Layout image
   
Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Consumer complaints made to Oftel Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image

illustration

Issue 3

December 2000

This document is also available in pdf format.  To view the document in pdf you will need to have Adobe Acrobat Reader illustration  

If you already have Adobe Acrobat Reader you can download the document - data1200.pdf immediately.


Contents

Introduction

Complaints information published

How Oftel deals with consumer complaints

Complaints to telecoms companies

Reporting period covered

Other information available to consumers

Further publication of complaints data

Contacting Oftel

TABLE A: Top 10 complaints for the period 1 April 2000 to 30 September 2000

TABLE B: Top five companies most complained about

Information to Note


Introduction

Oftel’s goal is for consumers to have the best possible deal in terms of quality, choice and value for money. When deciding which telecoms company best meets their requirements, consumers need to be able to compare the performance of alternative companies. This will help them make informed decisions about the choices available to them.

As part of this process, every six months Oftel publishes details on the complaints made by the public to Oftel about individual telecoms companies. The problems that are occurring, which companies are involved, and the action they are taking to deal with them is useful information for consumers wanting to compare the performance of telecoms companies. Consumers and consumer bodies welcome Oftel's publication of this information.

Oftel believes that publishing this information also provides an important incentive to telecoms companies to address quickly the cause of the complaints made against them.

This publication should not  be seen as a survey on the performance of companies’ customer complaints services. Information on this is regularly published by the industry in their Comparable Performance Indicators.

Complaints information published

The information published relates to the number and type of complaints Oftel has received from consumers about telecoms companies. A complaint is defined as a consumer's expression of dissatisfaction.

Table A - lists the top ten complaints that consumers have raised and the main telecoms companies complained about. Companies are ranked by the number of complaints received.

Table B - lists the top five companies that consumers have complained to Oftel about. The table is ranked by the number of complaints received divided by the company’s customer base.

Full details of the criteria for inclusion in these tables is set out below.

How Oftel deals with consumer complaints

Oftel always takes complaints about telecoms companies seriously. We advise consumers about the options available to them to resolve any dispute, and will often take up their complaint with the company concerned. Oftel also holds regular meetings with companies to discuss consumers’ complaints and the action the company is taking to deal with service problems. A large number of complaints about a company could mean there is a serious problem that requires regulatory action by Oftel.

Consumers rightly expect their telecoms company to have an efficient and effective customer complaints procedure, so that their complaint is dealt with swiftly and effectively. In many cases, Oftel received less than one complaint for each 10,000 customers of the company concerned. Nearly all the companies have set out what action they have already taken or intend to take to deal with the complaints listed.

contents


Complaints to telecoms companies

The information published does not cover the complaints made directly to telecoms companies. Individual companies receive complaints directly from their customers, but if they deal with them to the customer’s satisfaction, people are unlikely to also complain to Oftel. Most consumers complain to Oftel only when they are unhappy with the response they have received from their telecoms company, and are seeking advice or assistance from Oftel.

Companies with less than 10,000 customers

Oftel received no responses concerning its decision to exclude companies with less than 10,000 customers and this is now included in the criteria for inclusion in the publication.

Reporting period covered

The information on complaints received by Oftel covers the period 1 April 2000 to 30 September  2000. Oftel’s complaint handling system records the number of consumers contacting Oftel and the number of issues raised by consumers. 52,000 consumers made complaints on a wide range of issues to Oftel or the regional Advisory Committees on Telecommunications during this period.

Oftel also received 14,000 enquiries about a wide range of telecoms issues. In addition there were 280 consumer complaints about how Oftel handled their complaint or about Oftel’s policy on particular telecoms issues.

Oftel received 1,500 complaints about Internet Service Providers (ISPs).  In addition, as can be seen from the tables, a number of telecoms companies offer Internet Access packages in partnership with ISPs. Given the difficulty of obtaining accurate customer base information for ISPs at this time, Oftel will not be including ISPs in the tables.

Other information available to consumers

Information on the number of complaints made to Oftel is only one aspect of a telecoms company’s performance. Additional information on the performance of telecoms companies is available from a number of other sources. These include:

  • quality of service Comparable Performance Indicators (CPIs) (www.cpi.org.uk),
  • telephone bill comparisons, for example at www.phonebills.org.uk, and
  • individual company literature which will detail services and tariff packages.

Used together, these can help consumers decide which company best suits their requirements.

In addition, local authority trading standards departments and environmental health offices, and other local advisory agencies, submit quarterly returns on a voluntary basis to the Office of Fair Trading which publishes consumer complaint figures on its web site at www.oft.gov.uk/html/rsearch/stats However, these figures do not name individual companies.

Further publication of complaints data

The next publication, covering the period 1 October 2000 to 31 March 2001 is due for publication in May 2001.

Contacting Oftel

Oftel has a dedicated section on its website to help deal with consumer enquiries. A consumer helpline service is also available.

If a consumer has a complaint about a telecoms company, Oftel recommend they contact their telecoms company and try and resolve the problem. If they have been through all the company’s complaints procedures and the complaint has still not been resolved, consumers can contact Oftel in the following ways:

Consumers resident in England

Consumers resident in Scotland

Contact the Scottish Advisory Committee on Telecommunications (SACOT)

Consumers resident in Wales

The Welsh Advisory Committee on Telecommunications (WACT)

Consumers resident in Northern Ireland

The Northern Ireland Advisory Committee on Telecommunications (NIACT)

Calls to the helpline may be monitored for training purposes.
Consumers are advised to check with their phone companies for local rate tariff details.

contents


TABLE A: Top 10 complaints for the period 1 April 2000 to 30 September 2000

Notes:

Note 1: October 1999-March 2000 position in brackets
Note 2: MSP - Mobile Service Provider

Complaint
(see note 1

Total
Complaints

Companies Complained About                     

Company Number of Complaints Per 10,000 Customers Company Comment
1 Complaint ignored/ no action taken (1) 3152 BT
1372
0.48
BT The trial mentioned last time has now been written into all procedures. A further comprehensive action plan has also been put in place covering the whole complaints process.
BT Cellnet MSP 541 0.71 BT Cellnet MSP - see footnote

Orange MSP
186 0.26 Orange A further reduction of more than 35% in the number of complaints pre 10,000 customers is a significant improvement and clear evidence that the additional improvments to Orange customer service are delivering real benefits.
One2One MSP 178 0.31 One2One One 2 One is delighted by the reduction of over 55% in complaints per 10,000 as we continue investing in custoemr services with the opening of our 6th customer contact centre in 2001.
2 Failure / time taken to repair 2706 BT
2367
0.83
BT BT has recruited additional resources, focussed on reducing the fault rate and meeting peaks of work.  However, the extreme weather conditions have hampered progress.
3 Difficulty in contacting 2636 BT Cellnet MSP 730 0.96
BT Cellnet - see footnote
BT 694 0.24 BT BT has continued to recruit people to its call centres to answer an increasing volume of calls from its customers and is focussed on meeting peaks of calls.
NTL 307 2.00 NTL We are addressing call waiting times. We have introduced an email complaints process and a national approach to services.  This will take time, but customers will see benefits soon.
Orange   MSP 146 0.20 Orange MSP Orange is committed to providing the highest level of service and has recently announced a new Customer Commmunication Centre which will improve our customers' experience in contacting Orange.
World Online 139 21.55 World Online - no comment received
4 Compensation matters (9) 2136 BT

1440

0.50
BT BT is committed to ensuring its Custoemr Service Guarantee Scheme is correctly applied to eligible claims.  Improved system tools are in development to be effective by the year end.
BT Cellnet MSP
148 0.20 BT Cellnet MSP see footnote
5 Customer not kept informed (-) 2035 BT
906 0.32
BT This area is linked to the new action plan mentioned in 1.  In addition, BT has just begun a detailed refresher training programme for all Call Centre Management personnel
BT Cellnet MSP 338 0.45 BT Cellnet MSP - see footnote
6 Letters not answered (4) 1972 BT
650
023
BT All correspondence received by the front end is handled by one site, who decide the most appropriate course of action.  This process is constantly under review to ensure best practice
BT Cellnet MSP 423 0.56 BT Cellnet MSP - see footnote
Orange MSP
107 0.15 Orange MSP Orange is delighted to note the substantial improvement shown by a reduction of over 55% in the number of complaints per 10,000 customers which is a reflection of process improvements undertaken in this area
7 Charged for cancelled service (5) 1852 BT Cellnet MSP
492
0.65

 

BT Cellnet MSP - see footnote
Cellular Operations & First Line 284 58.05 Cellular Operations - no comment received
BT
191 0.07 BT - BT's policy is to ensure cancellation charges are explained to customers before they are raised.  When mistakes arise BT will correct the charge and apologise to the customer
Orange MSP 144 0.20 Orange MSP Orange is pleased to note the fall by more than 35% in the number of complaints per 10,000 customers.  We are continually reviewing our processes to further improve customer satisfaction in this area.
One 2 ONe MSP 110 0.19 One2One One 2 One is delighted by the reduction of over 60% in complaints per 10,000 as we continue to invest in our Customer Care & Billing System to improve billing quality and service to our customers
Singlepoint (4U) 101 1.64 Singlepoint (4U) as call charges are billed in arrears, customers will therefore receive a final invoice following disconnection, if their mobile telephone usage exceeds the allocation of free talk time.
Vodafone 96 0.12 Vodafone - declined to comment
8 Total loss of service (7) 1785 BT
1120
0.39
BT   BT is continuing in its investment to improve the resilience of its network infrastructure.  Progress has been hampered by the bad weather
BT Cellnet MSP 244 0.32 BT Cellnet MSP - see footnote
9 Problems with apparatus/systems 1519 BT
341
0.12
BT BT seeks to ensure that any apparatus problems are rectified and customer comments are fed back to incoporate into manufacturing and development processes
BT Cellnet MSP 307 0.40 BT Cellnet MSP - see footnote
Orange MSP 235 0.33
Orange MSP  Orange has introduced a specialist analysis team to review both internal processes and to feed back customer concerns to the manufacturers, thereby improving equipment quality for our customers
One2One MSP 149 0.26 One 2 One MSP One 2 One is encouraged by the reduction of over 35% in complaints per 10,000 customers.  We continue to work with handset manufacturers to improve the quality of equipment to our customers
10 Problems obtaining refunds 1480 BT Cellnet MSP
447
0.59
BT  Cellnet - See footnote
BT 274 0.10 BT   BT's policy is to refund customers when we make a mistake.   Additional training and coaching has been carried out and alterations in BT's systems/processes in November should help
Orange   MSP 124 0.17 Orange MSP The reduction in the number of complaints per 10,000 customers of over 20% shows the clear benefits of our automated refund process. Orange is committed to continue to improve this process
One 2 One MSP 108 0.19 One2One A reduction of over 50% in complaints per 10,000 customers once again reinforces One2One's commitment  to the continuous improvment in our customer service operations

Footnote: BT Cellnet's commnet: BT Cellnet continues to invest heavily in its customer service.   Resources are focussed to address key issues in order to improve the level of service to our customers.

contents


TABLE B: Top five companies most complained about (complaints data is weighted by the telecoms company’s customer base) for the period 1 April 2000 to 30 September 2000

Notes:

Note 1:  October 1999-March 2000 position in brackets

  Company

Complaints

Top 3 complaints against company Company comment
Total Per 10,000 customers
1 Cellular Operations & First Line (3)

1314

268.6

1. charged for cancelled service
2. problems with credit agencies/blacklisting
3. difficulty in contacting
No comments received
2 NextCall (2)

661

194.4

1. complaint ignored/no action taken
2. charge relates to old billing period
3. bill(s) not arrived
no comments received
3 World Online (1)

1137

176.3

1. difficulty in contacting
2. changes to internet access tariffs
3. complaint ignore/no action taken
no comments received
4 Quip & LineOne (-) 502

66.5

1. changes to internet access tariffs
2. difficulty in contacting
3. problems obtaining refunds
Quip These figures relate to the withdrawn internet offer from LineOne, for which Quip only provided the telephony service.  Customer satisfaction for Quip's own service are 95%
LineOne no comments received
5 WorldxChange (-) 144 22.8 1. bills not arrived
2. letters not answered
3. difficulty in contacting
Worldxchange can confirm  we have overcome all issues affecting late production of bills.   Recruitment and training within our call centre has led to improved letter and call handling

contents


Information to Note

Table A Criteria
  • Analysis is based on number of issues raised by complainants - not number of complainants
  • No company will be included if their customer base is less than 10,000
  • No company will be included if complaints relating to the company are less than 50 or less than 5% of the total complaints about issue
  • A complaint is defined as consumer expression of dissatisfaction relating to their telecoms company or a telecoms service
  • Includes business and residential customers
  • Customer base information is for 30 June 2000
  • Complaints per 10,000 customers will not be shown if a company does not wish to make its customer base information public
  • Complaints about cable television are excluded
Table B Criteria

As before, except:

  • No company will be included if complaints relating to the company are less than 100

Complaints about Mobiles

Oftel’s statement, Proposals for publishing information on complaints received by Oftel, explained that calculation of the denominator in the mobile market is slightly more complex than other areas as complaints can either relate to a network or a service provider. A separate calculation will be carried out for network complaints and service provider complaints.

Oftel defines "Network" as issues relating to coverage or reception quality. Mobile companies, if included in the published data, will therefore be listed in the following way:

BT Cellnet (mobile network)
BT Cellnet (mobile service provision)
Dolphin (mobile network)
Dolphin (mobile service provision)
One2one (mobile network)
One2one (mobile service provision)
Orange (mobile network)
Orange (mobile service provision)
Vodafone (mobile network)
Vodafone (mobile service provider)
[Independent company] (mobile service
provision)

NTL & Cable and Wireless Communications

On 30 May 2000 ntl took over parts of CWC. CWC cable customers and CWC residential indirect access customers became customers of ntl after that date.

 

 

Until the acquired parts of CWC became fully intergrated with ntl Oftel has decided to split complaints received about CWC and ntl into 3 groups:
  • ntl: existing ntl cable and indirect access business
  • CWC: up to take overon 30 May: CWC CAble, CWC indirect access.  After 30 May - business only indirect access companies
  • CWC now ntl: upto take over 30 May: nothing, after 30 May, CWC cable, CWC residential only indirect access customers

Company comments

Oftel invited the companies named in this publication to add their comments if they wished.  Oftel cannot vouch for the accuracy of of any comments made by companies in this publication.

Independent audit

An independent audit of the process behind Oftel's publication of complaints data was carried out by the company CMG UK Ltd in april 2000

Further Information

Oftel’s consumer pages can be found on its web site at:
www.Oftel.gov.uk/crs/index

Frequently asked questions can be found at
www.Oftel.gov.uk/crs/faq

Complaints statistics can be found at
www.Oftel.gov.uk/crs/statistics


home

contents

Layout image
Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image Layout image
Layout image Layout image