Landline and broadband customers who suffer slow repairs, or missed deadlines or appointments, would receive money back from their provider, without having to ask.
Ofcom is today proposing to require providers to pay automatic compensation – either a cash payment, or a credit on a bill – to customers who suffer from these kinds of poor service.
Customers would be entitled to automatic compensation, without having to go through a potentially lengthy and difficult claims process, whenever:
Ofcom estimates that the plans would mean up to 2.6 million additional landline and broadband customers could receive up to £185m in new compensation payments each year.
Lindsey Fussell, Ofcom’s Consumer Group Director, said: “When a customer’s landline or broadband goes wrong, that is frustrating enough without having to fight tooth and nail to get fair compensation from the provider.
“So we’re proposing new rules to force providers to pay money back to customers automatically, whenever repairs or installations don’t happen on time, or when people wait in for an engineer who doesn’t turn up. This would mean customers are properly compensated, while providers will want to work harder to improve their service.”
Compensation payments would be set by Ofcom, and designed to reflect the degree of harm suffered by consumers. Here is how Ofcom’s automatic compensation scheme would work:
|Problem||A landline or broadband customer would be entitled to compensation if...||Amount of compensation|
|Delayed repair following loss of service||Their service has stopped working and it is not fully fixed after two full working days.||£10 for each calendar day that the service is not repaired.|
|Missed appointments||An engineer does not turn up for a scheduled appointment, or it is cancelled with less than 24 hours' notice.||£30 per missed appointment.|
|Delays with the start of a new service||Their provider promises to start a new service on a particular date, but fails to do so.||£6 for each calendar day of delay, including the missed start date.|
Today’s proposals apply to fixed broadband and landline telephone services only. Our analysis shows that mobile companies already make significant compensation payments to customers and we estimate that less than 1% of mobile customers lose service for more than 24 hours. However, we will continue to monitor this area.
While most consumers are generally satisfied with their telecoms services, a significant minority still experience problems.
Our analysis suggests that each year:
When they occur, these problems can leave customers unable to keep in touch with friends and family, or use the internet, while one in four people (26%) who experienced a missed appointment have taken a wasted day off work to wait at home for an engineer.
Compensation payments are currently given ad-hoc to only a minority of those suffering problems (in up to 15% of cases), and can fail to adequately reflect the harm caused.
Around one-third of small and medium-sized enterprises choose residential landline and broadband services and would also benefit from our compensation proposals.
But we propose that all SMEs should benefit from clearer, more detailed information upfront about the service on offer – including whether they are entitled to compensation, and how much, when problems occur.
SMEs can negotiate bespoke terms and there are standard landline and broadband business contracts that provide service guarantees and compensation for a number of different problems, including loss of service. But our research found that around half of SMEs (49%) were uncertain of their rights when providers fell short.
Our proposals for greater transparency should help SMEs to compare the service quality and compensation arrangements for different contracts, and choose the one that best meets the needs of their business.
A consultation on today’s proposals is open until 5 June 2017 at 5pm, and we will publish our decision statement around the end of the year.
In response to Ofcom’s plans, BT, Sky and Virgin Media have jointly put forward a draft proposal to introduce automatic compensation through a draft voluntary industry code of practice. At this stage, we do not consider that this proposal sufficiently meets our concerns, when quality of service falls short.