|

Issue
3
December
2000
This document is
also available in pdf format. To view the document in pdf you
will need to have Adobe Acrobat Reader
If you already have
Adobe Acrobat Reader you can download the document - data1200.pdf
immediately.
Contents
Introduction
Complaints
information published
How Oftel deals with consumer
complaints
Complaints to telecoms companies
Reporting
period covered
Other information available to
consumers
Further
publication of complaints data
Contacting
Oftel
TABLE
A: Top 10 complaints for the period 1 April 2000 to 30 September 2000
TABLE
B: Top five companies most complained about
Information
to Note
Introduction
Oftels
goal is for consumers to have the best possible deal in terms of quality,
choice and value for money. When deciding which telecoms company best
meets their requirements, consumers need to be able to compare the performance
of alternative companies. This will help them make informed decisions
about the choices available to them.
As
part of this process, every six months Oftel publishes details on the
complaints made by the public to Oftel about individual telecoms companies.
The problems that are occurring, which companies are involved, and the
action they are taking to deal with them is useful information for consumers
wanting to compare the performance of telecoms companies. Consumers
and consumer bodies welcome Oftel's publication of this information.
Oftel
believes that publishing this information also provides an important
incentive to telecoms companies to address quickly the cause of the
complaints made against them.
This
publication should not be seen as a survey on the performance
of companies customer complaints services. Information on this
is regularly published by the industry in their Comparable Performance
Indicators.
Complaints
information published
The
information published relates to the number and type of complaints Oftel
has received from consumers about telecoms companies. A complaint is
defined as a consumer's expression of dissatisfaction.
Table
A - lists the top ten complaints that consumers have raised and
the main telecoms companies complained about. Companies are ranked by
the number of complaints received.
Table
B - lists the top five companies that consumers have complained
to Oftel about. The table is ranked by the number of complaints received
divided by the companys customer base.
Full
details of the criteria for inclusion in these tables is set out below.
How Oftel deals with consumer
complaints
Oftel
always takes complaints about telecoms companies seriously. We advise
consumers about the options available to them to resolve any dispute,
and will often take up their complaint with the company concerned. Oftel
also holds regular meetings with companies to discuss consumers
complaints and the action the company is taking to deal with service
problems. A large number of complaints about a company could mean there
is a serious problem that requires regulatory action by Oftel.
Consumers rightly
expect their telecoms company to have an efficient and effective customer
complaints procedure, so that their complaint is dealt with swiftly
and effectively. In many cases, Oftel received less than one complaint
for each 10,000 customers of the company concerned. Nearly all the companies
have set out what action they have already taken or intend to take to
deal with the complaints listed.

Complaints to telecoms companies
The
information published does not cover the complaints made directly to
telecoms companies. Individual companies receive complaints directly
from their customers, but if they deal with them to the customers
satisfaction, people are unlikely to also complain to Oftel. Most consumers
complain to Oftel only when they are unhappy with the response they
have received from their telecoms company, and are seeking advice or
assistance from Oftel.
Companies with less than
10,000 customers
Oftel
received no responses concerning its decision to exclude companies with
less than 10,000 customers and this is now included in the criteria
for inclusion in the publication.
Reporting
period covered
The
information on complaints received by Oftel covers the period 1 April
2000 to 30 September 2000. Oftels complaint handling system
records the number of consumers contacting Oftel and the number of issues
raised by consumers. 52,000 consumers made complaints on a wide range
of issues to Oftel or the regional Advisory Committees on Telecommunications
during this period.
Oftel
also received 14,000 enquiries about a wide range of telecoms issues.
In addition there were 280 consumer complaints about how Oftel handled
their complaint or about Oftels policy on particular telecoms
issues.
Oftel
received 1,500 complaints about Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
In addition, as can be seen from the tables, a number of telecoms companies
offer Internet Access packages in partnership with ISPs. Given the difficulty
of obtaining accurate customer base information for ISPs at this time,
Oftel will not be including ISPs in the tables.
Other information available to
consumers
Information
on the number of complaints made to Oftel is only one aspect of a telecoms
companys performance. Additional information on the performance
of telecoms companies is available from a number of other sources. These
include:
- quality of service
Comparable Performance Indicators (CPIs) (www.cpi.org.uk),
- telephone bill
comparisons, for example at www.phonebills.org.uk, and
- individual company
literature which will detail services and tariff packages.
Used
together, these can help consumers decide which company best suits their
requirements.
In
addition, local authority trading standards departments and environmental
health offices, and other local advisory agencies, submit quarterly
returns on a voluntary basis to the Office of Fair Trading which publishes
consumer complaint figures on its web site at www.oft.gov.uk/html/rsearch/stats
However, these figures do not name individual companies.
Further
publication of complaints data
The
next publication, covering the period 1 October 2000 to 31 March 2001
is due for publication in May 2001.
Contacting
Oftel
Oftel
has a dedicated section on its website to help
deal with consumer enquiries. A consumer helpline service is also available.
If
a consumer has a complaint about a telecoms company, Oftel recommend
they contact their telecoms company and try and resolve the problem.
If they have been through all the companys complaints procedures
and the complaint has still not been resolved, consumers can contact
Oftel in the following ways:
Consumers resident
in England
Consumers resident
in Scotland
Contact the Scottish
Advisory Committee on Telecommunications (SACOT)
Consumers resident
in Wales
The Welsh Advisory
Committee on Telecommunications (WACT)
Consumers resident
in Northern Ireland
The Northern Ireland
Advisory Committee on Telecommunications (NIACT)
Calls to the helpline
may be monitored for training purposes.
Consumers are advised to check with their phone companies for local
rate tariff details.

TABLE
A: Top 10 complaints for the period 1 April 2000 to 30 September
2000
Notes:
Note
1: October 1999-March 2000 position in brackets
Note 2: MSP - Mobile Service Provider
|
Complaint
(see note 1 |
Total
Complaints
|
Companies
Complained About
|
| Company |
Number
of Complaints |
Per
10,000 Customers |
Company
Comment |
| 1 |
Complaint
ignored/ no action taken (1) |
3152 |
BT
|
1372
|
0.48
|
BT
The trial mentioned last time has now been written into all procedures.
A further comprehensive action plan has also been put in place covering
the whole complaints process. |
|
|
|
BT
Cellnet MSP |
541 |
0.71 |
BT
Cellnet MSP - see footnote |
|
|
|
Orange MSP |
186 |
0.26 |
Orange
A further reduction of more than 35% in the number of complaints
pre 10,000 customers is a significant improvement and clear evidence
that the additional improvments to Orange customer service are delivering
real benefits. |
|
|
|
One2One
MSP |
178 |
0.31 |
One2One
One 2 One is delighted by the reduction of over 55% in
complaints per 10,000 as we continue investing in custoemr services
with the opening of our 6th customer contact centre in 2001. |
| 2 |
Failure
/ time taken to repair |
2706 |
BT
|
2367
|
0.83
|
BT
BT has recruited additional resources, focussed on reducing
the fault rate and meeting peaks of work. However, the extreme
weather conditions have hampered progress. |
| 3 |
Difficulty
in contacting |
2636 |
BT
Cellnet MSP |
730 |
0.96
|
BT
Cellnet - see footnote |
|
|
|
BT |
694 |
0.24 |
BT
BT has continued to recruit people to its call centres
to answer an increasing volume of calls from its customers and is
focussed on meeting peaks of calls. |
|
|
|
NTL |
307 |
2.00 |
NTL
We are addressing call waiting times. We have introduced an
email complaints process and a national approach to services.
This will take time, but customers will see benefits soon. |
|
|
|
Orange
MSP |
146 |
0.20 |
Orange
MSP Orange is committed to providing the highest level of service
and has recently announced a new Customer Commmunication Centre
which will improve our customers' experience in contacting Orange. |
|
|
|
World
Online |
139 |
21.55 |
World
Online - no comment received |
| 4 |
Compensation
matters (9) |
2136 |
BT
|
1440
|
0.50
|
BT
BT is committed to ensuring its Custoemr Service Guarantee Scheme
is correctly applied to eligible claims. Improved system tools
are in development to be effective by the year end. |
|
|
|
BT
Cellnet MSP
|
148 |
0.20 |
BT
Cellnet MSP see footnote |
| 5 |
Customer
not kept informed (-) |
2035 |
BT
|
906 |
0.32
|
BT
This area is linked to the new action plan mentioned in 1.
In addition, BT has just begun a detailed refresher training programme
for all Call Centre Management personnel |
|
|
|
BT
Cellnet MSP |
338 |
0.45 |
BT
Cellnet MSP - see footnote |
| 6 |
Letters
not answered (4) |
1972 |
BT
|
650
|
023
|
BT
All correspondence received by the front end is handled by one
site, who decide the most appropriate course of action. This
process is constantly under review to ensure best practice |
|
|
|
BT
Cellnet MSP |
423 |
0.56 |
BT
Cellnet MSP - see footnote |
|
|
|
Orange
MSP
|
107 |
0.15 |
Orange
MSP Orange is delighted to note the substantial improvement
shown by a reduction of over 55% in the number of complaints per
10,000 customers which is a reflection of process improvements undertaken
in this area |
| 7 |
Charged
for cancelled service (5) |
1852 |
BT
Cellnet MSP
|
492
|
0.65
|
BT
Cellnet MSP - see footnote |
|
|
|
Cellular
Operations & First Line |
284 |
58.05 |
Cellular
Operations - no comment received |
|
|
|
BT
|
191 |
0.07 |
BT
- BT's policy is to ensure cancellation charges are
explained to customers before they are raised. When mistakes
arise BT will correct the charge and apologise to the customer |
|
|
|
Orange
MSP |
144 |
0.20 |
Orange
MSP Orange is pleased to note the fall by more than 35% in the
number of complaints per 10,000 customers. We are continually
reviewing our processes to further improve customer satisfaction
in this area. |
|
|
|
One
2 ONe MSP |
110 |
0.19 |
One2One
One 2 One is delighted by the reduction of over 60% in
complaints per 10,000 as we continue to invest in our Customer Care
& Billing System to improve billing quality and service to our
customers |
|
|
|
Singlepoint
(4U) |
101 |
1.64 |
Singlepoint
(4U) as call charges are billed in arrears, customers will therefore
receive a final invoice following disconnection, if their mobile
telephone usage exceeds the allocation of free talk time. |
|
|
|
Vodafone |
96 |
0.12 |
Vodafone
- declined to comment |
| 8 |
Total
loss of service (7) |
1785 |
BT
|
1120
|
0.39
|
BT
BT is continuing in its investment to improve the resilience
of its network infrastructure. Progress has been hampered
by the bad weather |
|
|
|
BT
Cellnet MSP |
244 |
0.32 |
BT
Cellnet MSP - see footnote |
| 9 |
Problems
with apparatus/systems |
1519 |
BT
|
341
|
0.12
|
BT
BT seeks to ensure that any apparatus problems are rectified and
customer comments are fed back to incoporate into manufacturing
and development processes |
|
|
|
BT
Cellnet MSP |
307 |
0.40 |
BT
Cellnet MSP - see footnote |
|
|
|
Orange
MSP |
235 |
0.33
|
Orange
MSP Orange has introduced a specialist analysis team to
review both internal processes and to feed back customer concerns
to the manufacturers, thereby improving equipment quality for our
customers |
|
|
|
One2One
MSP |
149 |
0.26 |
One
2 One MSP One 2 One is encouraged by the reduction of over 35%
in complaints per 10,000 customers. We continue to work with
handset manufacturers to improve the quality of equipment to our
customers |
| 10 |
Problems
obtaining refunds |
1480 |
BT
Cellnet MSP
|
447
|
0.59
|
BT
Cellnet - See footnote |
|
|
|
BT |
274 |
0.10 |
BT
BT's policy is to refund customers when we make
a mistake. Additional training and coaching has been carried
out and alterations in BT's systems/processes in November should
help |
|
|
|
Orange
MSP |
124 |
0.17 |
Orange
MSP The reduction in the number of complaints per 10,000
customers of over 20% shows the clear benefits of our automated
refund process. Orange is committed to continue to improve this
process |
|
|
|
One
2 One MSP |
108 |
0.19 |
One2One
A reduction of over 50% in complaints per 10,000 customers once
again reinforces One2One's commitment to the continuous improvment
in our customer service operations |
Footnote:
BT Cellnet's commnet: BT Cellnet continues to invest heavily in its
customer service. Resources are focussed to address key issues
in order to improve the level of service to our customers.

TABLE
B: Top five companies most complained about (complaints data is
weighted by the telecoms companys customer base) for the period
1 April 2000 to 30 September 2000
Notes:
Note 1:
October 1999-March 2000 position in brackets
| |
Company |
Complaints
|
Top
3 complaints against company |
Company
comment |
| Total |
Per
10,000 customers |
| 1 |
Cellular
Operations & First Line (3) |
1314
|
268.6
|
1.
charged for cancelled service
2. problems with credit agencies/blacklisting
3. difficulty in contacting |
No
comments received |
| 2 |
NextCall
(2) |
661
|
194.4
|
1.
complaint ignored/no action taken
2. charge relates to old billing period
3. bill(s) not arrived |
no
comments received |
| 3 |
World
Online (1) |
1137
|
176.3
|
1.
difficulty in contacting
2. changes to internet access tariffs
3. complaint ignore/no action taken |
no
comments received |
| 4 |
Quip
& LineOne (-) |
502 |
66.5
|
1.
changes to internet access tariffs
2. difficulty in contacting
3. problems obtaining refunds |
Quip
These figures relate to the withdrawn internet offer from
LineOne, for which Quip only provided the telephony service.
Customer satisfaction for Quip's own service are 95%
LineOne no comments received |
| 5 |
WorldxChange
(-) |
144 |
22.8 |
1.
bills not arrived
2. letters not answered
3. difficulty in contacting |
Worldxchange
can confirm we have overcome all issues affecting late production
of bills. Recruitment and training within our call centre
has led to improved letter and call handling |

Information
to Note
Table
A Criteria
- Analysis
is based on number of issues raised by complainants - not number
of complainants
- No company
will be included if their customer base is less than 10,000
- No company
will be included if complaints relating to the company are less
than 50 or less than 5% of the total complaints about issue
- A complaint
is defined as consumer expression of dissatisfaction relating
to their telecoms company or a telecoms service
- Includes
business and residential customers
- Customer
base information is for 30 June 2000
- Complaints
per 10,000 customers will not be shown if a company does not
wish to make its customer base information public
- Complaints
about cable television are excluded
|
Table
B Criteria
As before,
except:
- No company
will be included if complaints relating to the company are less
than 100
Complaints
about Mobiles
Oftels
statement, Proposals for publishing information on complaints
received by Oftel, explained that calculation of the denominator
in the mobile market is slightly more complex than other areas
as complaints can either relate to a network or a service provider.
A separate calculation will be carried out for network complaints
and service provider complaints.
Oftel defines
"Network" as issues relating to coverage or reception
quality. Mobile companies, if included in the published data,
will therefore be listed in the following way:
BT Cellnet
(mobile network)
BT Cellnet (mobile service provision)
Dolphin (mobile network)
Dolphin (mobile service provision)
One2one (mobile network)
One2one (mobile service provision)
Orange (mobile network)
Orange (mobile service provision)
Vodafone (mobile network)
Vodafone (mobile service provider)
[Independent company] (mobile service
provision)
NTL &
Cable and Wireless Communications
On 30 May
2000 ntl took over parts of CWC. CWC cable customers and CWC residential
indirect access customers became customers of ntl after that date.
|
Until
the acquired parts of CWC became fully intergrated with ntl Oftel
has decided to split complaints received about CWC and ntl into
3 groups:
- ntl: existing
ntl cable and indirect access business
- CWC: up
to take overon 30 May: CWC CAble, CWC indirect access.
After 30 May - business only indirect access companies
- CWC now
ntl: upto take over 30 May: nothing, after 30 May, CWC cable,
CWC residential only indirect access customers
Company
comments
Oftel invited
the companies named in this publication to add their comments
if they wished. Oftel cannot vouch for the accuracy of of
any comments made by companies in this publication.
Independent
audit
An independent
audit of the process behind Oftel's publication of complaints
data was carried out by the company CMG UK Ltd in april 2000
Further
Information
Oftels
consumer pages can be found on its web site at:
www.Oftel.gov.uk/crs/index
Frequently
asked questions can be found at
www.Oftel.gov.uk/crs/faq
Complaints
statistics can be found at
www.Oftel.gov.uk/crs/statistics
|


|