Helping people to shop around and secure the right deal
Ofcom has today announced a new initiative to make it easier for communications customers to get better deals.
We want more people to shop around with confidence and take full advantage of the wide choice of competitive phone, broadband and pay-TV services on offer.
This means helping people identify and secure the best deals for their needs and budgets – whether by agreeing a new deal with their current provider, or finding an alternative one with a different provider.
Ofcom research shows that the proportion of ‘engaged’ consumers – those who have actively switched, shopped around, or negotiated in the last two years – varies significantly across communication markets.
This chart shows how engaged consumers are, based on four categories, across different services.1 For example, just 7% of consumers taking landline telephone services on their own are ‘engaged’, compared to 39% for people that bundle landline, broadband and pay-TV services together.
As we explained in our Pricing Trends report in March, we are concerned that less-engaged consumers may be paying higher prices, as providers often target their best offers and discounts at those who negotiate or switch.2
Today’s call for inputs explores how to help less-engaged customers to access the most cost-effective deals for their needs. It complements other Ofcom initiatives to protect more vulnerable people who are less likely to switch – including plans announced earlier this year to cut monthly bills by at least £5 a month for BT customers that have only a landline.
Breaking down barriers to engagement
Ofcom has today outlined three potential reasons why some people fail to shop around, and possible measures to address them.
1. Ease of leaving current service or provider: some contract terms may deter people from switching. For example, when people take more than one service from their provider, companies may impose different contract end-dates for each one. This could mean consumers need to pay a charge to exit one of their services early, or delay switching until the later contract ends.
Possible action: we are considering whether information about exit terms or contract lengths currently provided to consumers at the start of a contract is sufficiently clear. An alternative solution could be to require that all elements of a bundle have the same contract end-date. We are also assessing whether handset locking practices dissuade or delay people from changing mobile provider.
2. Confusion about when to engage: people may not be fully aware of when to review their existing deal. Many consumers allow contracts to ‘roll over’ after the minimum term expires,2 when they could have saved money by switching or renegotiating their contract.
Possible action: we are considering whether consumer engagement could be improved if providers were to prompt customers by informing them that their contract is coming to an end.
3. Uncertainty about services and needs: some people may lack confidence identifying a deal or package that meets their needs. They might be uncertain about their usage requirements, or struggle to understand the range of tariffs available. These customers may end up paying higher prices for deals which exceed their actual needs. Similarly, people who underestimate their use may receive unexpectedly high bills, having exceeded their monthly voice or data allowance.
Possible action: we are examining whether pricing information could be presented on a more comparable basis. We are also exploring if consumers should be given details about their current service and personal usage in a standard format, so they can identify and compare offers more effectively.
Over the next two months, Ofcom is inviting views from the public, consumer groups and companies on barriers to customers participating in the market, and is planning further consumer research.
Having considered the results and wider feedback, we expect to announce any next steps for increasing engagement in Spring next year.
We then intend to conduct ‘real-world’ trials of possible measures to test how effective they are in changing people’s behaviour.
Lindsey Fussell, Ofcom’s Consumer Group Director said: “We want to help telecoms and TV customers take full advantage of the products and deals out there.
“Too many people are deterred from shopping around, often staying on contracts that don’t suit their needs. So we plan to make things easier, by breaking down the barriers that prevent customers from engaging in the communications market.”
Switching between Openreach, KCOM, Virgin Media and Sky
Last year, we outlined proposals for a process where customers switching landline, broadband or pay-TV services between different networks might only need to contact the provider they were moving to, who would then coordinate the switch on their behalf. There is already a similar process in place for landline and broadband customers who switch within the Openreach network.
Having carefully considered all of the evidence, we have decided that it would not be proportionate and justified to make changes to the process for switching services between Openreach, KCOM, Virgin Media and Sky.
In reaching our decision, we’ve taken into account the amount it would cost industry providers to implement our proposed changes, and the benefits to consumers.3
We’ve concluded that the costs are significantly higher than originally estimated, and consider that pursuing our proposed changes would not be in consumers’ best interests at this time.4
We are now focused on addressing the wider problems that consumers face outside the formal switching process, and will aim to remove any barriers preventing customers from getting a better deal.
Notes to editors
- Source: Ofcom Switching Tracker carried out by Saville Rossiter-Base in July to August 2016
Inactive: people least likely to have had past involvement in the market. They may have switched, considered or negotiated, but not in the last two years. These consumers tend to say they have no interest in changing provider.
Passive: more likely than ‘inactive’ consumers to have switched, considered or negotiated a deal, but not in the last two years. These consumers indicate some current interest in the market, such as saying they are open to the idea of a new provider.
Interested: broadly similar to ‘passive’ consumers in past behaviour, but they may have shopped around previously. This group is more likely than ‘passive’ consumers to be open to the idea of a new provider.
Engaged: these are people who have been the most active in switching, considering, shopping around or negotiating over the last two years, and who are also interested now in what the market has to offer. They may be actively looking for a new deal, or open to the idea of a new provider.
- 87% of landline-only consumers, 78% of pay-TV-only consumers, 42% of dual play consumers, and 43% of triple play consumers were found to be outside their minimum contract period last year. (See Ofcom’s Pricing trends for communications services in the UK 2016).
- We estimate the costs to industry to implement our proposed reforms would be around £110m over ten years. We have also considered that these increased costs might lead to higher prices, or reduce operators’ ability to invest in their networks and quality of service.
- In reaching our decision, we have also taken account of the fact that our proposed reforms would only benefit two fifths of landline, broadband and/or pay-TV switchers. In addition, other interventions proposed since publishing our consultation - such as automatic compensation – may help reduce loss of service for people switching services between networks. Further, there is evidence to suggest that factors outside the formal switching process may be preventing or hindering consumers from engaging in communications markets. Our work on increasing consumers’ engagement will look at these.