responses to:
2A Southwark Bridge Road
Or by e-mail to email@example.com
End of update note
BT is subject to regulatory obligations in relation to LLU services pursuant to conditions imposed under section 45 of the Act, including a requirement to provide LLU services (including MPF New Provide) on fair and reasonable terms and conditions.
This dispute concerns the level of service provided by Openreach (a BT Group business) for MPF New Provides.
MPFs (metallic path facilities) are BT’s copper lines between the local telephone exchanges and the customer premises. These can be rented by other communications providers (“CPs”) to connect to their own networks and provide broadband and voice services to end users.
MPF New Provide is the LLU service where Openreach provides a new line for a CP (rather than, for example, where the CP takes over an existing line).
When an order is placed with Openreach for it to supply MPF New Provide, Openreach offers its wholesale customer appointment dates for an Openreach engineer site visit to install the product.
TTG submits that during the period 1 June to 31 August 2012 (“the relevant period”), the average time taken for Openreach to provide appointment availability increased significantly such that the level of service provided was not acceptable. TTG argues that the terms and conditions pursuant to which this service was supplied were not fair and reasonable on the basis that compensation should have been payable where the level of service provided fell below acceptable levels.
Openreach argues that TTG is not entitled to compensation.
TTG and Openreach have failed to agree on whether TTG should be paid compensation by Openreach. TTG therefore referred the matter to Ofcom in December 2012.
Ofcom recognises that on the face of the referral, there appears to be a dispute between the parties that commercial negotiations have failed to resolve. In resolving disputes, Ofcom must act in a manner which is consistent with both Ofcom’s general duties under section 3 of the Act, and pursuant to section 4(1)(c) of the Act, the six Community requirements set out in section 4 of the Act which give effect, amongst other things, to Article 8 of the Framework Directive.
In summary, those requirements are:
Ofcom considers that there is a dispute between the parties within the meaning of s185(1A) of the Communications Act 2003. Ofcom considers that the dispute meets the relevant statutory criteria and it is appropriate for Ofcom to handle it according to section 186 of the Act, and accordingly, Ofcom has accepted the dispute for resolution.
Scope of the dispute:
After consideration of the submissions received from TTG and Openreach, the scope of the dispute is to determine:
whether Openreach offered MPF New Provide to TalkTalk Telecom Group PLC over the period 1 June 2012 to 31 August 2012 on fair and reasonable terms and conditions as required under Condition FAA9.2; and any appropriate exercise by Ofcom of its powers under section 190(2) of the Communications Act 2003 as part of Ofcom’s determination resolving this dispute.
In line with Ofcom’s Guidance on the resolution of disputes published in June 2011, Ofcom is not consulting on the scope of this dispute. Ofcom’s guidelines can be found at: Ofcom's Guidelines for the handling of regulatory disputes.
Stakeholders interested in the outcome of this dispute should notify Ofcom by 25 January 2013, describing the relevance of the outcome of this dispute to their business. Stakeholders with relevant information and evidence in respect of this dispute should submit this to Ofcom by 25 January 2013.
Stakeholders who wish Ofcom to join them as parties to the dispute must provide evidence, as set out in Ofcom's Guidelines, that they are in dispute.
Case Leader: Costas Pittas (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Case Reference: CW/01098/12/12