Complainant: VIP Communications Ltd (‘VIP’)
Complaint against: T-Mobile Ltd (‘T-Mobile’)
Case opened: 1 December 2004
Case closed: 28 June 2005
Issue: Following the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s judgment in Floe Telecom Limited (in administration) v Office of Communications (Case No. 1024/2/3/04) of 19 November, Ofcom undertook to reinvestigate the complaint submitted by VIP on 22 July 2003. Ofcom's investigation assessed whether T-Mobile infringed Section 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (‘the Chapter II prohibition’) and/or Article 82 of the EC Treaty by disconnecting telecommunications services it was providing to VIP and by continuing to refuse to supply VIP, while allegedly continuing to supply the same services to other companies operating GSM gateways.
Relevant Instrument: Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998 (abuse of a dominant position) and Article 82 of the EC Treaty
Ofcom has concluded that T-Mobile has not infringed the Chapter II prohibition or Article 82 of the EC Treaty by suspending/disconnecting the services it was providing to VIP for use in VIP’s GSM gateways, while allegedly continuing to supply the same services to other companies for use in GSM gateways. There are therefore no grounds for action against T-Mobile.
A non-confidential version of the decision is available at the link below.
Update note - 3 March 2005
On 3 March 2005 Ofcom published a statement on certain issues relevant to this investigation.
Please see the related item.
Ofcom is seeking the views of interested parties on any of the matters discussed in this statement until 5pm on 31 March 2005.
Please send responses to:Robert MacDougall
On 22 July 2003 VIP submitted a complaint to Oftel and Oftel opened an investigation (further details can be found at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/competition-bulletins/closed-cases/all-closed-cases/cw_662/). Oftel issued a non-infringement decision on 22 December 2003 http://www.ofcom.org.uk/bulletins/comp_bull_index/comp_bull_ccases/closed_all/cw_662/vip_com.pdf). Following the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s judgment (http://www.catribunal.org.uk/documents/Jdg1024Floe011204.pdf) Ofcom has undertaken to reinvestigate the complaint.
GSM Gateways are devices containing one or more Subscriber Identity Modules ('SIMs') for one or more mobile networks, which enable calls from fixed phones to mobile networks to be routed via a GSM link into the relevant mobile network. VIP employed GSM Gateways to provide discounted mobile termination to UK companies. VIP has stated that during January/February 2003 T-Mobile suspended the SIMs that it had provided to VIP.
Under section 25 of the Competition Act 1998, Ofcom may conduct an investigation if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the Chapter II prohibition and/or Article 82 of the EC Treaty have been infringed. In light of Ofcom’s market review statement “Wholesale Mobile Voice Call Termination” (http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/mobile_call_termination/) Ofcom has reasonable grounds to believe that T-Mobile may be dominant in the supply of wholesale mobile voice call termination on its own network.
Ofcom’s investigation will assess whether T-Mobile has abused a dominant position by disconnecting the SIMs used in VIP's GSM Gateways and by continuing to refuse to supply VIP with SIMs for use in GSM Gateways. Ofcom will also assess whether T-Mobile acted in a discriminatory manner by refusing to supply VIP with SIMs, while allegedly continuing to supply such services to other companies that operated GSM Gateways. In carrying out its investigation, Ofcom will take into account the judgment of the Competition Appeal Tribunal of 19 November 2004 and, in particular, the factors set out in paragraphs 287, 338 and 339 of that judgment.
As part of this investigation, Ofcom anticipates that it will issue a statement setting out Ofcom’s view on the interpretation of the current Wireless Telegraphy Act licences, in particular whether licensees such as T-Mobile can authorise the commercial use of GSM Gateways under their licence. Ofcom will issue this statement in due course, and will seek the views of interested parties on that statement.
Case Leader: Robert MacDougall e-mail:Robert.Macdougall@ofcom.org.uk
Case reference: CW/00806/12/04